有形资产和无形资产的比较

I. Wallis
{"title":"有形资产和无形资产的比较","authors":"I. Wallis","doi":"10.1061/JEEGAV.0000787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three techniques are described for comparing the tangible and intangible costs and benefits involved in environmental and water resources projects. The three techniques are: (1)Engineering judgment; (2)cost-benefit analysis; and (3)preference analysis. A game used in interviews to establish preferences is described and the interpretation of the results of the game is covered. Development and cautious use of preference analysis as part of the evaluation of tangible and intangible costs and benefits is recommended.","PeriodicalId":17335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division","volume":"1 1","pages":"625-637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Tangibles and Intangibles\",\"authors\":\"I. Wallis\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/JEEGAV.0000787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three techniques are described for comparing the tangible and intangible costs and benefits involved in environmental and water resources projects. The three techniques are: (1)Engineering judgment; (2)cost-benefit analysis; and (3)preference analysis. A game used in interviews to establish preferences is described and the interpretation of the results of the game is covered. Development and cautious use of preference analysis as part of the evaluation of tangible and intangible costs and benefits is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"625-637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/JEEGAV.0000787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/JEEGAV.0000787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

描述了三种技术,用于比较环境和水资源项目中涉及的有形和无形成本和收益。这三种技术是:(1)工程判断;(2)成本效益分析;(3)偏好分析。本文描述了一个在访谈中用来建立偏好的游戏,并涵盖了对游戏结果的解释。建议发展和谨慎使用偏好分析,作为评价有形和无形成本和收益的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Tangibles and Intangibles
Three techniques are described for comparing the tangible and intangible costs and benefits involved in environmental and water resources projects. The three techniques are: (1)Engineering judgment; (2)cost-benefit analysis; and (3)preference analysis. A game used in interviews to establish preferences is described and the interpretation of the results of the game is covered. Development and cautious use of preference analysis as part of the evaluation of tangible and intangible costs and benefits is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信