Zahava L. Friedman, Kurt Hubbard, Francine M. Seruya
{"title":"建立更好的团队:教育和辅导干预对学校教师和职业治疗师跨专业合作的影响","authors":"Zahava L. Friedman, Kurt Hubbard, Francine M. Seruya","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2022.2037492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Most American school-based occupational therapy (SBOT) practitioners do not report utilizing research-supported collaborative models of therapy (Gallagher & Richards, 2020). The purpose of this quantitative, quasi-experimental study was to determine whether a 4-month-long training and coaching program could improve interprofessional collaboration skills, measured by pre- and post-self-scoring. Training and coaching content built upon theoretical foundations of Universal Design for Learning, where learning is intentionally designed to maximize access for all learners, and Distributed Cognition, where each group member contributes unique knowledge to the team. Interprofessional collaboration was operationalized into three discrete skills: communication, role perception, and conflict resolution. Research questions investigated whether training and coaching strategies could improve communication, role perception, and conflict resolution, measured by improved posttest scores. Sample consisted of 27 pairs of school-based occupational therapists and classroom teachers from central New Jersey. For data analysis, sum for each item pre and post was calculated then classified by variable. Paired-sample t-test determined whether sums showed significant differences. For communication, role perception, and conflict resolution, the paired sample t-test analysis revealed significance at .000. Participants’ self-reported scores showed statistically significant increase on all three variables. Overall, this study provided a precedent for potential effectiveness of longer-term training/coaching sequences to improve interprofessional collaboration for occupational therapists and teachers in school-based settings.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"191 1","pages":"173 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Better Teams: Impact of Education And Coaching Intervention on Interprofessional Collaboration Between Teachers and Occupational Therapists in Schools\",\"authors\":\"Zahava L. Friedman, Kurt Hubbard, Francine M. Seruya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19411243.2022.2037492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Most American school-based occupational therapy (SBOT) practitioners do not report utilizing research-supported collaborative models of therapy (Gallagher & Richards, 2020). The purpose of this quantitative, quasi-experimental study was to determine whether a 4-month-long training and coaching program could improve interprofessional collaboration skills, measured by pre- and post-self-scoring. Training and coaching content built upon theoretical foundations of Universal Design for Learning, where learning is intentionally designed to maximize access for all learners, and Distributed Cognition, where each group member contributes unique knowledge to the team. Interprofessional collaboration was operationalized into three discrete skills: communication, role perception, and conflict resolution. Research questions investigated whether training and coaching strategies could improve communication, role perception, and conflict resolution, measured by improved posttest scores. Sample consisted of 27 pairs of school-based occupational therapists and classroom teachers from central New Jersey. For data analysis, sum for each item pre and post was calculated then classified by variable. Paired-sample t-test determined whether sums showed significant differences. For communication, role perception, and conflict resolution, the paired sample t-test analysis revealed significance at .000. Participants’ self-reported scores showed statistically significant increase on all three variables. Overall, this study provided a precedent for potential effectiveness of longer-term training/coaching sequences to improve interprofessional collaboration for occupational therapists and teachers in school-based settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention\",\"volume\":\"191 1\",\"pages\":\"173 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2022.2037492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2022.2037492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
大多数美国基于学校的职业治疗(SBOT)从业人员并未报告使用研究支持的合作治疗模式(Gallagher & Richards, 2020)。这个定量的、准实验的研究目的是确定一个为期4个月的培训和指导计划是否可以提高跨专业合作技能,通过前后自我评分来衡量。培训和指导内容建立在学习通用设计(Universal Design for Learning)和分布式认知(Distributed Cognition)的理论基础之上,其中学习被有意地设计为最大限度地为所有学习者提供机会,其中每个小组成员都为团队贡献独特的知识。跨专业协作被操作化为三个独立的技能:沟通、角色感知和冲突解决。研究问题调查了训练和指导策略是否可以改善沟通、角色感知和冲突解决,通过提高后测分数来衡量。样本由来自新泽西州中部的27对学校职业治疗师和课堂教师组成。对数据进行分析时,计算各项目前后的总和,然后按变量分类。配对样本t检验确定总和是否有显著差异。对于沟通、角色感知和冲突解决,配对样本t检验分析显示显著性为0.000。参与者自我报告的分数在这三个变量上都有统计学上的显著提高。总的来说,本研究为长期培训/指导序列的潜在有效性提供了先例,以改善学校背景下职业治疗师和教师的跨专业合作。
Building Better Teams: Impact of Education And Coaching Intervention on Interprofessional Collaboration Between Teachers and Occupational Therapists in Schools
ABSTRACT Most American school-based occupational therapy (SBOT) practitioners do not report utilizing research-supported collaborative models of therapy (Gallagher & Richards, 2020). The purpose of this quantitative, quasi-experimental study was to determine whether a 4-month-long training and coaching program could improve interprofessional collaboration skills, measured by pre- and post-self-scoring. Training and coaching content built upon theoretical foundations of Universal Design for Learning, where learning is intentionally designed to maximize access for all learners, and Distributed Cognition, where each group member contributes unique knowledge to the team. Interprofessional collaboration was operationalized into three discrete skills: communication, role perception, and conflict resolution. Research questions investigated whether training and coaching strategies could improve communication, role perception, and conflict resolution, measured by improved posttest scores. Sample consisted of 27 pairs of school-based occupational therapists and classroom teachers from central New Jersey. For data analysis, sum for each item pre and post was calculated then classified by variable. Paired-sample t-test determined whether sums showed significant differences. For communication, role perception, and conflict resolution, the paired sample t-test analysis revealed significance at .000. Participants’ self-reported scores showed statistically significant increase on all three variables. Overall, this study provided a precedent for potential effectiveness of longer-term training/coaching sequences to improve interprofessional collaboration for occupational therapists and teachers in school-based settings.