从CATH的系统基因组分析推断蛋白质结构的进化

S. A. Bukhari, G. Caetano-Anollés
{"title":"从CATH的系统基因组分析推断蛋白质结构的进化","authors":"S. A. Bukhari, G. Caetano-Anollés","doi":"10.1109/BIBMW.2011.6112548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protein architecture refers to similar secondary structural arrangements irrespective of their connectivity. Here we aim to explore the evolution of protein architectures by benchmarking CATH and SCOP annotations. For example, we explore the appearance and diversification of protein architectures such as sandwiches, bundles, barrels, solenoids, ribbons, trefoils, prisms and propellers. Structural phylogenies generated at CATH “A”, “T” and “H” levels of structural abstraction revealed patterns of reductive evolution and three epochs in the evolution of protein world. Although CATH and SCOP differ significantly in their protein domain definitions and in the hierarchical partitioning of fold space, our findings strongly support the fact that both protein structural classification systems classify a protein on a very similar theoretical basis by taking into account their structural, functional and evolutionary roles. The tree of “A” showed that the 3-layer (aba) sandwich (3.40), the orthogonal bundle (1.10) and the alpha-beta complex (3.90) harbor simple secondary structure arrangements that are the most ancient, popular and abundant architectures in the protein world.","PeriodicalId":6345,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW)","volume":"132 12 1","pages":"1029-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of protein architectures inferred from phylogenomic analysis of CATH\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Bukhari, G. Caetano-Anollés\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BIBMW.2011.6112548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protein architecture refers to similar secondary structural arrangements irrespective of their connectivity. Here we aim to explore the evolution of protein architectures by benchmarking CATH and SCOP annotations. For example, we explore the appearance and diversification of protein architectures such as sandwiches, bundles, barrels, solenoids, ribbons, trefoils, prisms and propellers. Structural phylogenies generated at CATH “A”, “T” and “H” levels of structural abstraction revealed patterns of reductive evolution and three epochs in the evolution of protein world. Although CATH and SCOP differ significantly in their protein domain definitions and in the hierarchical partitioning of fold space, our findings strongly support the fact that both protein structural classification systems classify a protein on a very similar theoretical basis by taking into account their structural, functional and evolutionary roles. The tree of “A” showed that the 3-layer (aba) sandwich (3.40), the orthogonal bundle (1.10) and the alpha-beta complex (3.90) harbor simple secondary structure arrangements that are the most ancient, popular and abundant architectures in the protein world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW)\",\"volume\":\"132 12 1\",\"pages\":\"1029-1031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBMW.2011.6112548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBMW.2011.6112548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

蛋白质结构是指相似的二级结构排列,而不考虑它们的连通性。在这里,我们的目标是通过对CATH和SCOP注释进行基准测试来探索蛋白质结构的演变。例如,我们探索蛋白质结构的外观和多样化,如三明治,束,桶,螺线管,丝带,三叶草,棱镜和螺旋桨。在结构抽象的CATH“A”、“T”和“H”水平上产生的结构系统发育揭示了蛋白质世界进化的还原进化模式和三个时代。尽管CATH和SCOP在蛋白质结构域定义和折叠空间的分层划分方面存在显著差异,但我们的研究结果强烈支持这一事实,即两种蛋白质结构分类系统通过考虑其结构、功能和进化作用,在非常相似的理论基础上对蛋白质进行分类。“A”树表明,3层(aba)三明治(3.40)、正交束(1.10)和α - β复合物(3.90)具有简单的二级结构排列,是蛋白质世界中最古老、最流行和最丰富的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolution of protein architectures inferred from phylogenomic analysis of CATH
Protein architecture refers to similar secondary structural arrangements irrespective of their connectivity. Here we aim to explore the evolution of protein architectures by benchmarking CATH and SCOP annotations. For example, we explore the appearance and diversification of protein architectures such as sandwiches, bundles, barrels, solenoids, ribbons, trefoils, prisms and propellers. Structural phylogenies generated at CATH “A”, “T” and “H” levels of structural abstraction revealed patterns of reductive evolution and three epochs in the evolution of protein world. Although CATH and SCOP differ significantly in their protein domain definitions and in the hierarchical partitioning of fold space, our findings strongly support the fact that both protein structural classification systems classify a protein on a very similar theoretical basis by taking into account their structural, functional and evolutionary roles. The tree of “A” showed that the 3-layer (aba) sandwich (3.40), the orthogonal bundle (1.10) and the alpha-beta complex (3.90) harbor simple secondary structure arrangements that are the most ancient, popular and abundant architectures in the protein world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信