结直肠癌手术患者p -负鼠和cr -负鼠评分的外科评价

S. Alam, Ayesha Rahman, A. Ahmed, M. Haque, Nazia Mehnaz Joty, A. Talukder
{"title":"结直肠癌手术患者p -负鼠和cr -负鼠评分的外科评价","authors":"S. Alam, Ayesha Rahman, A. Ahmed, M. Haque, Nazia Mehnaz Joty, A. Talukder","doi":"10.3329/jninb.v6i2.50767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \"Portsmouth\" modification of POSSUM (P-POSSUM) scoring system used to assess mortality in general surgical patients and “Colorectal” Cr-POSSUM scoring system used for mortality assessment for colorectal patient. \nObjective: The purpose of the present study was to estimate the validity of the P-POSSUM (Portsmouth-POSSUM) and Cr-POSSUM (Colorectal-POSSUM) score in predicting the risk of mortality in colorectal cancer patient. \nMethodology: This was single centre clinical trial was carried out in the Department of Surgery at Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from November 2013 to April 2014 for a period of six (06) months. Patients of both sex who got admitted in the surgery in-patient department for elective colorectal cancer operations were selected as study population. Both the P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM, physiological score, operative score, predicted mortality rate were calculated using an online POSSUM calculator. Based on both P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM Scoring, patients were categorized into three risk groups. Then a comparative analysis was performed between the observed and the predicted values as well as the Observed/Predicted ratio (O:P) in all the risk groups. \nResults: A total of 50 patients with the median age of 50 (ranging 20 to 72) years were studied. 30 days overall observed mortality was 3(6%) patients. The mean P-POSSUM and C-POSSUM physiological scores were 32.49±2.08 and 13.92±1.30 respectively. However, the operative score was 11.59±1.46 and 8.12±0.24 in P-POSSUM and C-POSSUM respectively. The overall mortality predicted by the P-POSSUM model was 5 patients (19.33±2.87) and mortality predicted by the Cr-POSSUM model was 4 patients (20.66±4.09). \nConclusion: In conclusion both model accurately predicted the risk of postoperative death. Cr-POSSUM provided a better fit to observed results than P-POSSUM. \nJournal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, 2020;6(2): 118-123","PeriodicalId":16732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Evaluation of P-Possum and Cr-Possum Scores in Patient Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Operation\",\"authors\":\"S. Alam, Ayesha Rahman, A. Ahmed, M. Haque, Nazia Mehnaz Joty, A. Talukder\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jninb.v6i2.50767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: \\\"Portsmouth\\\" modification of POSSUM (P-POSSUM) scoring system used to assess mortality in general surgical patients and “Colorectal” Cr-POSSUM scoring system used for mortality assessment for colorectal patient. \\nObjective: The purpose of the present study was to estimate the validity of the P-POSSUM (Portsmouth-POSSUM) and Cr-POSSUM (Colorectal-POSSUM) score in predicting the risk of mortality in colorectal cancer patient. \\nMethodology: This was single centre clinical trial was carried out in the Department of Surgery at Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from November 2013 to April 2014 for a period of six (06) months. Patients of both sex who got admitted in the surgery in-patient department for elective colorectal cancer operations were selected as study population. Both the P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM, physiological score, operative score, predicted mortality rate were calculated using an online POSSUM calculator. Based on both P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM Scoring, patients were categorized into three risk groups. Then a comparative analysis was performed between the observed and the predicted values as well as the Observed/Predicted ratio (O:P) in all the risk groups. \\nResults: A total of 50 patients with the median age of 50 (ranging 20 to 72) years were studied. 30 days overall observed mortality was 3(6%) patients. The mean P-POSSUM and C-POSSUM physiological scores were 32.49±2.08 and 13.92±1.30 respectively. However, the operative score was 11.59±1.46 and 8.12±0.24 in P-POSSUM and C-POSSUM respectively. The overall mortality predicted by the P-POSSUM model was 5 patients (19.33±2.87) and mortality predicted by the Cr-POSSUM model was 4 patients (20.66±4.09). \\nConclusion: In conclusion both model accurately predicted the risk of postoperative death. Cr-POSSUM provided a better fit to observed results than P-POSSUM. \\nJournal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, 2020;6(2): 118-123\",\"PeriodicalId\":16732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jninb.v6i2.50767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jninb.v6i2.50767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:“Portsmouth”改良POSSUM (P-POSSUM)评分系统用于评估普外科患者的死亡率,“Colorectal”Cr-POSSUM评分系统用于评估结直肠患者的死亡率。目的:本研究的目的是评估P-POSSUM (Portsmouth-POSSUM)和Cr-POSSUM(结肠直肠- possum)评分在预测结直肠癌患者死亡风险方面的有效性。方法:本研究为单中心临床试验,于2013年11月至2014年4月在孟加拉国达卡达卡医学院附属医院外科进行,为期6(06)个月。选择在外科住院部接受择期结直肠癌手术的男女患者作为研究人群。使用在线POSSUM计算器计算P-POSSUM和Cr-POSSUM、生理评分、手术评分、预测死亡率。根据P-POSSUM和Cr-POSSUM评分,将患者分为三个风险组。然后比较分析各危险组的观察值与预测值以及观察/预测比(O:P)。结果:共纳入50例患者,中位年龄50岁(20 ~ 72岁)。30天总观察死亡率为3例(6%)。P-POSSUM和C-POSSUM生理评分平均值分别为32.49±2.08和13.92±1.30。P-POSSUM和C-POSSUM的手术评分分别为11.59±1.46和8.12±0.24。P-POSSUM模型预测总死亡率为5例(19.33±2.87),Cr-POSSUM模型预测总死亡率为4例(20.66±4.09)。结论:两种模型均能准确预测术后死亡风险。Cr-POSSUM比P-POSSUM更符合观察结果。孟加拉国国家神经科学研究所学报,2020;6(2):118-123
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Evaluation of P-Possum and Cr-Possum Scores in Patient Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Operation
Background: "Portsmouth" modification of POSSUM (P-POSSUM) scoring system used to assess mortality in general surgical patients and “Colorectal” Cr-POSSUM scoring system used for mortality assessment for colorectal patient. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to estimate the validity of the P-POSSUM (Portsmouth-POSSUM) and Cr-POSSUM (Colorectal-POSSUM) score in predicting the risk of mortality in colorectal cancer patient. Methodology: This was single centre clinical trial was carried out in the Department of Surgery at Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from November 2013 to April 2014 for a period of six (06) months. Patients of both sex who got admitted in the surgery in-patient department for elective colorectal cancer operations were selected as study population. Both the P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM, physiological score, operative score, predicted mortality rate were calculated using an online POSSUM calculator. Based on both P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM Scoring, patients were categorized into three risk groups. Then a comparative analysis was performed between the observed and the predicted values as well as the Observed/Predicted ratio (O:P) in all the risk groups. Results: A total of 50 patients with the median age of 50 (ranging 20 to 72) years were studied. 30 days overall observed mortality was 3(6%) patients. The mean P-POSSUM and C-POSSUM physiological scores were 32.49±2.08 and 13.92±1.30 respectively. However, the operative score was 11.59±1.46 and 8.12±0.24 in P-POSSUM and C-POSSUM respectively. The overall mortality predicted by the P-POSSUM model was 5 patients (19.33±2.87) and mortality predicted by the Cr-POSSUM model was 4 patients (20.66±4.09). Conclusion: In conclusion both model accurately predicted the risk of postoperative death. Cr-POSSUM provided a better fit to observed results than P-POSSUM. Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, 2020;6(2): 118-123
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信