多酶法测定选定动植物食品的体外蛋白质消化率

Sulagna Bandyopadhyay, R. Kuriyan, A. Kurpad
{"title":"多酶法测定选定动植物食品的体外蛋白质消化率","authors":"Sulagna Bandyopadhyay, R. Kuriyan, A. Kurpad","doi":"10.21048/ijnd.2021.58.4.28944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent Food and Agricultural Organization / World Health Organization United Nations University expert consultations on protein quality have emphasized the need for protein digestibility measurements in humans. The standard in vivo oro-ileal protein digestibility measurements are invasive, expensive, time-consuming and burdensome on participants. The in vitro multi-enzyme based assays have been a promising tool for rapid, non-invasive and cost-effective protein digestibility measurements in foods. The digestibility estimates obtained from these methods have not been compared with true ileal digestibility measurements in humans. This study measured in vitro protein digestibility in selected commonly consumed plant and animal proteins, assessed the effect of heat-treatment on protein digestibility and compared the digestibility estimates with previously published human true ileal protein digestibility values. The in vitro protein digestibility in the raw plant proteins ranged from 35% in pigeon pea to 72% in rice. Cooking improved digestibility by 8% in potato to 26% in pigeon pea. The in vitro protein digestibility in freeze dried and spray dried milk powder were €85% which reduced to 73% after heat-treatment at 120°C for 40 minutes. The mean difference between the in vitro protein digestibility coefficients and the true ileal protein digestibility estimates was 4.3% (95% CI:-1.05, 9.74%). Although, the in vitro assays can be used as useful tools to predict ileal digestibility in humans, and to rank food proteins according to their digestibility, further studies are warranted for inter-laboratory validation of assays with appropriate evaluation on same protein sources against true ileal digestibility measured in humans.","PeriodicalId":22457,"journal":{"name":"The Indian journal of nutrition and dietetics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Protein Digestibility of Selected Plant and Animal Foods by Multi-Enzyme Assay\",\"authors\":\"Sulagna Bandyopadhyay, R. Kuriyan, A. Kurpad\",\"doi\":\"10.21048/ijnd.2021.58.4.28944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent Food and Agricultural Organization / World Health Organization United Nations University expert consultations on protein quality have emphasized the need for protein digestibility measurements in humans. The standard in vivo oro-ileal protein digestibility measurements are invasive, expensive, time-consuming and burdensome on participants. The in vitro multi-enzyme based assays have been a promising tool for rapid, non-invasive and cost-effective protein digestibility measurements in foods. The digestibility estimates obtained from these methods have not been compared with true ileal digestibility measurements in humans. This study measured in vitro protein digestibility in selected commonly consumed plant and animal proteins, assessed the effect of heat-treatment on protein digestibility and compared the digestibility estimates with previously published human true ileal protein digestibility values. The in vitro protein digestibility in the raw plant proteins ranged from 35% in pigeon pea to 72% in rice. Cooking improved digestibility by 8% in potato to 26% in pigeon pea. The in vitro protein digestibility in freeze dried and spray dried milk powder were €85% which reduced to 73% after heat-treatment at 120°C for 40 minutes. The mean difference between the in vitro protein digestibility coefficients and the true ileal protein digestibility estimates was 4.3% (95% CI:-1.05, 9.74%). Although, the in vitro assays can be used as useful tools to predict ileal digestibility in humans, and to rank food proteins according to their digestibility, further studies are warranted for inter-laboratory validation of assays with appropriate evaluation on same protein sources against true ileal digestibility measured in humans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Indian journal of nutrition and dietetics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Indian journal of nutrition and dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21048/ijnd.2021.58.4.28944\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian journal of nutrition and dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21048/ijnd.2021.58.4.28944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近举行的粮食及农业组织/世界卫生组织联合国大学关于蛋白质质量的专家磋商会强调了测量人体蛋白质消化率的必要性。标准的体内口回肠蛋白质消化率测量是侵入性的、昂贵的、耗时的,而且对参与者来说是负担。体外多酶法是一种快速、无创、经济有效的食品蛋白质消化率测定方法。从这些方法获得的消化率估计值尚未与真实的人类回肠消化率测量值进行比较。本研究测量了选定的常用植物和动物蛋白质的体外蛋白质消化率,评估了热处理对蛋白质消化率的影响,并将消化率估值与先前发表的人类回肠蛋白质真实消化率值进行了比较。原料植物蛋白的体外消化率为鸽豆的35% ~大米的72%。煮熟后,马铃薯的消化率提高了8%,鸽豆的消化率提高了26%。冷冻干燥奶粉和喷雾干燥奶粉的体外蛋白质消化率为85%,经120℃热处理40 min后,蛋白质消化率降至73%。体外蛋白质消化率系数与真实回肠蛋白质消化率估计值的平均差异为4.3% (95% CI:-1.05, 9.74%)。尽管体外测定可以作为预测人类回肠消化率的有用工具,并根据其消化率对食物蛋白质进行排名,但需要进一步的研究来验证实验室间的测定,对相同蛋白质来源进行适当的评估,以对比人类真实的回肠消化率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Protein Digestibility of Selected Plant and Animal Foods by Multi-Enzyme Assay
The recent Food and Agricultural Organization / World Health Organization United Nations University expert consultations on protein quality have emphasized the need for protein digestibility measurements in humans. The standard in vivo oro-ileal protein digestibility measurements are invasive, expensive, time-consuming and burdensome on participants. The in vitro multi-enzyme based assays have been a promising tool for rapid, non-invasive and cost-effective protein digestibility measurements in foods. The digestibility estimates obtained from these methods have not been compared with true ileal digestibility measurements in humans. This study measured in vitro protein digestibility in selected commonly consumed plant and animal proteins, assessed the effect of heat-treatment on protein digestibility and compared the digestibility estimates with previously published human true ileal protein digestibility values. The in vitro protein digestibility in the raw plant proteins ranged from 35% in pigeon pea to 72% in rice. Cooking improved digestibility by 8% in potato to 26% in pigeon pea. The in vitro protein digestibility in freeze dried and spray dried milk powder were €85% which reduced to 73% after heat-treatment at 120°C for 40 minutes. The mean difference between the in vitro protein digestibility coefficients and the true ileal protein digestibility estimates was 4.3% (95% CI:-1.05, 9.74%). Although, the in vitro assays can be used as useful tools to predict ileal digestibility in humans, and to rank food proteins according to their digestibility, further studies are warranted for inter-laboratory validation of assays with appropriate evaluation on same protein sources against true ileal digestibility measured in humans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信