给予重夺:为海岸地区私有财产权益的公共收购提供资金

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Daniel D. Barnhizer
{"title":"给予重夺:为海岸地区私有财产权益的公共收购提供资金","authors":"Daniel D. Barnhizer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.436700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article explores the feasibility of using \"givings recapture mechanisms\" to promote effective land use management on coastal floodplains. Specifically, current government responses to floods and flood risks - typified by regulatory restrictions on floodplain land use, structural protections, and flood insurance or disaster relief - transfer substantial \"givings\" to private property owners. These givings have dramatically increased the value of coastal properties and continue to promote or maintain in place unwise and unsustainable coastal floodplain development. Ironically, increased coastal property values resulting from such givings have rendered prohibitively costly one land use management technique that has proven effective at reducing flood losses - public acquisition of high-risk or environmentally sensitive private property. While many scholars and commentators have approached this problem from the perspective of eliminating subsidization of floodplain development, my analysis is unique in that it recommends that government attempt to recapture past givings by offsetting those givings as a credit against the compensation the government must pay when it acquires private floodplain property. Such an approach would protect legitimate investment-backed expectations of landowners while effecting a long-term retreat from coastal floodplains threatened by rising sea levels and increasing hurricane risks.","PeriodicalId":45668,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Environmental Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Givings Recapture: Funding Public Acquisition of Private Property Interests on the Coasts\",\"authors\":\"Daniel D. Barnhizer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.436700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article explores the feasibility of using \\\"givings recapture mechanisms\\\" to promote effective land use management on coastal floodplains. Specifically, current government responses to floods and flood risks - typified by regulatory restrictions on floodplain land use, structural protections, and flood insurance or disaster relief - transfer substantial \\\"givings\\\" to private property owners. These givings have dramatically increased the value of coastal properties and continue to promote or maintain in place unwise and unsustainable coastal floodplain development. Ironically, increased coastal property values resulting from such givings have rendered prohibitively costly one land use management technique that has proven effective at reducing flood losses - public acquisition of high-risk or environmentally sensitive private property. While many scholars and commentators have approached this problem from the perspective of eliminating subsidization of floodplain development, my analysis is unique in that it recommends that government attempt to recapture past givings by offsetting those givings as a credit against the compensation the government must pay when it acquires private floodplain property. Such an approach would protect legitimate investment-backed expectations of landowners while effecting a long-term retreat from coastal floodplains threatened by rising sea levels and increasing hurricane risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Environmental Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Environmental Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.436700\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.436700","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文探讨了在沿海洪泛平原利用“给予-再获取机制”促进有效土地利用管理的可行性。具体来说,当前政府对洪水和洪水风险的反应——典型的是对洪泛区土地使用、结构保护、洪水保险或救灾的监管限制——将大量的“赠与”转移给了私人财产所有者。这些捐赠极大地增加了沿海财产的价值,并继续促进或维持不明智和不可持续的沿海洪泛平原开发。具有讽刺意味的是,由于这种捐赠而增加的沿海财产价值,使一种土地使用管理技术——公共收购高风险或对环境敏感的私人财产——变得昂贵得令人难以承受,而这种技术已被证明对减少洪水损失是有效的。虽然许多学者和评论家都是从取消对洪泛区开发的补贴的角度来处理这个问题的,但我的分析是独特的,因为它建议政府尝试通过将这些补贴作为抵扣政府在获得私人洪泛区财产时必须支付的补偿来重新获得过去的补贴。这种方法将保护土地所有者合法的投资支持的期望,同时实现从沿海洪泛平原的长期撤退,这些洪泛平原受到海平面上升和飓风风险增加的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Givings Recapture: Funding Public Acquisition of Private Property Interests on the Coasts
This Article explores the feasibility of using "givings recapture mechanisms" to promote effective land use management on coastal floodplains. Specifically, current government responses to floods and flood risks - typified by regulatory restrictions on floodplain land use, structural protections, and flood insurance or disaster relief - transfer substantial "givings" to private property owners. These givings have dramatically increased the value of coastal properties and continue to promote or maintain in place unwise and unsustainable coastal floodplain development. Ironically, increased coastal property values resulting from such givings have rendered prohibitively costly one land use management technique that has proven effective at reducing flood losses - public acquisition of high-risk or environmentally sensitive private property. While many scholars and commentators have approached this problem from the perspective of eliminating subsidization of floodplain development, my analysis is unique in that it recommends that government attempt to recapture past givings by offsetting those givings as a credit against the compensation the government must pay when it acquires private floodplain property. Such an approach would protect legitimate investment-backed expectations of landowners while effecting a long-term retreat from coastal floodplains threatened by rising sea levels and increasing hurricane risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Harvard Environmental Law Review is published semiannually by Harvard Law School students. Views expressed in the Review are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of HELR members. Editorial Policy: HELR has adopted a broad view of environmental affairs to include such areas as land use and property rights; air, water, and noise regula-tion; toxic substances control; radiation control; energy use; workplace pollution; science and technology control; and resource use and regulation. HELR is interested in developments on the local, state, federal, foreign, or international levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信