小心你的愿望:后共产主义司法赋权的警世故事

Q2 Social Sciences

Demokratizatsiya Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.3200/DEMO.18.1.56-73

M. Popova

{"title":"小心你的愿望:后共产主义司法赋权的警世故事","authors":"M. Popova","doi":"10.3200/DEMO.18.1.56-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article aims to curb the enthusiasm for post-Communist judicial empowerment by showing that sometimes a powerful judiciary can threaten the rule of law. It argues that the powerful Bulgarian Constitutional Court promotes conflict between the executive and the ordinary judiciary. The “war of institutions” has made Bulgaria the poster child for failed judicial reforms among new European Union members. Bulgaria’s experience should serve as a cautionary tale for EU candidate countries and show that strengthening the judiciary is not a panacea.","PeriodicalId":39667,"journal":{"name":"Demokratizatsiya","volume":"128 11 1","pages":"56-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Be Careful What You Wish For: A Cautionary Tale of Post-Communist Judicial Empowerment\",\"authors\":\"M. Popova\",\"doi\":\"10.3200/DEMO.18.1.56-73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: This article aims to curb the enthusiasm for post-Communist judicial empowerment by showing that sometimes a powerful judiciary can threaten the rule of law. It argues that the powerful Bulgarian Constitutional Court promotes conflict between the executive and the ordinary judiciary. The “war of institutions” has made Bulgaria the poster child for failed judicial reforms among new European Union members. Bulgaria’s experience should serve as a cautionary tale for EU candidate countries and show that strengthening the judiciary is not a panacea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Demokratizatsiya\",\"volume\":\"128 11 1\",\"pages\":\"56-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Demokratizatsiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.18.1.56-73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demokratizatsiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.18.1.56-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 17

摘要

摘要:本文旨在通过展示强大的司法有时会威胁法治，遏制对后共产主义司法赋权的热情。它认为，强大的保加利亚宪法法院助长了行政部门和普通司法部门之间的冲突。“制度之战”使保加利亚成为欧盟新成员国中司法改革失败的典型代表。保加利亚的经历应该成为欧盟候选国的一个警世故事，并表明加强司法并不是万灵药。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Be Careful What You Wish For: A Cautionary Tale of Post-Communist Judicial Empowerment

Abstract: This article aims to curb the enthusiasm for post-Communist judicial empowerment by showing that sometimes a powerful judiciary can threaten the rule of law. It argues that the powerful Bulgarian Constitutional Court promotes conflict between the executive and the ordinary judiciary. The “war of institutions” has made Bulgaria the poster child for failed judicial reforms among new European Union members. Bulgaria’s experience should serve as a cautionary tale for EU candidate countries and show that strengthening the judiciary is not a panacea.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Demokratizatsiya Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Occupying a unique niche among literary journals, ANQ is filled with short, incisive research-based articles about the literature of the English-speaking world and the language of literature. Contributors unravel obscure allusions, explain sources and analogues, and supply variant manuscript readings. Also included are Old English word studies, textual emendations, and rare correspondence from neglected archives. The journal is an essential source for professors and students, as well as archivists, bibliographers, biographers, editors, lexicographers, and textual scholars. With subjects from Chaucer and Milton to Fitzgerald and Welty, ANQ delves into the heart of literature.