血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂的比较药理学研究。

M. Burnier, M. Maillard
{"title":"血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂的比较药理学研究。","authors":"M. Burnier, M. Maillard","doi":"10.1080/080370501750066444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several orally active non-peptide angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists are now available for the treatment of hypertension. These agents have a common mechanism of action--blockade of the binding of angiotensin II to the subtype 1 receptor--and their binding to this receptor is generally insurmountable. There are some pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between these antagonists, which may reflect in their clinical efficacy, especially at the end of the dosing interval. Losartan has an active metabolite that prolongs its duration of action, and candesartan cilexetil requires conversion to an active form after administration. Telmisartan has the longest duration of action, with a terminal elimination half-life of around 24 h in comparison with 11-15 h for irbesartan, the agent with the next longest half-life. The long duration of action and insurmountable binding to the receptor may be related to the slow dissociation kinetics of the antagonists from the AT1 receptor. Comparative clinical studies suggest that at the recommended dose losartan, the original drug in this class, has a lower antihypertensive efficacy than the newer agents, such as telmisartan. It is possible that these differences between angiotensin II receptor antagonists are due to variations in the degree and duration of receptor blockade, and may be of clinical significance with regard to the cardioprotective and renoprotective effects of this class of antihypertensive agents.","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"260 1","pages":"6-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparative pharmacology of angiotensin II receptor antagonists.\",\"authors\":\"M. Burnier, M. Maillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/080370501750066444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several orally active non-peptide angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists are now available for the treatment of hypertension. These agents have a common mechanism of action--blockade of the binding of angiotensin II to the subtype 1 receptor--and their binding to this receptor is generally insurmountable. There are some pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between these antagonists, which may reflect in their clinical efficacy, especially at the end of the dosing interval. Losartan has an active metabolite that prolongs its duration of action, and candesartan cilexetil requires conversion to an active form after administration. Telmisartan has the longest duration of action, with a terminal elimination half-life of around 24 h in comparison with 11-15 h for irbesartan, the agent with the next longest half-life. The long duration of action and insurmountable binding to the receptor may be related to the slow dissociation kinetics of the antagonists from the AT1 receptor. Comparative clinical studies suggest that at the recommended dose losartan, the original drug in this class, has a lower antihypertensive efficacy than the newer agents, such as telmisartan. It is possible that these differences between angiotensin II receptor antagonists are due to variations in the degree and duration of receptor blockade, and may be of clinical significance with regard to the cardioprotective and renoprotective effects of this class of antihypertensive agents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"260 1\",\"pages\":\"6-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/080370501750066444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/080370501750066444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

几种口服活性非肽血管紧张素II亚型1 (AT1)受体拮抗剂现在可用于治疗高血压。这些药物具有共同的作用机制——阻断血管紧张素II与亚型1受体的结合——并且它们与该受体的结合通常是不可克服的。这些拮抗剂之间存在一些药代动力学和药效学差异,这可能反映在它们的临床疗效上,特别是在给药间隔结束时。氯沙坦有一种活性代谢物,可延长其作用时间,坎地沙坦西蕾地酯在给药后需要转化为活性形式。替米沙坦的作用时间最长,终末半衰期约为24小时,而次之的厄贝沙坦为11-15小时。拮抗剂与AT1受体的缓慢解离动力学可能与作用持续时间长和与受体的不可克服的结合有关。比较临床研究表明,在推荐剂量下,这类药物的原始药物氯沙坦的降压效果低于较新的药物,如替米沙坦。血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂之间的这些差异可能是由于受体阻断程度和持续时间的差异,并且可能对这类降压药的心脏保护和肾保护作用具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The comparative pharmacology of angiotensin II receptor antagonists.
Several orally active non-peptide angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists are now available for the treatment of hypertension. These agents have a common mechanism of action--blockade of the binding of angiotensin II to the subtype 1 receptor--and their binding to this receptor is generally insurmountable. There are some pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between these antagonists, which may reflect in their clinical efficacy, especially at the end of the dosing interval. Losartan has an active metabolite that prolongs its duration of action, and candesartan cilexetil requires conversion to an active form after administration. Telmisartan has the longest duration of action, with a terminal elimination half-life of around 24 h in comparison with 11-15 h for irbesartan, the agent with the next longest half-life. The long duration of action and insurmountable binding to the receptor may be related to the slow dissociation kinetics of the antagonists from the AT1 receptor. Comparative clinical studies suggest that at the recommended dose losartan, the original drug in this class, has a lower antihypertensive efficacy than the newer agents, such as telmisartan. It is possible that these differences between angiotensin II receptor antagonists are due to variations in the degree and duration of receptor blockade, and may be of clinical significance with regard to the cardioprotective and renoprotective effects of this class of antihypertensive agents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信