老年人对急诊科的滥用:神话还是现实?

D. Eagle, E. Rideout, P. Price, C. McCann, E. Wonnacott
{"title":"老年人对急诊科的滥用:神话还是现实?","authors":"D. Eagle, E. Rideout, P. Price, C. McCann, E. Wonnacott","doi":"10.5555/URI:PII:009917679390183T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo determine the use pattern of the emergency department by people 65 years of age and older.\n\n\nDESIGN\nCross-sectional survey from chart audits and personal interviews of all people older than 64 years attending an emergency department in a Canadian teaching hospital.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\nAll patients older than 64 years attending the emergency department during the months of February, May, August, and November. Comparison samples of adults aged 16 to 64 years attending the same emergency department and patients older than 64 years attending the emergency department of a similar hospital during the same period were obtained.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFifteen percent of the total population attending the emergency department in 1 year were 65 years of age and older (N = 1744). The average age was 75 years; 57% were female, 53% were married, and 40% were widowed. Eighty-four percent lived in their own homes and 6% lived in nursing homes. Twenty-two percent were classified as emergent, 75% as urgent, and 3% as deferrable; 45% were admitted. The discharge diagnoses were widely divergent, with the most common being soft-tissue injury (9.1%), fracture (7.1%), arteriosclerotic heart disease (6.1%), congestive heart failure (4.1%), and abdominal pain (3.4%). Patients tended to appear in the emergency department more frequently during the day shift (60%) and less frequently on weekends. Forty-five percent had never attended the emergency department or been admitted to hospital in the previous year; 30% had attended or been admitted once.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nElderly persons do not misuse the services of the emergency department. They come because they are acutely ill; they are not frequent attenders, and their presenting complaints do require intervention (frequently hospitalization). The study findings are generalizable to the older population in the Hamilton-Wentworth region and raise such questions as whether some hospital admissions could have been avoided by earlier interventions in the community.","PeriodicalId":15691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association","volume":"62 1","pages":"212-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"60","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misuse of the emergency department by the elderly population: myth or reality?\",\"authors\":\"D. Eagle, E. Rideout, P. Price, C. McCann, E. Wonnacott\",\"doi\":\"10.5555/URI:PII:009917679390183T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo determine the use pattern of the emergency department by people 65 years of age and older.\\n\\n\\nDESIGN\\nCross-sectional survey from chart audits and personal interviews of all people older than 64 years attending an emergency department in a Canadian teaching hospital.\\n\\n\\nPARTICIPANTS\\nAll patients older than 64 years attending the emergency department during the months of February, May, August, and November. Comparison samples of adults aged 16 to 64 years attending the same emergency department and patients older than 64 years attending the emergency department of a similar hospital during the same period were obtained.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nFifteen percent of the total population attending the emergency department in 1 year were 65 years of age and older (N = 1744). The average age was 75 years; 57% were female, 53% were married, and 40% were widowed. Eighty-four percent lived in their own homes and 6% lived in nursing homes. Twenty-two percent were classified as emergent, 75% as urgent, and 3% as deferrable; 45% were admitted. The discharge diagnoses were widely divergent, with the most common being soft-tissue injury (9.1%), fracture (7.1%), arteriosclerotic heart disease (6.1%), congestive heart failure (4.1%), and abdominal pain (3.4%). Patients tended to appear in the emergency department more frequently during the day shift (60%) and less frequently on weekends. Forty-five percent had never attended the emergency department or been admitted to hospital in the previous year; 30% had attended or been admitted once.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nElderly persons do not misuse the services of the emergency department. They come because they are acutely ill; they are not frequent attenders, and their presenting complaints do require intervention (frequently hospitalization). The study findings are generalizable to the older population in the Hamilton-Wentworth region and raise such questions as whether some hospital admissions could have been avoided by earlier interventions in the community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"212-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"60\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5555/URI:PII:009917679390183T\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5555/URI:PII:009917679390183T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

摘要

目的了解65岁及以上老年人急诊科的使用模式。设计对加拿大某教学医院急诊科所有64岁以上患者的图表审计和个人访谈进行横断面调查。参与者:所有年龄大于64岁的患者在2月、5月、8月和11月期间就诊于急诊科。在同一时期,在同一家医院急诊科就诊的16岁至64岁的成年人和在同一时期在同一家医院急诊科就诊的64岁以上的患者进行了比较。结果1年内急诊就诊的65岁及以上患者占总人数的15% (N = 1744)。平均年龄为75岁;57%为女性,53%为已婚,40%为丧偶。84%的人住在自己家里,6%的人住在养老院。22%为紧急事件,75%为紧急事件,3%为延期事件;录取率为45%。出院诊断差异很大,最常见的是软组织损伤(9.1%)、骨折(7.1%)、动脉硬化性心脏病(6.1%)、充血性心力衰竭(4.1%)和腹痛(3.4%)。患者往往在白班期间出现在急诊科的频率更高(60%),而在周末出现的频率较低。45%的人在前一年从未进过急诊室或住过院;30%的人曾参加过或被录取过一次。结论老年人不存在滥用急诊服务的现象。他们来是因为他们病得很重;他们不经常来医院,而且他们的主诉确实需要干预(经常住院)。研究结果可以推广到汉密尔顿-温特沃斯地区的老年人口,并提出了这样的问题,即是否可以通过早期的社区干预来避免一些住院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misuse of the emergency department by the elderly population: myth or reality?
OBJECTIVE To determine the use pattern of the emergency department by people 65 years of age and older. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey from chart audits and personal interviews of all people older than 64 years attending an emergency department in a Canadian teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS All patients older than 64 years attending the emergency department during the months of February, May, August, and November. Comparison samples of adults aged 16 to 64 years attending the same emergency department and patients older than 64 years attending the emergency department of a similar hospital during the same period were obtained. RESULTS Fifteen percent of the total population attending the emergency department in 1 year were 65 years of age and older (N = 1744). The average age was 75 years; 57% were female, 53% were married, and 40% were widowed. Eighty-four percent lived in their own homes and 6% lived in nursing homes. Twenty-two percent were classified as emergent, 75% as urgent, and 3% as deferrable; 45% were admitted. The discharge diagnoses were widely divergent, with the most common being soft-tissue injury (9.1%), fracture (7.1%), arteriosclerotic heart disease (6.1%), congestive heart failure (4.1%), and abdominal pain (3.4%). Patients tended to appear in the emergency department more frequently during the day shift (60%) and less frequently on weekends. Forty-five percent had never attended the emergency department or been admitted to hospital in the previous year; 30% had attended or been admitted once. CONCLUSION Elderly persons do not misuse the services of the emergency department. They come because they are acutely ill; they are not frequent attenders, and their presenting complaints do require intervention (frequently hospitalization). The study findings are generalizable to the older population in the Hamilton-Wentworth region and raise such questions as whether some hospital admissions could have been avoided by earlier interventions in the community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信