象草青贮中未经处理或氨化的轧棉垃圾会降低青贮质量

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
D. Quadros, A. P. Andrade, Guilherme Soares de Souza, Fagner Estevam da Silva, E. O. Cavalcante
{"title":"象草青贮中未经处理或氨化的轧棉垃圾会降低青贮质量","authors":"D. Quadros, A. P. Andrade, Guilherme Soares de Souza, Fagner Estevam da Silva, E. O. Cavalcante","doi":"10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the inclusion of untreated or urea-ammoniated CGT on the chemical composition, pH, gas, and effluent losses, dry matter recovery (DMR), and aerobic stability of elephantgrass silage. The experiment was laid out in a randomized design with a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement represented by three levels of inclusion of CGT during ensiling (0, 5, or 10%) and three levels of ammoniation of CGT with urea before ensiling (0, 4 or 8% for 28 days), using four replications. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and Tukey's test, considering a 5% significance level. The pH and DM, NDIN, ADIN, NDF and ADF contents of the silages increased (p < 0.05) with the inclusion of CGT, regardless of ammoniation. The lowest (p < 0.05) effluent loss was achieved using 10% of CGT ammoniated with 8% urea. In contrast, the elephantgrass silage exhibited the lowest (p < 0.05) gas loss and the greatest (p < 0.05) DMR. The inclusion of CGT compromised the aerobic stability of the silage. Therefore, the inclusion of CGT – either untreated or ammoniated – in the ensiling of elephantgrass is not recommended.","PeriodicalId":7149,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Untreated or ammoniated cotton gin trash in the ensiling of elephant grass reduces silage quality\",\"authors\":\"D. Quadros, A. P. Andrade, Guilherme Soares de Souza, Fagner Estevam da Silva, E. O. Cavalcante\",\"doi\":\"10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the inclusion of untreated or urea-ammoniated CGT on the chemical composition, pH, gas, and effluent losses, dry matter recovery (DMR), and aerobic stability of elephantgrass silage. The experiment was laid out in a randomized design with a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement represented by three levels of inclusion of CGT during ensiling (0, 5, or 10%) and three levels of ammoniation of CGT with urea before ensiling (0, 4 or 8% for 28 days), using four replications. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and Tukey's test, considering a 5% significance level. The pH and DM, NDIN, ADIN, NDF and ADF contents of the silages increased (p < 0.05) with the inclusion of CGT, regardless of ammoniation. The lowest (p < 0.05) effluent loss was achieved using 10% of CGT ammoniated with 8% urea. In contrast, the elephantgrass silage exhibited the lowest (p < 0.05) gas loss and the greatest (p < 0.05) DMR. The inclusion of CGT compromised the aerobic stability of the silage. Therefore, the inclusion of CGT – either untreated or ammoniated – in the ensiling of elephantgrass is not recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了未经处理或尿素氨化CGT对象草青贮的化学成分、pH值、气体和废水损失、干物质回收率(DMR)和有氧稳定性的影响。试验采用3 × 3因子随机设计,分别在青贮期间添加3个水平的CGT(0、5、10%),在青贮前用尿素氨化3个水平的CGT(0、4、8%,28 d),共4个重复。数据进行方差分析和Tukey检验,考虑5%显著性水平。无论氨化程度如何,添加CGT后青贮饲料的pH、DM、NDIN、ADIN、NDF和ADF含量均显著升高(p < 0.05)。10% CGT加8%尿素氨化处理出水损失最小(p < 0.05)。相比之下,象草青贮的气体损失最低(p < 0.05), DMR最高(p < 0.05)。CGT的加入损害了青贮饲料的有氧稳定性。因此,不建议在象草青贮中加入CGT——无论是未经处理的还是氨化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Untreated or ammoniated cotton gin trash in the ensiling of elephant grass reduces silage quality
This study examined the inclusion of untreated or urea-ammoniated CGT on the chemical composition, pH, gas, and effluent losses, dry matter recovery (DMR), and aerobic stability of elephantgrass silage. The experiment was laid out in a randomized design with a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement represented by three levels of inclusion of CGT during ensiling (0, 5, or 10%) and three levels of ammoniation of CGT with urea before ensiling (0, 4 or 8% for 28 days), using four replications. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and Tukey's test, considering a 5% significance level. The pH and DM, NDIN, ADIN, NDF and ADF contents of the silages increased (p < 0.05) with the inclusion of CGT, regardless of ammoniation. The lowest (p < 0.05) effluent loss was achieved using 10% of CGT ammoniated with 8% urea. In contrast, the elephantgrass silage exhibited the lowest (p < 0.05) gas loss and the greatest (p < 0.05) DMR. The inclusion of CGT compromised the aerobic stability of the silage. Therefore, the inclusion of CGT – either untreated or ammoniated – in the ensiling of elephantgrass is not recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信