基于Wireshark的4G LTE网络视频会议工具QoS对比研究

Sirmayanti Sirmayanti, Asriani Tain, Nurul Khaerani Hamzidah
{"title":"基于Wireshark的4G LTE网络视频会议工具QoS对比研究","authors":"Sirmayanti Sirmayanti, Asriani Tain, Nurul Khaerani Hamzidah","doi":"10.32520/stmsi.v12i1.2069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Video meeting is a broadband internet-based service for long-distance communication, both visual and audio, in one room or in different rooms at the same time. Network testing using wireshark software connects to the Telkomsel operator's 4G LTE network. QoS parameters can display network quality such as throughput, packet loss, delay and jitter. The research experiment test used two conditions with different variables in the five types of video meeting tools being compared; zoho meeting, cisco webex meeting, google meet, zoom meeting and microsoft teams. First-condition uses random variables that do not consider the value of the number of participants and camera & microphone conditions to each client. Second-condition uses a fixed variable that the number of each client is 5 participants for each application (camera & microphone is on). The first-condition results showed that only Zoom Meeting which had a QoS value classified as Poor (index 1), especially the jitter value, compared to other applications. This application has an average jitter of 151,871 ms, that compared to TIPHON standard of 125 ms to 255 ms. The second-condition obtained Very Good QoS on throughput, packet loss and delay variables in all applications. Their variable jitter in each application is Zoho Meeting (0.101 ms), Cisco Webex meeting (0.074 ms), Google Meet (0.179 ms), Zoom meeting (0.021 ms), and Microsoft Teams (0.015 ms) which only in the standard 0 ms to/ d 75 ms. However, all applications according to the TIPHON standards are still in the Good category (index 3). The overall index average of all applications shows Good QoS.Keywords: video meeting,  wireshark, quality of service, 4G LTE.","PeriodicalId":32367,"journal":{"name":"Sistemasi Jurnal Sistem Informasi","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of QoS on Video Meeting Tool Application in 4G LTE Network using Wireshark\",\"authors\":\"Sirmayanti Sirmayanti, Asriani Tain, Nurul Khaerani Hamzidah\",\"doi\":\"10.32520/stmsi.v12i1.2069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Video meeting is a broadband internet-based service for long-distance communication, both visual and audio, in one room or in different rooms at the same time. Network testing using wireshark software connects to the Telkomsel operator's 4G LTE network. QoS parameters can display network quality such as throughput, packet loss, delay and jitter. The research experiment test used two conditions with different variables in the five types of video meeting tools being compared; zoho meeting, cisco webex meeting, google meet, zoom meeting and microsoft teams. First-condition uses random variables that do not consider the value of the number of participants and camera & microphone conditions to each client. Second-condition uses a fixed variable that the number of each client is 5 participants for each application (camera & microphone is on). The first-condition results showed that only Zoom Meeting which had a QoS value classified as Poor (index 1), especially the jitter value, compared to other applications. This application has an average jitter of 151,871 ms, that compared to TIPHON standard of 125 ms to 255 ms. The second-condition obtained Very Good QoS on throughput, packet loss and delay variables in all applications. Their variable jitter in each application is Zoho Meeting (0.101 ms), Cisco Webex meeting (0.074 ms), Google Meet (0.179 ms), Zoom meeting (0.021 ms), and Microsoft Teams (0.015 ms) which only in the standard 0 ms to/ d 75 ms. However, all applications according to the TIPHON standards are still in the Good category (index 3). The overall index average of all applications shows Good QoS.Keywords: video meeting,  wireshark, quality of service, 4G LTE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sistemasi Jurnal Sistem Informasi\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sistemasi Jurnal Sistem Informasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v12i1.2069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sistemasi Jurnal Sistem Informasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v12i1.2069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

视频会议是一种基于宽带互联网的远程视频和音频通信服务,可以在一个房间或不同的房间同时进行。使用wireshark软件进行网络测试,连接到Telkomsel运营商的4G LTE网络。QoS参数可以显示吞吐量、丢包、延迟和抖动等网络质量。本研究采用实验测试两种条件下具有不同变量的五种视频会议工具进行比较;Zoho会议,cisco webex会议,b谷歌会议,zoom会议和微软团队。第一条件使用随机变量,不考虑每个客户端的参与者数量和相机和麦克风条件的值。第二个条件使用一个固定的变量,即每个应用程序的每个客户端数量为5个参与者(相机和麦克风打开)。第一条件的结果表明,相比于其他应用,只有Zoom Meeting的QoS值被分类为差(指数1),特别是抖动值。该应用程序的平均抖动为151,871 ms,而TIPHON标准为125 ms至255 ms。第二种条件在所有应用的吞吐量、丢包量和时延变量上都获得了很好的QoS。他们在每个应用程序中的可变抖动是Zoho会议(0.101 ms), Cisco Webex会议(0.074 ms),谷歌会议(0.179 ms), Zoom会议(0.021 ms)和Microsoft Teams (0.015 ms),仅在标准的0 ms到75 ms之间。但是,根据TIPHON标准,所有应用程序仍然处于良好类别(指数3)。所有应用程序的总体指数平均值显示为良好的QoS。关键词:视频会议,wireshark,服务质量,4G LTE
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of QoS on Video Meeting Tool Application in 4G LTE Network using Wireshark
Video meeting is a broadband internet-based service for long-distance communication, both visual and audio, in one room or in different rooms at the same time. Network testing using wireshark software connects to the Telkomsel operator's 4G LTE network. QoS parameters can display network quality such as throughput, packet loss, delay and jitter. The research experiment test used two conditions with different variables in the five types of video meeting tools being compared; zoho meeting, cisco webex meeting, google meet, zoom meeting and microsoft teams. First-condition uses random variables that do not consider the value of the number of participants and camera & microphone conditions to each client. Second-condition uses a fixed variable that the number of each client is 5 participants for each application (camera & microphone is on). The first-condition results showed that only Zoom Meeting which had a QoS value classified as Poor (index 1), especially the jitter value, compared to other applications. This application has an average jitter of 151,871 ms, that compared to TIPHON standard of 125 ms to 255 ms. The second-condition obtained Very Good QoS on throughput, packet loss and delay variables in all applications. Their variable jitter in each application is Zoho Meeting (0.101 ms), Cisco Webex meeting (0.074 ms), Google Meet (0.179 ms), Zoom meeting (0.021 ms), and Microsoft Teams (0.015 ms) which only in the standard 0 ms to/ d 75 ms. However, all applications according to the TIPHON standards are still in the Good category (index 3). The overall index average of all applications shows Good QoS.Keywords: video meeting,  wireshark, quality of service, 4G LTE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
43 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信