{"title":"惩罚和社会规范。论实验经济学中惩罚的生态有效性,第一部分","authors":"Maximiliano Senci","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: El presente articulo es la primera parte de un trabajo que estudia la conexion entre el castigo y las normas en estudios experimentales en economia. Estos asumen que la transgresion de normas de justicia y equidad es la causa de la aplicacion del castigo. A pesar de que hay evidencia empirica que refuerza tal conexion, existen razones para pensar que su validez ecologica puede verse socavada debido a ciertos artefactos experimentales. Estos artefactos experimentales se refieren a dos conjuntos de problemas vinculados con la validez ecologica: primero, la “irrelevancia normativa” del castigo, esto es, que los participantes de los juegos economicos experimentales utilizan la opcion de castigo por motivos no relacionados a la transgresion de normas; y segundo, la ilegitimidad del castigo, producto de la falta de procedimientos adecuados para la asignacion de roles y de la ambiguedad normativa. EnglishAbstract: This article focuses on the connection between punishment and norms. Experimental studies in economics assume that transgression of norms of justice and equity is the cause of the application of punishment. While such a connection is evident, there are reasons to believe that external validity of such inference may be undermined due to certain experimental artefacts. These experimental artefacts refer to two sets of problems linked to ecological validity: first, the \"normative irrelevance\" of punishment, that is, that participants in experimental economic games use the option of punishment for reasons unrelated to the transgression of norms; and second, the illegitimacy of punishment, as a result of the lack of adequate procedures to the allocation of roles and normative ambiguity. I conclude with recommendations about how to tackle these problems.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Castigo y normas sociales. Acerca de la validez ecológica del castigo en la economía experimental, parte I\",\"authors\":\"Maximiliano Senci\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolResumen: El presente articulo es la primera parte de un trabajo que estudia la conexion entre el castigo y las normas en estudios experimentales en economia. Estos asumen que la transgresion de normas de justicia y equidad es la causa de la aplicacion del castigo. A pesar de que hay evidencia empirica que refuerza tal conexion, existen razones para pensar que su validez ecologica puede verse socavada debido a ciertos artefactos experimentales. Estos artefactos experimentales se refieren a dos conjuntos de problemas vinculados con la validez ecologica: primero, la “irrelevancia normativa” del castigo, esto es, que los participantes de los juegos economicos experimentales utilizan la opcion de castigo por motivos no relacionados a la transgresion de normas; y segundo, la ilegitimidad del castigo, producto de la falta de procedimientos adecuados para la asignacion de roles y de la ambiguedad normativa. EnglishAbstract: This article focuses on the connection between punishment and norms. Experimental studies in economics assume that transgression of norms of justice and equity is the cause of the application of punishment. While such a connection is evident, there are reasons to believe that external validity of such inference may be undermined due to certain experimental artefacts. These experimental artefacts refer to two sets of problems linked to ecological validity: first, the \\\"normative irrelevance\\\" of punishment, that is, that participants in experimental economic games use the option of punishment for reasons unrelated to the transgression of norms; and second, the illegitimacy of punishment, as a result of the lack of adequate procedures to the allocation of roles and normative ambiguity. I conclude with recommendations about how to tackle these problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cinta de Moebio\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cinta de Moebio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Castigo y normas sociales. Acerca de la validez ecológica del castigo en la economía experimental, parte I
espanolResumen: El presente articulo es la primera parte de un trabajo que estudia la conexion entre el castigo y las normas en estudios experimentales en economia. Estos asumen que la transgresion de normas de justicia y equidad es la causa de la aplicacion del castigo. A pesar de que hay evidencia empirica que refuerza tal conexion, existen razones para pensar que su validez ecologica puede verse socavada debido a ciertos artefactos experimentales. Estos artefactos experimentales se refieren a dos conjuntos de problemas vinculados con la validez ecologica: primero, la “irrelevancia normativa” del castigo, esto es, que los participantes de los juegos economicos experimentales utilizan la opcion de castigo por motivos no relacionados a la transgresion de normas; y segundo, la ilegitimidad del castigo, producto de la falta de procedimientos adecuados para la asignacion de roles y de la ambiguedad normativa. EnglishAbstract: This article focuses on the connection between punishment and norms. Experimental studies in economics assume that transgression of norms of justice and equity is the cause of the application of punishment. While such a connection is evident, there are reasons to believe that external validity of such inference may be undermined due to certain experimental artefacts. These experimental artefacts refer to two sets of problems linked to ecological validity: first, the "normative irrelevance" of punishment, that is, that participants in experimental economic games use the option of punishment for reasons unrelated to the transgression of norms; and second, the illegitimacy of punishment, as a result of the lack of adequate procedures to the allocation of roles and normative ambiguity. I conclude with recommendations about how to tackle these problems.
期刊介绍:
Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.