Arie Carneiro, Willy Baccaglini, Felipe P A Glina, Paulo P Kayano, Victor M Nunes, Oren Smaletz, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Icaro Thiago de Carvalho, Gustavo Caserta Lemos
{"title":"局部治疗对转移性前列腺癌患者总生存期的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Arie Carneiro, Willy Baccaglini, Felipe P A Glina, Paulo P Kayano, Victor M Nunes, Oren Smaletz, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Icaro Thiago de Carvalho, Gustavo Caserta Lemos","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Currently, standard treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer (MPCa) is androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Recent studies suggested that local treatment of MPCa is related to increase of survival of those patients, as observed in other tumors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of local treatment on overall survival and cancer specific survival in 3 and 5 years in patients with MPCa.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies published at PubMed, Scielo, Lilacs, Cochrane and EMBASE databases until June 2016. Several large cohorts and Post-Roc studies were included, that evaluated patients with MPCa submitted to local treatment (LT) using radiotherapy (RDT), surgery (RP) or brachytherapy (BCT) or not submitted to local treatment (NLT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34.338 patients were analyzed in six included papers, 31.653 submitted to NLT and 2.685 to LT. Overall survival in three years was significantly higher in patients submitted to LT versus NLT (64.2% vs. 44.5%; RD 0.19, 95% CI, 0.17-0.21; p<0.00001; I²=0%), as well as in five years (51.9% vs. 23.6%; RD 0.30, 95% CI, 0.11-0.49; p<0.00001; I²=97%). Sensitive analysis according to type of local treatment showed that surgery (78.2% and 45.0%; RD 0.31, 95% CI, 0.26-0.35; p<0.00001; I²=50%) and radiotherapy (60.4% and 44.5%; RD 0.17, 95% CI, 0.12-0.22; p<0.00001; I²=67%) presented better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LT using RDT, RP or BCT seems to significantly improve overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with metastatic prostatic cancer. Prospective and randomized studies must be performed in order to confirm our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":13674,"journal":{"name":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"588-599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5557433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Arie Carneiro, Willy Baccaglini, Felipe P A Glina, Paulo P Kayano, Victor M Nunes, Oren Smaletz, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Icaro Thiago de Carvalho, Gustavo Caserta Lemos\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Currently, standard treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer (MPCa) is androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Recent studies suggested that local treatment of MPCa is related to increase of survival of those patients, as observed in other tumors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of local treatment on overall survival and cancer specific survival in 3 and 5 years in patients with MPCa.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies published at PubMed, Scielo, Lilacs, Cochrane and EMBASE databases until June 2016. Several large cohorts and Post-Roc studies were included, that evaluated patients with MPCa submitted to local treatment (LT) using radiotherapy (RDT), surgery (RP) or brachytherapy (BCT) or not submitted to local treatment (NLT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34.338 patients were analyzed in six included papers, 31.653 submitted to NLT and 2.685 to LT. Overall survival in three years was significantly higher in patients submitted to LT versus NLT (64.2% vs. 44.5%; RD 0.19, 95% CI, 0.17-0.21; p<0.00001; I²=0%), as well as in five years (51.9% vs. 23.6%; RD 0.30, 95% CI, 0.11-0.49; p<0.00001; I²=97%). Sensitive analysis according to type of local treatment showed that surgery (78.2% and 45.0%; RD 0.31, 95% CI, 0.26-0.35; p<0.00001; I²=50%) and radiotherapy (60.4% and 44.5%; RD 0.17, 95% CI, 0.12-0.22; p<0.00001; I²=67%) presented better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LT using RDT, RP or BCT seems to significantly improve overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with metastatic prostatic cancer. Prospective and randomized studies must be performed in order to confirm our results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"588-599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5557433/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前,转移性前列腺癌(MPCa)的标准治疗是雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)。最近的研究表明,局部治疗MPCa与其他肿瘤患者的生存率增加有关。目的:评价局部治疗对MPCa患者3年和5年总生存期和肿瘤特异性生存期的影响。材料和方法:对截至2016年6月在PubMed、Scielo、Lilacs、Cochrane和EMBASE数据库发表的人口研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。纳入了几个大型队列和后roc研究,评估了MPCa患者接受局部治疗(LT),包括放疗(RDT)、手术(RP)或近距离治疗(BCT)或不接受局部治疗(NLT)。结果:6篇纳入的论文分析了34.338例患者,其中31.653例接受了NLT治疗,2.685例接受了LT治疗。接受LT治疗的患者3年总生存率显著高于接受NLT治疗的患者(64.2% vs. 44.5%;Rd 0.19, 95% ci 0.17-0.21;结论:采用RDT、RP或BCT的肝移植似乎可以显著提高转移性前列腺癌患者的总生存率和肿瘤特异性生存率。为了证实我们的结果,必须进行前瞻性和随机研究。
Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Context: Currently, standard treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer (MPCa) is androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Recent studies suggested that local treatment of MPCa is related to increase of survival of those patients, as observed in other tumors.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of local treatment on overall survival and cancer specific survival in 3 and 5 years in patients with MPCa.
Materials and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies published at PubMed, Scielo, Lilacs, Cochrane and EMBASE databases until June 2016. Several large cohorts and Post-Roc studies were included, that evaluated patients with MPCa submitted to local treatment (LT) using radiotherapy (RDT), surgery (RP) or brachytherapy (BCT) or not submitted to local treatment (NLT).
Results: 34.338 patients were analyzed in six included papers, 31.653 submitted to NLT and 2.685 to LT. Overall survival in three years was significantly higher in patients submitted to LT versus NLT (64.2% vs. 44.5%; RD 0.19, 95% CI, 0.17-0.21; p<0.00001; I²=0%), as well as in five years (51.9% vs. 23.6%; RD 0.30, 95% CI, 0.11-0.49; p<0.00001; I²=97%). Sensitive analysis according to type of local treatment showed that surgery (78.2% and 45.0%; RD 0.31, 95% CI, 0.26-0.35; p<0.00001; I²=50%) and radiotherapy (60.4% and 44.5%; RD 0.17, 95% CI, 0.12-0.22; p<0.00001; I²=67%) presented better outcomes.
Conclusion: LT using RDT, RP or BCT seems to significantly improve overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with metastatic prostatic cancer. Prospective and randomized studies must be performed in order to confirm our results.