“北方主导”人道主义的认识论政治:以黎巴嫩为例

Area (Oxford, England) Pub Date : 2021-11-07 DOI:10.1111/area.12770

E. Carpi

{"title":"“北方主导”人道主义的认识论政治:以黎巴嫩为例","authors":"E. Carpi","doi":"10.1111/area.12770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the epistemic politics of hegemonic humanitarianism by building on agnotology theories. I unpack the idea of “professional authority” with the purpose of showing how the Global North's humanitarian agencies thrive on both a technocratic and an unpredictability approach. This epistemic politics is used to absolve humanitarianism of its failures and to blame “Southern” politics and technical deficiencies in the Global South.","PeriodicalId":72297,"journal":{"name":"Area (Oxford, England)","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The epistemic politics of 'northern‐Led' humanitarianism: The case of Lebanon\",\"authors\":\"E. Carpi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/area.12770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the epistemic politics of hegemonic humanitarianism by building on agnotology theories. I unpack the idea of “professional authority” with the purpose of showing how the Global North's humanitarian agencies thrive on both a technocratic and an unpredictability approach. This epistemic politics is used to absolve humanitarianism of its failures and to blame “Southern” politics and technical deficiencies in the Global South.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Area (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Area (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文以不可知论理论为基础，考察霸权人道主义的认识政治。我对“专业权威”的概念进行了分析，目的是展示全球北方的人道主义机构是如何在技术官僚和不可预测的方法下茁壮成长的。这种认识论政治被用来为人道主义的失败开脱，并指责“南方”政治和全球南方的技术缺陷。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The epistemic politics of 'northern‐Led' humanitarianism: The case of Lebanon

This paper examines the epistemic politics of hegemonic humanitarianism by building on agnotology theories. I unpack the idea of “professional authority” with the purpose of showing how the Global North's humanitarian agencies thrive on both a technocratic and an unpredictability approach. This epistemic politics is used to absolve humanitarianism of its failures and to blame “Southern” politics and technical deficiencies in the Global South.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Area (Oxford, England)

自引率

0.00%

发文量