复合材料结构的粘接——迄今为止的进展和仍存在的一些挑战

L. Hart-Smith
{"title":"复合材料结构的粘接——迄今为止的进展和仍存在的一些挑战","authors":"L. Hart-Smith","doi":"10.1520/CTR10566J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to describe and explain some highlights in the history of adhesive bonding of fibrous composite structures. Successes are described, along with opportunities to do better in future. The importance of making simple details is stressed, in the context of making high-strength composite parts free from wrinkles in the fibers. A case is made that secondary bonding is frequently less expensive than co-curing of complex “single-step” parts, despite the consistent projections that the opposite should be true. Some explanations are presented to explain how this misconception arises, based mainly on the issue that the estimates used for comparison are traditionally based on the costs of making only the first articles, whereas what should have been compared was the cost of making possibly very differently designed lower-cost parts and structures for series production. Some common misunderstandings about variable-thickness adhesives layers are put to rest by explaining how intense load transfer occurs only in small areas, where the adhesive layer is thinnest, with the rest of the bond area inevitably lightly stressed. The problem created by variable thickness bonds is not that of weak bonds. The thicker, and often porous, bond lines usually shed most of the load they were intended to transmit to nearby thin and stiffer areas. Indeed, the loss of load caused by softening can exceed the loss of strength caused by the porosity. No, the problem caused by variable thickness adhesive layers is that it increases the local stresses in the skin whenever the glue layer is thinnest. Traditional problems with release-agent-coated peel plies that prevent adhesion of the glue to the substrate are recounted. This issue is now fairly well known. What is far less understood is the adverse influence of pre-bond moisture that is unable to escape during the bond cycle. This prevents adhesion perhaps even more effectively than a layer of silicone. The importance of bonding only dry parts is explained. This is far easier to do at the time of original manufacture and less easy for in-service repairs and repainting. The paper concludes with a discussion of the important factors to be considered during design and analysis of bonded composite joints.","PeriodicalId":15514,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Composites Technology & Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"133-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adhesive Bonding of Composite Structures—Progress to Date and Some Remaining Challenges\",\"authors\":\"L. Hart-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1520/CTR10566J\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to describe and explain some highlights in the history of adhesive bonding of fibrous composite structures. Successes are described, along with opportunities to do better in future. The importance of making simple details is stressed, in the context of making high-strength composite parts free from wrinkles in the fibers. A case is made that secondary bonding is frequently less expensive than co-curing of complex “single-step” parts, despite the consistent projections that the opposite should be true. Some explanations are presented to explain how this misconception arises, based mainly on the issue that the estimates used for comparison are traditionally based on the costs of making only the first articles, whereas what should have been compared was the cost of making possibly very differently designed lower-cost parts and structures for series production. Some common misunderstandings about variable-thickness adhesives layers are put to rest by explaining how intense load transfer occurs only in small areas, where the adhesive layer is thinnest, with the rest of the bond area inevitably lightly stressed. The problem created by variable thickness bonds is not that of weak bonds. The thicker, and often porous, bond lines usually shed most of the load they were intended to transmit to nearby thin and stiffer areas. Indeed, the loss of load caused by softening can exceed the loss of strength caused by the porosity. No, the problem caused by variable thickness adhesive layers is that it increases the local stresses in the skin whenever the glue layer is thinnest. Traditional problems with release-agent-coated peel plies that prevent adhesion of the glue to the substrate are recounted. This issue is now fairly well known. What is far less understood is the adverse influence of pre-bond moisture that is unable to escape during the bond cycle. This prevents adhesion perhaps even more effectively than a layer of silicone. The importance of bonding only dry parts is explained. This is far easier to do at the time of original manufacture and less easy for in-service repairs and repainting. The paper concludes with a discussion of the important factors to be considered during design and analysis of bonded composite joints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Composites Technology & Research\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"133-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Composites Technology & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1520/CTR10566J\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Composites Technology & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/CTR10566J","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

本文的目的是描述和解释纤维复合材料结构粘接历史上的一些亮点。书中描述了成功,以及在未来做得更好的机会。强调了制作简单细节的重要性,在制作高强度复合材料部件的背景下,纤维中没有褶皱。有人提出,二次键合通常比复杂的“单步”部件共固化更便宜,尽管一贯的预测是相反的。提出了一些解释来解释这种误解是如何产生的,主要是基于这样一个问题,即用于比较的估计传统上只基于制造第一批产品的成本,而应该比较的是制造可能设计非常不同的低成本零件和批量生产结构的成本。一些关于变厚度胶粘剂层的常见误解,通过解释如何强烈的载荷传递只发生在小区域,其中胶粘剂层是最薄的,其余的粘合区域不可避免地轻微受力,来休息。变厚度键造成的问题不是弱键造成的问题。较厚且通常多孔的粘结线通常会将它们原本打算传递给附近较薄且较硬区域的大部分载荷散去。事实上,由软化引起的载荷损失可能超过由孔隙率引起的强度损失。不,不同厚度的胶层造成的问题是,当胶层最薄时,它会增加皮肤的局部应力。传统的问题与脱模剂涂层剥离层,防止胶水粘附到基材的叙述。这个问题现在已经相当广为人知了。人们很少了解的是在粘结循环中无法逃逸的粘结前水分的不利影响。这可能比一层硅胶更有效地防止粘连。说明了仅粘合干燥部件的重要性。这在最初制造时要容易得多,而在使用中维修和重新粉刷就不那么容易了。最后讨论了粘结复合材料接头设计与分析时应考虑的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adhesive Bonding of Composite Structures—Progress to Date and Some Remaining Challenges
The purpose of this paper is to describe and explain some highlights in the history of adhesive bonding of fibrous composite structures. Successes are described, along with opportunities to do better in future. The importance of making simple details is stressed, in the context of making high-strength composite parts free from wrinkles in the fibers. A case is made that secondary bonding is frequently less expensive than co-curing of complex “single-step” parts, despite the consistent projections that the opposite should be true. Some explanations are presented to explain how this misconception arises, based mainly on the issue that the estimates used for comparison are traditionally based on the costs of making only the first articles, whereas what should have been compared was the cost of making possibly very differently designed lower-cost parts and structures for series production. Some common misunderstandings about variable-thickness adhesives layers are put to rest by explaining how intense load transfer occurs only in small areas, where the adhesive layer is thinnest, with the rest of the bond area inevitably lightly stressed. The problem created by variable thickness bonds is not that of weak bonds. The thicker, and often porous, bond lines usually shed most of the load they were intended to transmit to nearby thin and stiffer areas. Indeed, the loss of load caused by softening can exceed the loss of strength caused by the porosity. No, the problem caused by variable thickness adhesive layers is that it increases the local stresses in the skin whenever the glue layer is thinnest. Traditional problems with release-agent-coated peel plies that prevent adhesion of the glue to the substrate are recounted. This issue is now fairly well known. What is far less understood is the adverse influence of pre-bond moisture that is unable to escape during the bond cycle. This prevents adhesion perhaps even more effectively than a layer of silicone. The importance of bonding only dry parts is explained. This is far easier to do at the time of original manufacture and less easy for in-service repairs and repainting. The paper concludes with a discussion of the important factors to be considered during design and analysis of bonded composite joints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信