医疗保健设计:翻译的挑战

J. West
{"title":"医疗保健设计:翻译的挑战","authors":"J. West","doi":"10.1080/24735132.2020.1783880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper draws on the history of inclusive design and design for patient safety work at the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design at the Royal College of Art to illustrate translational difficulties facing product designs developed with and initiated by clinical researchers. Three case studies are explored to outline common challenges faced by innovations in the efforts to commercialise and achieve adoption into front line use. Translational difficulties were discussed in a multidisciplinary workshop with designers, human factors, regulatory and procurement personnel. The differences between the conceptions of the design process and the process by which innovations are adopted into widespread use were explored in more detail through mapping exercises and a pilot design project. The paper uses the case studies and a workshop to draw on theory of design and models for optimising translation, with a particular focus on procurement and incremental innovation. The conclusion is a proposed methodology for optimising the inclusive design process in healthcare to produce innovations which are more likely to be adopted into front line use. The methodology involves downstream stakeholders (namely regulatory and procurement expertise) in addition to the standard front line users, building in ambition from incremental to more fundamental innovations.","PeriodicalId":92348,"journal":{"name":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","volume":"14 2 1","pages":"252 - 269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design in healthcare: the challenge of translation\",\"authors\":\"J. West\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24735132.2020.1783880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper draws on the history of inclusive design and design for patient safety work at the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design at the Royal College of Art to illustrate translational difficulties facing product designs developed with and initiated by clinical researchers. Three case studies are explored to outline common challenges faced by innovations in the efforts to commercialise and achieve adoption into front line use. Translational difficulties were discussed in a multidisciplinary workshop with designers, human factors, regulatory and procurement personnel. The differences between the conceptions of the design process and the process by which innovations are adopted into widespread use were explored in more detail through mapping exercises and a pilot design project. The paper uses the case studies and a workshop to draw on theory of design and models for optimising translation, with a particular focus on procurement and incremental innovation. The conclusion is a proposed methodology for optimising the inclusive design process in healthcare to produce innovations which are more likely to be adopted into front line use. The methodology involves downstream stakeholders (namely regulatory and procurement expertise) in addition to the standard front line users, building in ambition from incremental to more fundamental innovations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design for health (Abingdon, England)\",\"volume\":\"14 2 1\",\"pages\":\"252 - 269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design for health (Abingdon, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2020.1783880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2020.1783880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文借鉴了皇家艺术学院海伦·哈姆林设计中心的包容性设计和患者安全工作设计的历史,以说明临床研究人员开发和发起的产品设计面临的翻译困难。本文探讨了三个案例研究,概述了创新在商业化和实现前线应用方面所面临的共同挑战。在一个多学科研讨会上,设计师、人为因素、管理和采购人员讨论了翻译的困难。通过制图练习和试点设计项目,更详细地探讨了设计过程的概念和创新被广泛采用的过程之间的差异。本文利用案例研究和研讨会来借鉴设计理论和模型来优化翻译,特别关注采购和增量创新。结论是一种建议的方法,用于优化医疗保健中的包容性设计过程,以产生更有可能被采用到前线使用的创新。除了标准的一线用户外,该方法还涉及下游利益相关者(即监管和采购专业知识),从增量创新到更基本的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design in healthcare: the challenge of translation
Abstract This paper draws on the history of inclusive design and design for patient safety work at the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design at the Royal College of Art to illustrate translational difficulties facing product designs developed with and initiated by clinical researchers. Three case studies are explored to outline common challenges faced by innovations in the efforts to commercialise and achieve adoption into front line use. Translational difficulties were discussed in a multidisciplinary workshop with designers, human factors, regulatory and procurement personnel. The differences between the conceptions of the design process and the process by which innovations are adopted into widespread use were explored in more detail through mapping exercises and a pilot design project. The paper uses the case studies and a workshop to draw on theory of design and models for optimising translation, with a particular focus on procurement and incremental innovation. The conclusion is a proposed methodology for optimising the inclusive design process in healthcare to produce innovations which are more likely to be adopted into front line use. The methodology involves downstream stakeholders (namely regulatory and procurement expertise) in addition to the standard front line users, building in ambition from incremental to more fundamental innovations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信