四肢软组织肉瘤的解剖位置不影响其存活。

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
C. K. Chang, I. Jacobs, G. Salti
{"title":"四肢软组织肉瘤的解剖位置不影响其存活。","authors":"C. K. Chang, I. Jacobs, G. Salti","doi":"10.1200/JCO.2004.22.14_SUPPL.9056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"9056 Background: Various prognostic factors are known to influence outcome of soft tissue sarcomas. Although anatomic location of extremity sarcoma as a prognostic factor is debatable, several studies suggest lower extremity sarcoma have a worse outcome than upper extremity sarcoma. The aims of the current study were to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of soft tissue sarcomas located in the extremity, and test the prognostic value of a series of clinicopathological parameters.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA Retrospective review was undertaken to identify patients with sarcoma located in the extremities. All patients received their primary surgical treatment in our department between January 1991 and December 2001. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential predictive factors were evaluated with the log-rank test and Cox regression.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 134 patients identified, 99 patients had lower extremity sarcoma and 35 patients had upper extremity sarcoma. No differences in size, stage or adjuvant therapy were identified between upper and lower extremity sarcomas (p=.11, p=.22 and p=.24, respectively). Mean age was 50 years. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 1-116 months). By univariate analysis, stage, size, and adjuvant therapy of the primary tumor were associated with a decreased in both OS (p<.05) and DFS (p<.05). Age 50 years or greater influenced OS (p<.001) but not DFS (p=.21). Histology of the primary tumor did not effect OS (p=.21) but tended to effect DFS (p<.001). Anatomic location and gender did not significantly influence OS or DFS. By multivariate Cox regression, only adjuvant therapy effected DFS (p=.002). Age, gender, histology, size, stage, and adjuvant therapy did not significantly influence DFS. Overall-survival was influenced by age, histology, stage, and adjuvant therapy. Anatomic location did not have an effect on OS (p=.17) or DFS (p=.99).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nLocation of the primary site of extremity sarcoma does not influence overall survival and disease-free survival. Patients with upper extremity sarcoma do not have a worse outcome than patients with lower extremity sarcoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"9 1","pages":"9056"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomic location does not impact survival in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity.\",\"authors\":\"C. K. Chang, I. Jacobs, G. Salti\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO.2004.22.14_SUPPL.9056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"9056 Background: Various prognostic factors are known to influence outcome of soft tissue sarcomas. Although anatomic location of extremity sarcoma as a prognostic factor is debatable, several studies suggest lower extremity sarcoma have a worse outcome than upper extremity sarcoma. The aims of the current study were to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of soft tissue sarcomas located in the extremity, and test the prognostic value of a series of clinicopathological parameters.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA Retrospective review was undertaken to identify patients with sarcoma located in the extremities. All patients received their primary surgical treatment in our department between January 1991 and December 2001. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential predictive factors were evaluated with the log-rank test and Cox regression.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOf the 134 patients identified, 99 patients had lower extremity sarcoma and 35 patients had upper extremity sarcoma. No differences in size, stage or adjuvant therapy were identified between upper and lower extremity sarcomas (p=.11, p=.22 and p=.24, respectively). Mean age was 50 years. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 1-116 months). By univariate analysis, stage, size, and adjuvant therapy of the primary tumor were associated with a decreased in both OS (p<.05) and DFS (p<.05). Age 50 years or greater influenced OS (p<.001) but not DFS (p=.21). Histology of the primary tumor did not effect OS (p=.21) but tended to effect DFS (p<.001). Anatomic location and gender did not significantly influence OS or DFS. By multivariate Cox regression, only adjuvant therapy effected DFS (p=.002). Age, gender, histology, size, stage, and adjuvant therapy did not significantly influence DFS. Overall-survival was influenced by age, histology, stage, and adjuvant therapy. Anatomic location did not have an effect on OS (p=.17) or DFS (p=.99).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nLocation of the primary site of extremity sarcoma does not influence overall survival and disease-free survival. Patients with upper extremity sarcoma do not have a worse outcome than patients with lower extremity sarcoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"9056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.22.14_SUPPL.9056\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.22.14_SUPPL.9056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

9056背景:多种预后因素影响软组织肉瘤的预后。尽管肢体肉瘤的解剖位置作为预后因素存在争议,但一些研究表明下肢肉瘤的预后比上肢肉瘤差。本研究的目的是评估四肢软组织肉瘤的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),并测试一系列临床病理参数的预后价值。方法对四肢肉瘤患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者于1991年1月至2001年12月在我科接受手术治疗。采用log-rank检验和Cox回归对潜在预测因素进行单因素和多因素分析。结果134例患者中,下肢肉瘤99例,上肢肉瘤35例。上肢和下肢肉瘤在大小、分期或辅助治疗方面没有差异(p=。11日,p =。22和p=。24日,分别)。平均年龄为50岁。中位随访时间为27个月(范围1-116个月)。通过单因素分析,原发肿瘤的分期、大小和辅助治疗与OS (p< 0.05)和DFS (p< 0.05)的降低相关。年龄50岁或以上影响OS (p< 0.001),但对DFS没有影响(p= 0.21)。原发肿瘤组织学对OS无影响(p= 0.21),但对DFS有影响(p< 0.001)。解剖位置和性别对OS和DFS无显著影响。通过多因素Cox回归,只有辅助治疗对DFS有影响(p= 0.002)。年龄、性别、组织学、大小、分期和辅助治疗对DFS无显著影响。总生存率受年龄、组织学、分期和辅助治疗的影响。解剖位置对OS (p= 0.17)或DFS (p= 0.99)没有影响。结论四肢肉瘤原发部位的位置不影响总生存期和无病生存期。上肢肉瘤患者的预后并不比下肢肉瘤患者差。无重大财务关系需要披露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anatomic location does not impact survival in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity.
9056 Background: Various prognostic factors are known to influence outcome of soft tissue sarcomas. Although anatomic location of extremity sarcoma as a prognostic factor is debatable, several studies suggest lower extremity sarcoma have a worse outcome than upper extremity sarcoma. The aims of the current study were to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of soft tissue sarcomas located in the extremity, and test the prognostic value of a series of clinicopathological parameters. METHODS A Retrospective review was undertaken to identify patients with sarcoma located in the extremities. All patients received their primary surgical treatment in our department between January 1991 and December 2001. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential predictive factors were evaluated with the log-rank test and Cox regression. RESULTS Of the 134 patients identified, 99 patients had lower extremity sarcoma and 35 patients had upper extremity sarcoma. No differences in size, stage or adjuvant therapy were identified between upper and lower extremity sarcomas (p=.11, p=.22 and p=.24, respectively). Mean age was 50 years. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 1-116 months). By univariate analysis, stage, size, and adjuvant therapy of the primary tumor were associated with a decreased in both OS (p<.05) and DFS (p<.05). Age 50 years or greater influenced OS (p<.001) but not DFS (p=.21). Histology of the primary tumor did not effect OS (p=.21) but tended to effect DFS (p<.001). Anatomic location and gender did not significantly influence OS or DFS. By multivariate Cox regression, only adjuvant therapy effected DFS (p=.002). Age, gender, histology, size, stage, and adjuvant therapy did not significantly influence DFS. Overall-survival was influenced by age, histology, stage, and adjuvant therapy. Anatomic location did not have an effect on OS (p=.17) or DFS (p=.99). CONCLUSION Location of the primary site of extremity sarcoma does not influence overall survival and disease-free survival. Patients with upper extremity sarcoma do not have a worse outcome than patients with lower extremity sarcoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信