{"title":"安吉洛·波利齐亚诺与《卡图卢斯笔记》中的石墨符号","authors":"Giovanni B. Grandi","doi":"10.30986/2019.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on a small group of variant readings written down by Angelo Poliziano in his copy of the editio princeps of Catullus, now Roma, Biblioteca Corsiniana, inc. 50.F.37. These notes are all introduced by a γραφeται symbol, which has not been taken into account by scholars so far and which, despite its ambiguity, could attest to manuscript collations. Many of these variant readings are similar to the ones recorded by Francesco Buzzacarini in his copy of Catullus, now Venezia, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, ms. lat. XII.153 (4053). This, along with the fact that Giorgio Merula mentions Buzzacarini as one of the scholars from whom Poliziano allegedly “stole” his emendations, is used as the basis for formulating new hypotheses concerning these variants.","PeriodicalId":52918,"journal":{"name":"Humanistica Lovaniensia","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angelo Poliziano and the graphetai Symbol in His Notes on Catullus\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni B. Grandi\",\"doi\":\"10.30986/2019.211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on a small group of variant readings written down by Angelo Poliziano in his copy of the editio princeps of Catullus, now Roma, Biblioteca Corsiniana, inc. 50.F.37. These notes are all introduced by a γραφeται symbol, which has not been taken into account by scholars so far and which, despite its ambiguity, could attest to manuscript collations. Many of these variant readings are similar to the ones recorded by Francesco Buzzacarini in his copy of Catullus, now Venezia, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, ms. lat. XII.153 (4053). This, along with the fact that Giorgio Merula mentions Buzzacarini as one of the scholars from whom Poliziano allegedly “stole” his emendations, is used as the basis for formulating new hypotheses concerning these variants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humanistica Lovaniensia\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humanistica Lovaniensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30986/2019.211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanistica Lovaniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30986/2019.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文的重点是安吉洛·波利齐亚诺(Angelo Poliziano)在他的《卡图卢斯的原理》(现罗马,Biblioteca Corsiniana, inc., 50.F.37)抄本中所写的一小部分变体读物。这些注释都是由一个γραφeται符号引入的,到目前为止,学者们还没有考虑到这个符号,尽管它含糊不清,但可以证明手稿的校核。这些不同的解读中,有许多与弗朗西斯科·布扎卡里尼(Francesco Buzzacarini)在他的《卡图卢斯》(Catullus)中所记录的内容相似,现收藏于威尼斯国家图书馆(Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana),拉特女士。XII.153(4053)。这一点,再加上乔治·梅鲁拉提到布扎卡里尼是波利齐亚诺据称“偷”了他的修订本的学者之一,被用来作为制定关于这些变体的新假设的基础。
Angelo Poliziano and the graphetai Symbol in His Notes on Catullus
This paper focuses on a small group of variant readings written down by Angelo Poliziano in his copy of the editio princeps of Catullus, now Roma, Biblioteca Corsiniana, inc. 50.F.37. These notes are all introduced by a γραφeται symbol, which has not been taken into account by scholars so far and which, despite its ambiguity, could attest to manuscript collations. Many of these variant readings are similar to the ones recorded by Francesco Buzzacarini in his copy of Catullus, now Venezia, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, ms. lat. XII.153 (4053). This, along with the fact that Giorgio Merula mentions Buzzacarini as one of the scholars from whom Poliziano allegedly “stole” his emendations, is used as the basis for formulating new hypotheses concerning these variants.