综合护理——灵丹妙药还是白象?综合护理方法在澳大利亚的回顾在过去的二十年

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
A. Cheetham, S. Arunogiri, D. Lubman
{"title":"综合护理——灵丹妙药还是白象?综合护理方法在澳大利亚的回顾在过去的二十年","authors":"A. Cheetham, S. Arunogiri, D. Lubman","doi":"10.1108/add-10-2022-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIntegrated care is widely supported as a means of improving treatment outcomes for people with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Over the past two decades, Australian state and federal governments have identified integrated care as a policy priority and invested in a number of research and capacity building initiatives. This study aims to examine Australian research evaluating the effectiveness of integrated treatment approaches to provide insight into implications for future research and practice in integrated treatment.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis narrative review examines Australian research evaluating empirical evidence of the effectiveness of integrated treatment approaches within specific populations and evidence from initiatives aimed at integrating care at the service or system level.\n\n\nFindings\nResearch conducted within the Australian context provides considerable evidence to support the effectiveness of integrated approaches to treatment, particularly for people with high prevalence co-occurring disorders or symptoms of these (i.e. anxiety and depression). These have been delivered through various modalities (including online and telephone-based services) to improve health outcomes in a range of populations. However, there is less evidence regarding the effectiveness of specific models or systems of integrated care, including for more severe mental disorders. Despite ongoing efforts on behalf of the Australian government, attempts to sustain system-level initiatives have remained hampered by structural barriers.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nEffective integrated interventions can be delivered by trained clinicians without requiring integration at an organisational or structural level. While there is still considerable work to be done in terms of building sustainable models at a system level, this evidence provides a potential foundation for the development of integrated care models that can be delivered as part of routine practice.\n","PeriodicalId":51922,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated care – panacea or white elephant? A review of integrated care approaches in Australia over the past two decades\",\"authors\":\"A. Cheetham, S. Arunogiri, D. Lubman\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/add-10-2022-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIntegrated care is widely supported as a means of improving treatment outcomes for people with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Over the past two decades, Australian state and federal governments have identified integrated care as a policy priority and invested in a number of research and capacity building initiatives. This study aims to examine Australian research evaluating the effectiveness of integrated treatment approaches to provide insight into implications for future research and practice in integrated treatment.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis narrative review examines Australian research evaluating empirical evidence of the effectiveness of integrated treatment approaches within specific populations and evidence from initiatives aimed at integrating care at the service or system level.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResearch conducted within the Australian context provides considerable evidence to support the effectiveness of integrated approaches to treatment, particularly for people with high prevalence co-occurring disorders or symptoms of these (i.e. anxiety and depression). These have been delivered through various modalities (including online and telephone-based services) to improve health outcomes in a range of populations. However, there is less evidence regarding the effectiveness of specific models or systems of integrated care, including for more severe mental disorders. Despite ongoing efforts on behalf of the Australian government, attempts to sustain system-level initiatives have remained hampered by structural barriers.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nEffective integrated interventions can be delivered by trained clinicians without requiring integration at an organisational or structural level. While there is still considerable work to be done in terms of building sustainable models at a system level, this evidence provides a potential foundation for the development of integrated care models that can be delivered as part of routine practice.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Dual Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Dual Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/add-10-2022-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/add-10-2022-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:综合护理作为改善精神健康和物质使用障碍患者治疗效果的一种手段得到了广泛支持。在过去二十年中,澳大利亚各州和联邦政府已将综合护理确定为一项优先政策,并投资于若干研究和能力建设倡议。本研究旨在考察澳大利亚综合治疗方法有效性的评估研究,为综合治疗的未来研究和实践提供启示。设计/方法/方法本综述考察了澳大利亚的研究,评估了综合治疗方法在特定人群中的有效性的经验证据,以及旨在在服务或系统层面整合护理的举措的证据。在澳大利亚开展的研究提供了相当多的证据,支持综合治疗方法的有效性,特别是对那些同时出现疾病或这些症状(即焦虑和抑郁)的高发患者。这些服务通过各种方式(包括在线和电话服务)提供,以改善一系列人群的健康结果。然而,关于具体模式或综合护理系统的有效性的证据较少,包括对更严重的精神障碍的有效性。尽管代表澳大利亚政府不断努力,但维持系统级倡议的尝试仍然受到结构性障碍的阻碍。原创性/价值经过培训的临床医生可以提供有效的综合干预措施,而无需在组织或结构层面进行整合。虽然在系统层面建立可持续模式方面仍有大量工作要做,但这一证据为开发可作为常规实践一部分提供的综合护理模式提供了潜在基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrated care – panacea or white elephant? A review of integrated care approaches in Australia over the past two decades
Purpose Integrated care is widely supported as a means of improving treatment outcomes for people with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Over the past two decades, Australian state and federal governments have identified integrated care as a policy priority and invested in a number of research and capacity building initiatives. This study aims to examine Australian research evaluating the effectiveness of integrated treatment approaches to provide insight into implications for future research and practice in integrated treatment. Design/methodology/approach This narrative review examines Australian research evaluating empirical evidence of the effectiveness of integrated treatment approaches within specific populations and evidence from initiatives aimed at integrating care at the service or system level. Findings Research conducted within the Australian context provides considerable evidence to support the effectiveness of integrated approaches to treatment, particularly for people with high prevalence co-occurring disorders or symptoms of these (i.e. anxiety and depression). These have been delivered through various modalities (including online and telephone-based services) to improve health outcomes in a range of populations. However, there is less evidence regarding the effectiveness of specific models or systems of integrated care, including for more severe mental disorders. Despite ongoing efforts on behalf of the Australian government, attempts to sustain system-level initiatives have remained hampered by structural barriers. Originality/value Effective integrated interventions can be delivered by trained clinicians without requiring integration at an organisational or structural level. While there is still considerable work to be done in terms of building sustainable models at a system level, this evidence provides a potential foundation for the development of integrated care models that can be delivered as part of routine practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Dual Diagnosis
Advances in Dual Diagnosis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信