技术创新中的制度干预:提高移动支付采用率的斗争

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Sandip Mukhopadhyay, Parijat Upadhyay
{"title":"技术创新中的制度干预:提高移动支付采用率的斗争","authors":"Sandip Mukhopadhyay, Parijat Upadhyay","doi":"10.1108/dprg-01-2021-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nPlatform-driven business models have witnessed a significant proliferation in emerging economies. Such initiatives bring cost-effective services to a larger section of the population, given the reach of mobile phones. Drawing insights from the institutional theory and theories on the multisided platform, this paper aims to examine the impact of institutional intervention and platform competition on the initial adoption and continuance intention of platform-based payment services.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research model is empirically developed through a unique single-case study covering the high-value banknote demonetization in India that was initiated in November 2016. The research is primarily based on archival data and is supported by a limited number of interviews.\n\n\nFindings\nThe research finds that institutional interventions (in multiple forms) have increased people’s eagerness to use mobile payment. Supportive institutional environment and common citizen’s increased eagerness for mobile payment usage resulted in the emergence of multiple mobile payment platforms. Moreover, competition among multiple payment platforms positively impacts the continuance intention of users to use mobile payments.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe research supplements the present understanding of the technology adoption challenges. The study highlights that the relative success of technology adoption cannot be attributed only to the users’ economic or technological motives, as embodied in the adoption models. Carefully designed interventions by the institutions can reduce users’ inertia in using new technology and positively influence the emergence of multiple platform-based service providers.\n","PeriodicalId":56357,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional intervention in technology innovation: the struggle to increase mobile payment adoption\",\"authors\":\"Sandip Mukhopadhyay, Parijat Upadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dprg-01-2021-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nPlatform-driven business models have witnessed a significant proliferation in emerging economies. Such initiatives bring cost-effective services to a larger section of the population, given the reach of mobile phones. Drawing insights from the institutional theory and theories on the multisided platform, this paper aims to examine the impact of institutional intervention and platform competition on the initial adoption and continuance intention of platform-based payment services.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe research model is empirically developed through a unique single-case study covering the high-value banknote demonetization in India that was initiated in November 2016. The research is primarily based on archival data and is supported by a limited number of interviews.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe research finds that institutional interventions (in multiple forms) have increased people’s eagerness to use mobile payment. Supportive institutional environment and common citizen’s increased eagerness for mobile payment usage resulted in the emergence of multiple mobile payment platforms. Moreover, competition among multiple payment platforms positively impacts the continuance intention of users to use mobile payments.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe research supplements the present understanding of the technology adoption challenges. The study highlights that the relative success of technology adoption cannot be attributed only to the users’ economic or technological motives, as embodied in the adoption models. Carefully designed interventions by the institutions can reduce users’ inertia in using new technology and positively influence the emergence of multiple platform-based service providers.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":56357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-01-2021-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-01-2021-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的:平台驱动的商业模式在新兴经济体中得到了广泛应用。鉴于移动电话的普及,这些举措为更大一部分人口带来了具有成本效益的服务。本文旨在借鉴制度理论和多边平台理论,考察制度干预和平台竞争对平台支付服务初始采用和延续意愿的影响。设计/方法/方法该研究模型是通过对2016年11月开始的印度大额钞票非货币化的独特单案例研究进行实证开发的。该研究主要基于档案数据,并得到有限数量访谈的支持。研究发现,制度干预(以多种形式)增加了人们使用移动支付的热情。有利的制度环境和普通公民对移动支付使用热情的提高,导致了多个移动支付平台的出现。此外,多个支付平台之间的竞争对用户继续使用移动支付的意愿产生了积极的影响。原创性/价值本研究补充了目前对技术采用挑战的理解。研究强调,技术采用的相对成功不能仅仅归因于用户的经济或技术动机,正如采用模型所体现的那样。机构精心设计的干预措施可以减少用户使用新技术的惯性,并对多种基于平台的服务提供商的出现产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional intervention in technology innovation: the struggle to increase mobile payment adoption
Purpose Platform-driven business models have witnessed a significant proliferation in emerging economies. Such initiatives bring cost-effective services to a larger section of the population, given the reach of mobile phones. Drawing insights from the institutional theory and theories on the multisided platform, this paper aims to examine the impact of institutional intervention and platform competition on the initial adoption and continuance intention of platform-based payment services. Design/methodology/approach The research model is empirically developed through a unique single-case study covering the high-value banknote demonetization in India that was initiated in November 2016. The research is primarily based on archival data and is supported by a limited number of interviews. Findings The research finds that institutional interventions (in multiple forms) have increased people’s eagerness to use mobile payment. Supportive institutional environment and common citizen’s increased eagerness for mobile payment usage resulted in the emergence of multiple mobile payment platforms. Moreover, competition among multiple payment platforms positively impacts the continuance intention of users to use mobile payments. Originality/value The research supplements the present understanding of the technology adoption challenges. The study highlights that the relative success of technology adoption cannot be attributed only to the users’ economic or technological motives, as embodied in the adoption models. Carefully designed interventions by the institutions can reduce users’ inertia in using new technology and positively influence the emergence of multiple platform-based service providers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Emerald holds journals from the current and previous year. We hold all older back volumes and can supply high quality reprints for most volumes that were previously out-of-print. Complete list of titles we can supply from this publisher Publisher''s web page and subscription information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信