OHADA公司法和事实上的公司

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Medret Lekunga Ndangoh
{"title":"OHADA公司法和事实上的公司","authors":"Medret Lekunga Ndangoh","doi":"10.1093/ULR/UNAA011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The propagation of de facto companies in the Organization for the Harmonization of Corporate Law in Africa’s (OHADA) Uniform Act on Company Law is so evident that it cannot be neglected. Some are permitted by the legislator (joint ventures) and others impose themselves (sociétés de fait and sociétés créées de faits). Contrary to other fields of law that reject factual situations, the OHADA Uniform Act on Company Law receives de facto companies and submits them to rules naturally meant for legal companies or legal entities. The purpose of this article is to determine the position of the OHADA Company Law with regard to the invasion of company law by de facto companies. A study of the Uniform Act on Company Law has revealed that de facto companies are recognized and treated as legal entities. We believe that the essence of this recognition is linked to the OHADA legislator’s desire to attain his or her objectives—namely, to secure business relations that can only be possible through the protection of the business, the interest of its partners, and even the interest of third parties.","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"441 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The OHADA Company Law and de facto companies\",\"authors\":\"Medret Lekunga Ndangoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ULR/UNAA011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The propagation of de facto companies in the Organization for the Harmonization of Corporate Law in Africa’s (OHADA) Uniform Act on Company Law is so evident that it cannot be neglected. Some are permitted by the legislator (joint ventures) and others impose themselves (sociétés de fait and sociétés créées de faits). Contrary to other fields of law that reject factual situations, the OHADA Uniform Act on Company Law receives de facto companies and submits them to rules naturally meant for legal companies or legal entities. The purpose of this article is to determine the position of the OHADA Company Law with regard to the invasion of company law by de facto companies. A study of the Uniform Act on Company Law has revealed that de facto companies are recognized and treated as legal entities. We believe that the essence of this recognition is linked to the OHADA legislator’s desire to attain his or her objectives—namely, to secure business relations that can only be possible through the protection of the business, the interest of its partners, and even the interest of third parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uniform Law Review\",\"volume\":\"441 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uniform Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ULR/UNAA011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ULR/UNAA011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非洲公司法协调组织的《公司法统一法》中,事实公司的传播是如此明显,不容忽视。有些是由立法者允许的(合资企业),有些则是强加于人的(社会组织和社会组织)。与拒绝事实性的其他法律不同,《OHADA公司法统一法》接受事实性的公司,并将其置于适用于法律公司或法人的规则之下。本文的目的是确定OHADA公司法在事实公司侵犯公司法方面的地位。对《公司法统一法》的研究表明,事实上的公司被视为法律实体。我们认为,这种认可的本质与OHADA立法者实现其目标的愿望有关,即确保只有通过保护业务,合作伙伴的利益,甚至第三方的利益才能实现的商业关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The OHADA Company Law and de facto companies
The propagation of de facto companies in the Organization for the Harmonization of Corporate Law in Africa’s (OHADA) Uniform Act on Company Law is so evident that it cannot be neglected. Some are permitted by the legislator (joint ventures) and others impose themselves (sociétés de fait and sociétés créées de faits). Contrary to other fields of law that reject factual situations, the OHADA Uniform Act on Company Law receives de facto companies and submits them to rules naturally meant for legal companies or legal entities. The purpose of this article is to determine the position of the OHADA Company Law with regard to the invasion of company law by de facto companies. A study of the Uniform Act on Company Law has revealed that de facto companies are recognized and treated as legal entities. We believe that the essence of this recognition is linked to the OHADA legislator’s desire to attain his or her objectives—namely, to secure business relations that can only be possible through the protection of the business, the interest of its partners, and even the interest of third parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信