{"title":"玛丽亚。别杀我,我是你妈妈!卡米洛·卡斯特罗·布兰科:文学神正论","authors":"Tânia Furtado Moreira","doi":"10.21747/2182-1097/cem15a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes a reading of Maria! Não Me Mates, que Sou Tua Mãe! (1848), by Camilo Castelo Branco, with a special focus on the narration instance. The analysis of the narrator’s perspective, configured by the rhetorical pathos, will lead to a reflection on this Camillian narrative in the light of theodicy attempts as investigated by Immanuel Kant. Since the sapiential book of the Old Testament, the problem of theodicy has arisen when the good man Job, facing a catastrophe of unusual evils, perseveres in his belief in God. The Kantian reading of the Book of Job, a substantial hypotext in Camillian fiction, will allow us to elucidate this particular narrative in its theodicy bias, namely based on Kant’s critique of doctrinal theodicy","PeriodicalId":53268,"journal":{"name":"CEM Cultura Espaco Memoria","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maria! Não me mates, que sou tua mãe!, de Camilo Castelo Branco: uma teodiceia literária\",\"authors\":\"Tânia Furtado Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.21747/2182-1097/cem15a4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article proposes a reading of Maria! Não Me Mates, que Sou Tua Mãe! (1848), by Camilo Castelo Branco, with a special focus on the narration instance. The analysis of the narrator’s perspective, configured by the rhetorical pathos, will lead to a reflection on this Camillian narrative in the light of theodicy attempts as investigated by Immanuel Kant. Since the sapiential book of the Old Testament, the problem of theodicy has arisen when the good man Job, facing a catastrophe of unusual evils, perseveres in his belief in God. The Kantian reading of the Book of Job, a substantial hypotext in Camillian fiction, will allow us to elucidate this particular narrative in its theodicy bias, namely based on Kant’s critique of doctrinal theodicy\",\"PeriodicalId\":53268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CEM Cultura Espaco Memoria\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CEM Cultura Espaco Memoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21747/2182-1097/cem15a4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEM Cultura Espaco Memoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/2182-1097/cem15a4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章建议阅读《玛丽亚!》“哦,我的朋友们,que Sou Tua m !”(1848),作者Camilo Castelo Branco,特别关注叙述实例。对叙述者视角的分析,由修辞的感伤构成,将导致对这种卡米尔叙事的反思,在伊曼努尔·康德研究的神正论的尝试的光下。自从《旧约》的智慧之书以来,当好人约伯面对一场异常邪恶的灾难时,他坚持信仰上帝,神正论的问题就出现了。康德对《约伯记》的解读,是卡米利安小说中的一个重要的假设文本,将使我们能够阐明这种特殊的叙述,其神正论偏见,即基于康德对教义神正论的批判
Maria! Não me mates, que sou tua mãe!, de Camilo Castelo Branco: uma teodiceia literária
This article proposes a reading of Maria! Não Me Mates, que Sou Tua Mãe! (1848), by Camilo Castelo Branco, with a special focus on the narration instance. The analysis of the narrator’s perspective, configured by the rhetorical pathos, will lead to a reflection on this Camillian narrative in the light of theodicy attempts as investigated by Immanuel Kant. Since the sapiential book of the Old Testament, the problem of theodicy has arisen when the good man Job, facing a catastrophe of unusual evils, perseveres in his belief in God. The Kantian reading of the Book of Job, a substantial hypotext in Camillian fiction, will allow us to elucidate this particular narrative in its theodicy bias, namely based on Kant’s critique of doctrinal theodicy