《红色恐慌:美国本土恐怖分子》作者:乔安妮·巴克

IF 2.5 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Pablo Millalen Lepin
{"title":"《红色恐慌:美国本土恐怖分子》作者:乔安妮·巴克","authors":"Pablo Millalen Lepin","doi":"10.1353/nai.2023.a904187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"S P R I N G & F A L L 2 0 2 0 W I C A Z O S A R E V I E W US empire defines terrorism as the “unlawful” use of violence, fear, and intimidation, particularly against civilians, in the pursuit of ideological or political aims. The term primarily refers to intentional violence and is used most often in the context of war; however, terror and terrorism in relation to Indigenous people are reproduced differently under the US/Canadian settler empire. What does it mean to call Indigenous people terrorists on their own land? This is a question Lenape feminist Joanne Barker addresses in Red Scare: The State’s Indigenous Terrorist, noting, “Indigenous People are identified and made identifiable by the state as terrorists in order to advance imperialist objectives” (p. vii). Two defining concepts she uses, the Murderable Indian and the Kinless Indian, are meant to be identifiers for how Indianness is “terrorism” and therefore justifies the genocide and Indigenous removal from their lands. The Indigenous feminist framework which Barker takes up disentangles settler policies, signifiers, and language used for antiterrorist laws and sentiments. Terror and the fear-driving discourses of settler empire reinforce a designation for settler justifications and weaponizing for harsher sentencing of the state’s exploitation, policing, and violence under the systems of colonialism and capitalism. In the US and Canadian contexts, terrorism and terrorists are defined exclusively within settler political order. Thus, the “red scare” embodies the full spectrum of settler racism and xenophobic fear that justifies war-making against Indigenous people. The racism and fear further perpetuates into a belief that security and social stability Red Scare: The State’s Indigenous Terrorist by Joanne Barker University of California Press, 2021","PeriodicalId":41647,"journal":{"name":"NAIS-Native American and Indigenous Studies Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Red Scare: The State's Indigenous Terrorist by Joanne Barker (review)\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Millalen Lepin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/nai.2023.a904187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"S P R I N G & F A L L 2 0 2 0 W I C A Z O S A R E V I E W US empire defines terrorism as the “unlawful” use of violence, fear, and intimidation, particularly against civilians, in the pursuit of ideological or political aims. The term primarily refers to intentional violence and is used most often in the context of war; however, terror and terrorism in relation to Indigenous people are reproduced differently under the US/Canadian settler empire. What does it mean to call Indigenous people terrorists on their own land? This is a question Lenape feminist Joanne Barker addresses in Red Scare: The State’s Indigenous Terrorist, noting, “Indigenous People are identified and made identifiable by the state as terrorists in order to advance imperialist objectives” (p. vii). Two defining concepts she uses, the Murderable Indian and the Kinless Indian, are meant to be identifiers for how Indianness is “terrorism” and therefore justifies the genocide and Indigenous removal from their lands. The Indigenous feminist framework which Barker takes up disentangles settler policies, signifiers, and language used for antiterrorist laws and sentiments. Terror and the fear-driving discourses of settler empire reinforce a designation for settler justifications and weaponizing for harsher sentencing of the state’s exploitation, policing, and violence under the systems of colonialism and capitalism. In the US and Canadian contexts, terrorism and terrorists are defined exclusively within settler political order. Thus, the “red scare” embodies the full spectrum of settler racism and xenophobic fear that justifies war-making against Indigenous people. The racism and fear further perpetuates into a belief that security and social stability Red Scare: The State’s Indigenous Terrorist by Joanne Barker University of California Press, 2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":41647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NAIS-Native American and Indigenous Studies Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NAIS-Native American and Indigenous Studies Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/nai.2023.a904187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAIS-Native American and Indigenous Studies Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nai.2023.a904187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

美国帝国将恐怖主义定义为“非法”使用暴力,恐惧和恐吓,特别是针对平民,以追求意识形态或政治目的。该术语主要指故意暴力,最常用于战争背景;然而,与土著人民有关的恐怖主义和恐怖主义在美国/加拿大移民帝国下以不同的方式再现。在自己的土地上称土著人为恐怖分子是什么意思?这是Lenape女权主义者Joanne Barker在《红色恐惧:国家的土著恐怖分子》中提出的问题,她指出,“为了推进帝国主义的目标,土著人民被国家认定并被认定为恐怖分子”(第vii页)。她使用了两个定义概念,可谋杀的印第安人和无亲属的印第安人,这意味着印度人是“恐怖主义”的标志,因此证明种族灭绝和土著从他们的土地上被驱逐是合理的。巴克采用的土著女权主义框架将定居者政策、能指和用于反恐法律和情绪的语言分离开来。在殖民主义和资本主义制度下,恐怖主义和恐惧驱动的话语强化了定居者的正当性,并使国家的剥削、治安和暴力行为得到更严厉的判决。在美国和加拿大的背景下,恐怖主义和恐怖分子完全是在定居者的政治秩序中定义的。因此,“红色恐慌”体现了定居者种族主义和仇外恐惧的全部范围,这些都是对土著人民发动战争的理由。种族主义和恐惧进一步延续了一种信念,即安全和社会稳定的红色恐慌:加州大学出版社,乔安妮巴克,2021年
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Red Scare: The State's Indigenous Terrorist by Joanne Barker (review)
S P R I N G & F A L L 2 0 2 0 W I C A Z O S A R E V I E W US empire defines terrorism as the “unlawful” use of violence, fear, and intimidation, particularly against civilians, in the pursuit of ideological or political aims. The term primarily refers to intentional violence and is used most often in the context of war; however, terror and terrorism in relation to Indigenous people are reproduced differently under the US/Canadian settler empire. What does it mean to call Indigenous people terrorists on their own land? This is a question Lenape feminist Joanne Barker addresses in Red Scare: The State’s Indigenous Terrorist, noting, “Indigenous People are identified and made identifiable by the state as terrorists in order to advance imperialist objectives” (p. vii). Two defining concepts she uses, the Murderable Indian and the Kinless Indian, are meant to be identifiers for how Indianness is “terrorism” and therefore justifies the genocide and Indigenous removal from their lands. The Indigenous feminist framework which Barker takes up disentangles settler policies, signifiers, and language used for antiterrorist laws and sentiments. Terror and the fear-driving discourses of settler empire reinforce a designation for settler justifications and weaponizing for harsher sentencing of the state’s exploitation, policing, and violence under the systems of colonialism and capitalism. In the US and Canadian contexts, terrorism and terrorists are defined exclusively within settler political order. Thus, the “red scare” embodies the full spectrum of settler racism and xenophobic fear that justifies war-making against Indigenous people. The racism and fear further perpetuates into a belief that security and social stability Red Scare: The State’s Indigenous Terrorist by Joanne Barker University of California Press, 2021
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信