药剂学学生的计算机辅助考试复习

Arthur Pappas, B. Cesnik, Len Sorgetti
{"title":"药剂学学生的计算机辅助考试复习","authors":"Arthur Pappas, B. Cesnik, Len Sorgetti","doi":"10.1002/JPPR199929110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Various versions of a computer program were developed and evaluated between 1994 and 1997 to assist first year students independently revise for a final examination. With the ongoing upgrade of hardware at the Victorian College of Pharmacy over this period, the software was piloted on stand-alone machines followed by extensive use in a networked environment (N) and finally on disk (D) to enable home use. Study Procedure: Improved versions of the software were implemented over the four years. Each group of students that was exposed to the software was surveyed by questionnaire between one to two months after release. Data on program use was collected for both 1995 and 1996 networked versions. Results: Students were asked to rate various aspects of the program. High or very high ratings were given for the objectives of each version: N[1995] (68-92%); N[1996] (66- 94%) and D (79-98%). The programs were rated better or much better than paper-based exams: N[1995] (69-91%); N[1996] (77-90%) and D (58- 93%). The number of program features were increased with each new version and most students rated them as useful or very useful. Conclusions: Overall, students responded very positively to this program as a mode of independent revision. The limitation of the campus computer access (15 computers to serve all students) was greatly reduced when the program was available on floppy disk. We believe that the wide range of program features increased the value and attraction of this mode for self-testing. (author abstract)","PeriodicalId":22283,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"39 1","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer-assisted exam revision by pharmacy students\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Pappas, B. Cesnik, Len Sorgetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/JPPR199929110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Various versions of a computer program were developed and evaluated between 1994 and 1997 to assist first year students independently revise for a final examination. With the ongoing upgrade of hardware at the Victorian College of Pharmacy over this period, the software was piloted on stand-alone machines followed by extensive use in a networked environment (N) and finally on disk (D) to enable home use. Study Procedure: Improved versions of the software were implemented over the four years. Each group of students that was exposed to the software was surveyed by questionnaire between one to two months after release. Data on program use was collected for both 1995 and 1996 networked versions. Results: Students were asked to rate various aspects of the program. High or very high ratings were given for the objectives of each version: N[1995] (68-92%); N[1996] (66- 94%) and D (79-98%). The programs were rated better or much better than paper-based exams: N[1995] (69-91%); N[1996] (77-90%) and D (58- 93%). The number of program features were increased with each new version and most students rated them as useful or very useful. Conclusions: Overall, students responded very positively to this program as a mode of independent revision. The limitation of the campus computer access (15 computers to serve all students) was greatly reduced when the program was available on floppy disk. We believe that the wide range of program features increased the value and attraction of this mode for self-testing. (author abstract)\",\"PeriodicalId\":22283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"10-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/JPPR199929110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/JPPR199929110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:1994年至1997年间开发并评估了不同版本的计算机程序,以帮助一年级学生独立修改期末考试。在此期间,随着维多利亚药学院硬件的不断升级,软件首先在独立机器上试用,然后在网络环境(N)中广泛使用,最后在磁盘(D)上使用,使家庭使用成为可能。研究过程:在四年的时间里实施了软件的改进版本。在软件发布后的一到两个月内,每组接触到软件的学生都接受了问卷调查。收集了1995年和1996年联网版本的程序使用数据。结果:学生们被要求对项目的各个方面打分。对每个版本的目标给出了高或非常高的评分:N[1995] (68-92%);N[1996](66- 94%)和D(79-98%)。这些课程被评为比纸质考试更好或好得多:N[1995] (69-91%);N[1996](77-90%)和D(58- 93%)。每个新版本的程序功能数量都有所增加,大多数学生认为它们有用或非常有用。结论:总的来说,学生们对这个项目作为一种自主复习模式的反应非常积极。当程序可以在软盘上使用时,校园计算机访问的限制(15台计算机为所有学生服务)大大减少了。我们相信,广泛的程序功能增加了这种自测模式的价值和吸引力。(作者抽象)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computer-assisted exam revision by pharmacy students
Objectives: Various versions of a computer program were developed and evaluated between 1994 and 1997 to assist first year students independently revise for a final examination. With the ongoing upgrade of hardware at the Victorian College of Pharmacy over this period, the software was piloted on stand-alone machines followed by extensive use in a networked environment (N) and finally on disk (D) to enable home use. Study Procedure: Improved versions of the software were implemented over the four years. Each group of students that was exposed to the software was surveyed by questionnaire between one to two months after release. Data on program use was collected for both 1995 and 1996 networked versions. Results: Students were asked to rate various aspects of the program. High or very high ratings were given for the objectives of each version: N[1995] (68-92%); N[1996] (66- 94%) and D (79-98%). The programs were rated better or much better than paper-based exams: N[1995] (69-91%); N[1996] (77-90%) and D (58- 93%). The number of program features were increased with each new version and most students rated them as useful or very useful. Conclusions: Overall, students responded very positively to this program as a mode of independent revision. The limitation of the campus computer access (15 computers to serve all students) was greatly reduced when the program was available on floppy disk. We believe that the wide range of program features increased the value and attraction of this mode for self-testing. (author abstract)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信