{"title":"阅读的思想","authors":"Christine Lehleiter","doi":"10.3138/seminar.58.1.intro","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mind is a beautiful object of study. And the study of the mind is likely as old as human society itself. The origin story in the Abrahamic tradition tells of such first mindreading when Eve uses her ability to guess and kindle Adam’s desires to try the forbidden fruit—an act that bestows the ability for self-awareness, albeit leading to the shameful expulsion from the garden of Eden. Throughout history, the understanding of the human mind—here vaguely defined as an entity that unites faculties such as cognition, imagination, memory, and emotion (see “Mind”)—has taken many different forms. Religion, philosophy, and psychology are disciplines that have traditionally focused on its study, but quantitative and computational approaches have gained new prominence in exploring its properties. In Western thought, there exists a long and complex tradition to account for the mind within a dualistic framework. In this thinking, body and mind are considered two forces in tension with each other, the moral imperative being that the spiritual force ultimately overcomes the materiality of the body, which corrupts its integrity. And for important stretches of Western philosophy, the mind has been considered to be best studied by exercises of self-reflection, so much so that the epistemological conundrum implied in this approach was turned on its head by René Descartes by arguing that it provided the only possible certainty (Discours de la Méthode, 1637). But Descartes’s understanding of the human being as a thinking being still insisted on a split between “animal” machine and “human” mind that had already become problematic for him and contemporary thinkers. While often quoted and condemned for its reductive understanding of humanity, Julien Offray de La Mettrie’s L’Homme Machine (1747), which further explored Descartes’s suggestions, is less an apology for materialism than the expression of a deep uncertainty about how to conceptualize the human mind in the wake of secularization. The fear that approaches such as that of La Mettrie would coincide with a deterministic understanding of the human being—with all its ethical and legal implications—was immense, but the floodgates to rooting the mind in the fleshy matter of the body and its machine-like conception were opened. The attempts to locate the mind not in the soul but in the organ of the brain and its nervous extensions were increasingly accompanied by the conviction that the mind can be studied by methods that rely on sense perception and common experience (see Breidbach). While we know of early attempts to study the materiality of thought in the Western tradition (plates such as the one","PeriodicalId":44556,"journal":{"name":"SEMINAR-A JOURNAL OF GERMANIC STUDIES","volume":"26 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Minds\",\"authors\":\"Christine Lehleiter\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/seminar.58.1.intro\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mind is a beautiful object of study. And the study of the mind is likely as old as human society itself. The origin story in the Abrahamic tradition tells of such first mindreading when Eve uses her ability to guess and kindle Adam’s desires to try the forbidden fruit—an act that bestows the ability for self-awareness, albeit leading to the shameful expulsion from the garden of Eden. Throughout history, the understanding of the human mind—here vaguely defined as an entity that unites faculties such as cognition, imagination, memory, and emotion (see “Mind”)—has taken many different forms. Religion, philosophy, and psychology are disciplines that have traditionally focused on its study, but quantitative and computational approaches have gained new prominence in exploring its properties. In Western thought, there exists a long and complex tradition to account for the mind within a dualistic framework. In this thinking, body and mind are considered two forces in tension with each other, the moral imperative being that the spiritual force ultimately overcomes the materiality of the body, which corrupts its integrity. And for important stretches of Western philosophy, the mind has been considered to be best studied by exercises of self-reflection, so much so that the epistemological conundrum implied in this approach was turned on its head by René Descartes by arguing that it provided the only possible certainty (Discours de la Méthode, 1637). But Descartes’s understanding of the human being as a thinking being still insisted on a split between “animal” machine and “human” mind that had already become problematic for him and contemporary thinkers. While often quoted and condemned for its reductive understanding of humanity, Julien Offray de La Mettrie’s L’Homme Machine (1747), which further explored Descartes’s suggestions, is less an apology for materialism than the expression of a deep uncertainty about how to conceptualize the human mind in the wake of secularization. The fear that approaches such as that of La Mettrie would coincide with a deterministic understanding of the human being—with all its ethical and legal implications—was immense, but the floodgates to rooting the mind in the fleshy matter of the body and its machine-like conception were opened. The attempts to locate the mind not in the soul but in the organ of the brain and its nervous extensions were increasingly accompanied by the conviction that the mind can be studied by methods that rely on sense perception and common experience (see Breidbach). While we know of early attempts to study the materiality of thought in the Western tradition (plates such as the one\",\"PeriodicalId\":44556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SEMINAR-A JOURNAL OF GERMANIC STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SEMINAR-A JOURNAL OF GERMANIC STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/seminar.58.1.intro\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEMINAR-A JOURNAL OF GERMANIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/seminar.58.1.intro","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心灵是一个美丽的研究对象。对心智的研究可能和人类社会本身一样古老。亚伯拉罕传统的起源故事讲述了这样的第一次读心术,当夏娃用她的能力猜测并点燃亚当尝试禁果的欲望时,这种行为赋予了自我意识的能力,尽管会导致被可耻地逐出伊甸园。纵观历史,对人类心灵的理解——这里模糊地定义为一个结合了认知、想象、记忆和情感等能力的实体(见“心灵”)——有许多不同的形式。宗教、哲学和心理学是传统上关注其研究的学科,但定量和计算方法在探索其性质方面获得了新的突出地位。在西方思想中,存在着一个悠久而复杂的传统,即在二元框架中解释心灵。在这种思想中,身体和心灵被认为是两种相互紧张的力量,道德上的要求是精神力量最终克服了身体的物质性,这破坏了身体的完整性。对于西方哲学的重要延伸,心灵一直被认为是最好的研究自我反思的练习,以至于这种方法所隐含的认识论难题被ren·笛卡尔(笛卡尔)推翻,他认为它提供了唯一可能的确定性(diss de la m thode, 1637)。但是笛卡尔对人类作为一种思维存在的理解仍然坚持将“动物”、“机器”和“人”的思维分开,这对他和同时代的思想家来说已经成为一个问题。虽然由于对人性的简化理解而经常被引用和谴责,但进一步探讨了笛卡尔观点的于连·奥弗雷·德·拉·梅特里(Julien Offray de La Mettrie)的《人的机器》(L’homme Machine, 1747)与其说是对唯物主义的道歉,不如说是对如何在世俗化之后将人类心灵概念化的深刻不确定性的表达。人们担心像拉梅特里这样的方法会与对人类的决定论的理解相吻合——以及它所有的伦理和法律含义——这是巨大的,但将思想根植于肉体的血肉物质及其类似机器的概念的闸门打开了。将精神定位于大脑器官及其神经延伸而不是灵魂的尝试,越来越多地伴随着一种信念,即精神可以通过依赖感官知觉和共同经验的方法来研究(见Breidbach)。虽然我们知道早期试图研究西方传统中思想的物质性(比如这个板块)
The mind is a beautiful object of study. And the study of the mind is likely as old as human society itself. The origin story in the Abrahamic tradition tells of such first mindreading when Eve uses her ability to guess and kindle Adam’s desires to try the forbidden fruit—an act that bestows the ability for self-awareness, albeit leading to the shameful expulsion from the garden of Eden. Throughout history, the understanding of the human mind—here vaguely defined as an entity that unites faculties such as cognition, imagination, memory, and emotion (see “Mind”)—has taken many different forms. Religion, philosophy, and psychology are disciplines that have traditionally focused on its study, but quantitative and computational approaches have gained new prominence in exploring its properties. In Western thought, there exists a long and complex tradition to account for the mind within a dualistic framework. In this thinking, body and mind are considered two forces in tension with each other, the moral imperative being that the spiritual force ultimately overcomes the materiality of the body, which corrupts its integrity. And for important stretches of Western philosophy, the mind has been considered to be best studied by exercises of self-reflection, so much so that the epistemological conundrum implied in this approach was turned on its head by René Descartes by arguing that it provided the only possible certainty (Discours de la Méthode, 1637). But Descartes’s understanding of the human being as a thinking being still insisted on a split between “animal” machine and “human” mind that had already become problematic for him and contemporary thinkers. While often quoted and condemned for its reductive understanding of humanity, Julien Offray de La Mettrie’s L’Homme Machine (1747), which further explored Descartes’s suggestions, is less an apology for materialism than the expression of a deep uncertainty about how to conceptualize the human mind in the wake of secularization. The fear that approaches such as that of La Mettrie would coincide with a deterministic understanding of the human being—with all its ethical and legal implications—was immense, but the floodgates to rooting the mind in the fleshy matter of the body and its machine-like conception were opened. The attempts to locate the mind not in the soul but in the organ of the brain and its nervous extensions were increasingly accompanied by the conviction that the mind can be studied by methods that rely on sense perception and common experience (see Breidbach). While we know of early attempts to study the materiality of thought in the Western tradition (plates such as the one
期刊介绍:
The first issue of Seminar appeared in the Spring of 1965, sponsored jointly by the Canadian Association of University Teachers of German (CAUTG) and the German Section of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association (AULLA). This collaborative sponsorship has continued to the present day, with the Journal essentially a Canadian scholarly journal, its Editors all Canadian, likewise its publisher, and managerial and editorial decisions taken by the Editor and/or the Canadian Editorial Committee,the Australasian Associate Editor being responsible for the selection of articles submitted from that area.