莎士比亚的《亨利五世与历史密码》

IF 0.2 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
W. Caldwell
{"title":"莎士比亚的《亨利五世与历史密码》","authors":"W. Caldwell","doi":"10.1353/sel.2022.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article considers how Shakespeare’s Henry V draws upon the language of double-entry accounting to critique elitist protocols governing early modern historiographies. Rather than a merely reductive numerical procedure, double entry relied upon surprisingly literary functions—including personification—to yield a factual system lending equal legitimacy to real and fictional proper names. Beginning with an analysis of Henry V’s prologue and concluding with Henry’s tally of the dead at Agincourt, I argue that the play invokes double entry as a metaphor for theatrical representation to help underwrite its use of fictional characters and partially recoup the erasure of lower-class names from history.","PeriodicalId":45835,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900","volume":"68 1","pages":"241 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shakespeare’s Henry V and the Ciphers of History\",\"authors\":\"W. Caldwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sel.2022.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article considers how Shakespeare’s Henry V draws upon the language of double-entry accounting to critique elitist protocols governing early modern historiographies. Rather than a merely reductive numerical procedure, double entry relied upon surprisingly literary functions—including personification—to yield a factual system lending equal legitimacy to real and fictional proper names. Beginning with an analysis of Henry V’s prologue and concluding with Henry’s tally of the dead at Agincourt, I argue that the play invokes double entry as a metaphor for theatrical representation to help underwrite its use of fictional characters and partially recoup the erasure of lower-class names from history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2022.0003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2022.0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了莎士比亚的《亨利五世》如何利用复式记账法的语言来批判早期现代史学的精英主义协议。复式记帐法不仅仅是一个简化的数字程序,它依赖于令人惊讶的文学功能——包括拟人化——来产生一个事实系统,为真实和虚构的专有名称提供同等的合法性。从分析亨利五世的序言开始,以亨利在阿金库尔的死亡人数结束,我认为这部剧引用了双重记录作为戏剧表现的隐喻,以帮助其使用虚构人物,并部分地弥补历史上对下层阶级名字的抹去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shakespeare’s Henry V and the Ciphers of History
Abstract:This article considers how Shakespeare’s Henry V draws upon the language of double-entry accounting to critique elitist protocols governing early modern historiographies. Rather than a merely reductive numerical procedure, double entry relied upon surprisingly literary functions—including personification—to yield a factual system lending equal legitimacy to real and fictional proper names. Beginning with an analysis of Henry V’s prologue and concluding with Henry’s tally of the dead at Agincourt, I argue that the play invokes double entry as a metaphor for theatrical representation to help underwrite its use of fictional characters and partially recoup the erasure of lower-class names from history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900
STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: SEL focuses on four fields of British literature in rotating, quarterly issues: English Renaissance, Tudor and Stuart Drama, Restoration and Eighteenth Century, and Nineteenth Century. The editors select learned, readable papers that contribute significantly to the understanding of British literature from 1500 to 1900. SEL is well known for thecommissioned omnibus review of recent studies in the field that is included in each issue. In a single volume, readers might find an argument for attributing a previously unknown work to Shakespeare or de-attributing a famous work from Milton, a study ofthe connections between class and genre in the Restoration Theater.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信