围绕并购的真实收益操纵:目标方视角

IF 4.3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Tariq Elrazaz, Moataz Elmassri, Yousry Ahmed
{"title":"围绕并购的真实收益操纵:目标方视角","authors":"Tariq Elrazaz, Moataz Elmassri, Yousry Ahmed","doi":"10.1108/IJAIM-11-2020-0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate whether UK public targets manage their earnings using real activities manipulation in the period prior to the announcement of a mergers and acquisition (M&A). It also examines whether the payment method in M&As affects the degree to which takeover targets manipulate earnings.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing a sample of 131 UK listed targets acquired over the period 1995–2013, this paper examines real earnings management (REM) by employing OLS regression models. The data related to deals have been mainly collected from Thomson One Banker and Thomson Reuters Eikon databases. REM is examined by investigating abnormal cash flow from operations, abnormal discretionary expenses and abnormal production costs. This analysis was supplemented by conducting additional robustness checks.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that UK takeover targets manage earnings upwards through cutting discretionary expenses in the year prior to the acquisition, while they do not do so by manipulating sales or production costs. Moreover, targets of cash-only or mixed-payment deals do not have the same strong motivation to manage their earnings as stock-financed deal target counterparts do. Our results continue to hold after using alternative accrual earnings management (EM) measures, controlling for unobservable firm heterogeneity using the fixed-effect model and controlling for endogeneity using the two-stage Heckman (1979) model.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe main findings of this study could be beneficial for various parties involved M&As, such as standard setters and regulators. A need arises to improve disclosure rules and enhance overall financial reporting quality in the capital markets with the aim of reducing information asymmetry and agency conflicts.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAs far as the literature on EM around M&As is concerned, only EM by acquirers has been examined, and not much attention has been paid to targets’ EM.\n","PeriodicalId":46371,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real earnings manipulation surrounding mergers and acquisitions: the targets’ perspective\",\"authors\":\"Tariq Elrazaz, Moataz Elmassri, Yousry Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/IJAIM-11-2020-0188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to investigate whether UK public targets manage their earnings using real activities manipulation in the period prior to the announcement of a mergers and acquisition (M&A). It also examines whether the payment method in M&As affects the degree to which takeover targets manipulate earnings.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nUsing a sample of 131 UK listed targets acquired over the period 1995–2013, this paper examines real earnings management (REM) by employing OLS regression models. The data related to deals have been mainly collected from Thomson One Banker and Thomson Reuters Eikon databases. REM is examined by investigating abnormal cash flow from operations, abnormal discretionary expenses and abnormal production costs. This analysis was supplemented by conducting additional robustness checks.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results show that UK takeover targets manage earnings upwards through cutting discretionary expenses in the year prior to the acquisition, while they do not do so by manipulating sales or production costs. Moreover, targets of cash-only or mixed-payment deals do not have the same strong motivation to manage their earnings as stock-financed deal target counterparts do. Our results continue to hold after using alternative accrual earnings management (EM) measures, controlling for unobservable firm heterogeneity using the fixed-effect model and controlling for endogeneity using the two-stage Heckman (1979) model.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe main findings of this study could be beneficial for various parties involved M&As, such as standard setters and regulators. A need arises to improve disclosure rules and enhance overall financial reporting quality in the capital markets with the aim of reducing information asymmetry and agency conflicts.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nAs far as the literature on EM around M&As is concerned, only EM by acquirers has been examined, and not much attention has been paid to targets’ EM.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-11-2020-0188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-11-2020-0188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文旨在调查英国公共目标是否在宣布并购(M&A)之前使用真实活动操纵来管理其收益。本文还考察了并购中的支付方式是否会影响收购目标操纵盈余的程度。本文以1995-2013年期间收购的131家英国上市公司为样本,采用OLS回归模型检验了实际盈余管理(REM)。与交易相关的数据主要来自Thomson One Banker和Thomson Reuters Eikon数据库。REM是通过调查异常的经营现金流、异常的可自由支配费用和异常的生产成本来检验的。通过进行额外的健壮性检查来补充此分析。研究结果表明,英国的收购目标通过在收购前一年削减可自由支配的开支来提高收益,而他们并不通过操纵销售或生产成本来做到这一点。此外,纯现金或混合支付交易的目标企业没有像股票融资交易的目标企业那样强烈的动机来管理自己的收益。在使用替代权责发生盈余管理(EM)措施,使用固定效应模型控制不可观察的企业异质性和使用两阶段Heckman(1979)模型控制内生性之后,我们的结果仍然成立。实际意义本研究的主要发现可能对并购的各方有益,如标准制定者和监管者。有必要改进披露规则,提高资本市场的整体财务报告质量,以减少信息不对称和代理冲突。就并购相关的新兴市场研究文献而言,只研究了收购方的新兴市场,而对目标企业的新兴市场关注较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real earnings manipulation surrounding mergers and acquisitions: the targets’ perspective
Purpose This paper aims to investigate whether UK public targets manage their earnings using real activities manipulation in the period prior to the announcement of a mergers and acquisition (M&A). It also examines whether the payment method in M&As affects the degree to which takeover targets manipulate earnings. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 131 UK listed targets acquired over the period 1995–2013, this paper examines real earnings management (REM) by employing OLS regression models. The data related to deals have been mainly collected from Thomson One Banker and Thomson Reuters Eikon databases. REM is examined by investigating abnormal cash flow from operations, abnormal discretionary expenses and abnormal production costs. This analysis was supplemented by conducting additional robustness checks. Findings The results show that UK takeover targets manage earnings upwards through cutting discretionary expenses in the year prior to the acquisition, while they do not do so by manipulating sales or production costs. Moreover, targets of cash-only or mixed-payment deals do not have the same strong motivation to manage their earnings as stock-financed deal target counterparts do. Our results continue to hold after using alternative accrual earnings management (EM) measures, controlling for unobservable firm heterogeneity using the fixed-effect model and controlling for endogeneity using the two-stage Heckman (1979) model. Practical implications The main findings of this study could be beneficial for various parties involved M&As, such as standard setters and regulators. A need arises to improve disclosure rules and enhance overall financial reporting quality in the capital markets with the aim of reducing information asymmetry and agency conflicts. Originality/value As far as the literature on EM around M&As is concerned, only EM by acquirers has been examined, and not much attention has been paid to targets’ EM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Accounting & Information Management focuses on publishing research in accounting, finance, and information management. It specifically emphasizes the interaction between these research areas on an international scale and within both the private and public sectors. The aim of the journal is to bridge the knowledge gap between researchers and practitioners by covering various issues that arise in the field. These include information systems, accounting information management, innovation and technology in accounting, accounting standards and reporting, and capital market efficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信