对腐败行为的制裁和责任

A. -
{"title":"对腐败行为的制裁和责任","authors":"A. -","doi":"10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.16237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, the development of perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is not only perpetrate by individuals, but is also often committed by corporations. This behavior can be categorized as a corporate crime, so it has a very broad impact on society. Due to having such a broad impact, the Government began to regulate criminal sanctions for corporations involved in corruption cases. But in reality, there are still decisions that contradict the regulations that have been issued by the Government. One of them is in Decision No. 3/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PT.DKI, which is the focus of this research. In this study, the author uses the concept of accountability and the imposition of criminal sanctions against corporations. Based on the researcher's analysis, the verdict of the decision that imposes criminal sanctions on the management and the corporation may be carried out even though the corporation is not prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor. This was confirmed by the Supreme Court judge's conviction regarding Article 20 paragraph (1) of the Law. No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law. No. 20 of 2001. When using the theory of corporations that act, the management and corporations are responsible, the verdict of Decision No. 3/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PT.DKI can also be justified.","PeriodicalId":31971,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Darussalam Jurnal Pendidikan Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENJATUHAN SANKSI DAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI\",\"authors\":\"A. -\",\"doi\":\"10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.16237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, the development of perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is not only perpetrate by individuals, but is also often committed by corporations. This behavior can be categorized as a corporate crime, so it has a very broad impact on society. Due to having such a broad impact, the Government began to regulate criminal sanctions for corporations involved in corruption cases. But in reality, there are still decisions that contradict the regulations that have been issued by the Government. One of them is in Decision No. 3/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PT.DKI, which is the focus of this research. In this study, the author uses the concept of accountability and the imposition of criminal sanctions against corporations. Based on the researcher's analysis, the verdict of the decision that imposes criminal sanctions on the management and the corporation may be carried out even though the corporation is not prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor. This was confirmed by the Supreme Court judge's conviction regarding Article 20 paragraph (1) of the Law. No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law. No. 20 of 2001. When using the theory of corporations that act, the management and corporations are responsible, the verdict of Decision No. 3/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PT.DKI can also be justified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Darussalam Jurnal Pendidikan Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Darussalam Jurnal Pendidikan Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.16237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Darussalam Jurnal Pendidikan Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.16237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,腐败犯罪行为的行为人的发展不仅是个人所为,而且往往是企业所为。这种行为可以被归类为企业犯罪,因此它对社会的影响非常广泛。由于影响如此广泛,政府开始规管对涉及贪污案件的公司的刑事制裁。但实际上,仍有一些决定与政府颁布的条例相抵触。其中之一是第3/ pid . su - tpk /2018/PT号决议。DKI,这是本研究的重点。在本研究中,作者使用了问责制和对公司实施刑事制裁的概念。根据该研究员的分析,即使没有受到检察机关的起诉,也有可能对管理层和企业进行刑事处罚。最高法院法官对该法第20条第(1)款的判决证实了这一点。经法律修订的1999年第31号法令。2001年第20号。当使用公司行为理论时,管理层和公司负责,第3/ pid . su - tpk /2018/PT号决定的判决。DKI也是有道理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PENJATUHAN SANKSI DAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
Nowadays, the development of perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is not only perpetrate by individuals, but is also often committed by corporations. This behavior can be categorized as a corporate crime, so it has a very broad impact on society. Due to having such a broad impact, the Government began to regulate criminal sanctions for corporations involved in corruption cases. But in reality, there are still decisions that contradict the regulations that have been issued by the Government. One of them is in Decision No. 3/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PT.DKI, which is the focus of this research. In this study, the author uses the concept of accountability and the imposition of criminal sanctions against corporations. Based on the researcher's analysis, the verdict of the decision that imposes criminal sanctions on the management and the corporation may be carried out even though the corporation is not prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor. This was confirmed by the Supreme Court judge's conviction regarding Article 20 paragraph (1) of the Law. No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law. No. 20 of 2001. When using the theory of corporations that act, the management and corporations are responsible, the verdict of Decision No. 3/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PT.DKI can also be justified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信