{"title":"布尔迪厄主义概念与戏剧批评领域","authors":"Martynas Petrikas","doi":"10.7146/NTS.V31I1.112999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of field sociology began their life in humanities, particularly in literature and art studies after publication of his seminal Les règles de l’art: genèse et structure du champ littéraire in 1992. Regretfully, Bourdieu has not left a study dedicated to theatre, possibly due to the long-standing French tradition of considering theatre as another literary genre. Nevertheless, Bourdieusian sociology is abundant with terms, concepts, and ideas that are extremely handy in analyzing and understanding how theatre was produced in the past and is produced in the present. The appropriation of Bourdieu’s ideas for theatre studies is a tempting effort, especially considering how closely theatre is intertwined with the phenomena of habitus, distinction, and all the forms of capital described by Bourdieu himself. The aim of my article is to discuss the applicability of selected Bourdieusian notions and concepts for research of a very specific aspect of theatre studies. I argue that the concepts of field (champs), nomos, doxa, illusio as well as of symbolic violence are very useful in understanding the nature, functions, and effects of theatre criticism. Dwelling on my own theoretical research, I propose to understand theatre criticism as another field of social practice that is definedby the conflict between the opposing interests of t","PeriodicalId":53807,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Theatre Studies","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bourdieusian Concepts and the Field of Theatre Criticism\",\"authors\":\"Martynas Petrikas\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/NTS.V31I1.112999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of field sociology began their life in humanities, particularly in literature and art studies after publication of his seminal Les règles de l’art: genèse et structure du champ littéraire in 1992. Regretfully, Bourdieu has not left a study dedicated to theatre, possibly due to the long-standing French tradition of considering theatre as another literary genre. Nevertheless, Bourdieusian sociology is abundant with terms, concepts, and ideas that are extremely handy in analyzing and understanding how theatre was produced in the past and is produced in the present. The appropriation of Bourdieu’s ideas for theatre studies is a tempting effort, especially considering how closely theatre is intertwined with the phenomena of habitus, distinction, and all the forms of capital described by Bourdieu himself. The aim of my article is to discuss the applicability of selected Bourdieusian notions and concepts for research of a very specific aspect of theatre studies. I argue that the concepts of field (champs), nomos, doxa, illusio as well as of symbolic violence are very useful in understanding the nature, functions, and effects of theatre criticism. Dwelling on my own theoretical research, I propose to understand theatre criticism as another field of social practice that is definedby the conflict between the opposing interests of t\",\"PeriodicalId\":53807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Theatre Studies\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Theatre Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/NTS.V31I1.112999\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Theatre Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/NTS.V31I1.112999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)的场域社会学概念始于人文学科,尤其是在文学和艺术研究领域,这是在他1992年发表的开创性著作《Les rires de l 'art: genires et structure du champ litt擢升》之后。遗憾的是,布迪厄没有留下专门研究戏剧的研究,可能是由于法国长期以来将戏剧视为另一种文学类型的传统。尽管如此,布尔迪乌主义的社会学充满了术语、概念和思想,这些术语、概念和思想对于分析和理解戏剧在过去和现在是如何产生的非常方便。将布迪厄的思想用于戏剧研究是一项诱人的努力,尤其是考虑到戏剧与布迪厄本人所描述的习性、区别和所有资本形式的现象是多么紧密地交织在一起。我这篇文章的目的是讨论选定的布尔迪乌主义的概念和概念对戏剧研究的一个非常具体的方面的研究的适用性。我认为,场(冠军)、nomos、doxa、幻觉以及象征性暴力的概念对于理解戏剧批评的本质、功能和影响非常有用。在我自己的理论研究中,我建议将戏剧批评理解为社会实践的另一个领域,它是由戏剧的对立利益之间的冲突所定义的
Bourdieusian Concepts and the Field of Theatre Criticism
Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of field sociology began their life in humanities, particularly in literature and art studies after publication of his seminal Les règles de l’art: genèse et structure du champ littéraire in 1992. Regretfully, Bourdieu has not left a study dedicated to theatre, possibly due to the long-standing French tradition of considering theatre as another literary genre. Nevertheless, Bourdieusian sociology is abundant with terms, concepts, and ideas that are extremely handy in analyzing and understanding how theatre was produced in the past and is produced in the present. The appropriation of Bourdieu’s ideas for theatre studies is a tempting effort, especially considering how closely theatre is intertwined with the phenomena of habitus, distinction, and all the forms of capital described by Bourdieu himself. The aim of my article is to discuss the applicability of selected Bourdieusian notions and concepts for research of a very specific aspect of theatre studies. I argue that the concepts of field (champs), nomos, doxa, illusio as well as of symbolic violence are very useful in understanding the nature, functions, and effects of theatre criticism. Dwelling on my own theoretical research, I propose to understand theatre criticism as another field of social practice that is definedby the conflict between the opposing interests of t