{"title":"流离失所:约翰·伯杰的《国王》和因陀罗·辛哈的《动物的人民》中的框架(和)废墟","authors":"Kylie Crane","doi":"10.16995/OLH.633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay brings John Berger’s King (1999) together with Indra Sinha’s Animal’s People (2007) to think through displacements with/in ruins. I interpret the settings of the novels, consider the narrative voices used to articulate the stories, and contemplate the contexts provided by various paratextual devices, in order to address this primary concern. The lives depicted in King and Animal’s People are precarious, disenfranchised, exposed to (toxic) waste. They are structured by, through, and with, ruin.","PeriodicalId":23663,"journal":{"name":"Volume!","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Displacements: Framing (and) Ruins in John Berger’s King and Indra Sinha’s Animal’s People\",\"authors\":\"Kylie Crane\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/OLH.633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay brings John Berger’s King (1999) together with Indra Sinha’s Animal’s People (2007) to think through displacements with/in ruins. I interpret the settings of the novels, consider the narrative voices used to articulate the stories, and contemplate the contexts provided by various paratextual devices, in order to address this primary concern. The lives depicted in King and Animal’s People are precarious, disenfranchised, exposed to (toxic) waste. They are structured by, through, and with, ruin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume!\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume!\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/OLH.633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume!","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/OLH.633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Displacements: Framing (and) Ruins in John Berger’s King and Indra Sinha’s Animal’s People
This essay brings John Berger’s King (1999) together with Indra Sinha’s Animal’s People (2007) to think through displacements with/in ruins. I interpret the settings of the novels, consider the narrative voices used to articulate the stories, and contemplate the contexts provided by various paratextual devices, in order to address this primary concern. The lives depicted in King and Animal’s People are precarious, disenfranchised, exposed to (toxic) waste. They are structured by, through, and with, ruin.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
