{"title":"数字的多样性:Maskilic希伯来语中数字的语言分析","authors":"L. Kahn, S. Yampolskaya","doi":"10.1353/hbr.2019.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article constitutes the first linguistic analysis of Maskilic Hebrew numerals. While it is commonly believed that Maskilic Hebrew exhibited a normative grammatical structure based largely on the biblical standard, examination of Maskilic texts reveals a much more diverse reality including elements of Biblical, Rabbinic, Medieval, and later Hebrew, as well as Yiddish and German, a reflection of the authors' rich linguistic background. The article explores the intriguing ways in which these different elements manifest themselves in Maskilic Hebrew numeral morphosyntax and usage. It analyses the key features of the numeral system drawing on examples from prominent Maskilic Hebrew texts of various fiction and nonfiction genres. These features include the avoidance of the dual in favor of the plural with the numeral [inline-graphic 01] 'two' (e.g., [inline-graphic 02] 'two years'); word order with basic and compound numerals (e.g., [inline-graphic 03] versus [inline-graphic 04] 'three days'; [inline-graphic 05] versus [inline-graphic 06] 'twenty five'); equalization of polar agreement (e.g., [inline-graphic 07] 'four princes' and [inline-graphic 08] 'six ships'); the use of the absolute and construct forms with numerals (e.g., [inline-graphic 09] 'the five months'); the use of ordinals to indicate hours (e.g., [inline-graphic 10] 'at four o'clock'); and the use of the German ordinal markers [inline-graphic 11]- and [inline-graphic 12]- to indicate dates (e.g., [inline-graphic 13] 20 [inline-graphic 14] 'on the twentieth of September'). The article provides a diachronic perspective on these Maskilic Hebrew features by examining their relationship with earlier forms of the language as well as with Modern Hebrew.","PeriodicalId":35110,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"389 - 417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity in Numbers: A Linguistic Analysis of Numerals in Maskilic Hebrew\",\"authors\":\"L. Kahn, S. Yampolskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hbr.2019.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article constitutes the first linguistic analysis of Maskilic Hebrew numerals. While it is commonly believed that Maskilic Hebrew exhibited a normative grammatical structure based largely on the biblical standard, examination of Maskilic texts reveals a much more diverse reality including elements of Biblical, Rabbinic, Medieval, and later Hebrew, as well as Yiddish and German, a reflection of the authors' rich linguistic background. The article explores the intriguing ways in which these different elements manifest themselves in Maskilic Hebrew numeral morphosyntax and usage. It analyses the key features of the numeral system drawing on examples from prominent Maskilic Hebrew texts of various fiction and nonfiction genres. These features include the avoidance of the dual in favor of the plural with the numeral [inline-graphic 01] 'two' (e.g., [inline-graphic 02] 'two years'); word order with basic and compound numerals (e.g., [inline-graphic 03] versus [inline-graphic 04] 'three days'; [inline-graphic 05] versus [inline-graphic 06] 'twenty five'); equalization of polar agreement (e.g., [inline-graphic 07] 'four princes' and [inline-graphic 08] 'six ships'); the use of the absolute and construct forms with numerals (e.g., [inline-graphic 09] 'the five months'); the use of ordinals to indicate hours (e.g., [inline-graphic 10] 'at four o'clock'); and the use of the German ordinal markers [inline-graphic 11]- and [inline-graphic 12]- to indicate dates (e.g., [inline-graphic 13] 20 [inline-graphic 14] 'on the twentieth of September'). The article provides a diachronic perspective on these Maskilic Hebrew features by examining their relationship with earlier forms of the language as well as with Modern Hebrew.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"389 - 417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2019.0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2019.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文首次对Maskilic希伯来数词进行了语言学分析。虽然人们普遍认为,Maskilic希伯来语在很大程度上是基于圣经标准的规范语法结构,但对Maskilic文本的研究揭示了一个更加多样化的现实,包括圣经、拉比、中世纪和后来的希伯来语,以及意第绪语和德语的元素,这反映了作者丰富的语言背景。文章探讨了有趣的方式,其中这些不同的元素体现自己在Maskilic希伯来语数字形态语法和用法。它分析了数字系统的主要特征,并从各种小说和非小说类型的突出的Maskilic希伯来文本中提取了例子。这些特征包括避免使用双义,而使用数字[inline-graphic 01] 'two'的复数形式(例如,[inline-graphic 02] 'two years');基本数词和复合数词的词序(例如,[inline-graphic 03]和[inline-graphic 04] 'three days';[inline-graphic 05] vs [inline-graphic 06] ' 25 ');极地协议的均衡化(例如,[内联图07]“四个王子”和[内联图08]“六艘船”);绝对定语和数字结构形式的使用(例如,[inline-graphic 09] ' The five months');使用序数来表示时间(例如,[内联图10]'at four o'clock');以及使用德语序数标记[inline-graphic 11]-和[inline-graphic 12]-来表示日期(例如,[inline-graphic 13] 20 [inline-graphic 14] 'on the twenty of September')。文章提供了一个历时的观点,这些Maskilic希伯来语的特点,通过检查他们的关系与早期形式的语言,以及与现代希伯来语。
Diversity in Numbers: A Linguistic Analysis of Numerals in Maskilic Hebrew
Abstract:This article constitutes the first linguistic analysis of Maskilic Hebrew numerals. While it is commonly believed that Maskilic Hebrew exhibited a normative grammatical structure based largely on the biblical standard, examination of Maskilic texts reveals a much more diverse reality including elements of Biblical, Rabbinic, Medieval, and later Hebrew, as well as Yiddish and German, a reflection of the authors' rich linguistic background. The article explores the intriguing ways in which these different elements manifest themselves in Maskilic Hebrew numeral morphosyntax and usage. It analyses the key features of the numeral system drawing on examples from prominent Maskilic Hebrew texts of various fiction and nonfiction genres. These features include the avoidance of the dual in favor of the plural with the numeral [inline-graphic 01] 'two' (e.g., [inline-graphic 02] 'two years'); word order with basic and compound numerals (e.g., [inline-graphic 03] versus [inline-graphic 04] 'three days'; [inline-graphic 05] versus [inline-graphic 06] 'twenty five'); equalization of polar agreement (e.g., [inline-graphic 07] 'four princes' and [inline-graphic 08] 'six ships'); the use of the absolute and construct forms with numerals (e.g., [inline-graphic 09] 'the five months'); the use of ordinals to indicate hours (e.g., [inline-graphic 10] 'at four o'clock'); and the use of the German ordinal markers [inline-graphic 11]- and [inline-graphic 12]- to indicate dates (e.g., [inline-graphic 13] 20 [inline-graphic 14] 'on the twentieth of September'). The article provides a diachronic perspective on these Maskilic Hebrew features by examining their relationship with earlier forms of the language as well as with Modern Hebrew.