Polygon consensus:从历史地图中提取建筑足迹的智能众包

B. Budig, Thomas C. van Dijk, F. Feitsch, M. Arteaga
{"title":"Polygon consensus:从历史地图中提取建筑足迹的智能众包","authors":"B. Budig, Thomas C. van Dijk, F. Feitsch, M. Arteaga","doi":"10.1145/2996913.2996951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the course of three years, the New York Public Library has run a crowdsourcing project to extract polygonal representation of the building footprints from insurance atlases of the 19th and early-20th century. As is common in crowd-sourcing projects, the overall problem was decomposed into small user tasks and each task was given to multiple users. In the case of polygons representing building footprints, it is unclear how best to integrate the answers into a majority vote: given a set of polygons ostensibly describing the same footprint, what is the consensus? We discuss desirable properties of such a \"consensus polygon\" and arrive at an efficient algorithm. We have manually evaluated the algorithm on approximately 3,000 polygons corresponding to 200 footprints and observe that our algorithmic consensus polygons are correct for 96% of the footprints whereas only 85% of the (input) crowd polygons are correct.","PeriodicalId":20525,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polygon consensus: smart crowdsourcing for extracting building footprints from historical maps\",\"authors\":\"B. Budig, Thomas C. van Dijk, F. Feitsch, M. Arteaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2996913.2996951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the course of three years, the New York Public Library has run a crowdsourcing project to extract polygonal representation of the building footprints from insurance atlases of the 19th and early-20th century. As is common in crowd-sourcing projects, the overall problem was decomposed into small user tasks and each task was given to multiple users. In the case of polygons representing building footprints, it is unclear how best to integrate the answers into a majority vote: given a set of polygons ostensibly describing the same footprint, what is the consensus? We discuss desirable properties of such a \\\"consensus polygon\\\" and arrive at an efficient algorithm. We have manually evaluated the algorithm on approximately 3,000 polygons corresponding to 200 footprints and observe that our algorithmic consensus polygons are correct for 96% of the footprints whereas only 85% of the (input) crowd polygons are correct.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2996913.2996951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2996913.2996951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在三年的时间里,纽约公共图书馆开展了一个众包项目,从19世纪和20世纪初的保险地图集中提取建筑足迹的多边形表示。正如众包项目中常见的那样,将整个问题分解为小的用户任务,每个任务分配给多个用户。在多边形代表建筑足迹的情况下,目前尚不清楚如何最好地将答案整合到多数投票中:给定一组表面上描述相同足迹的多边形,共识是什么?我们讨论了这种“一致多边形”的理想性质,并得出了一种有效的算法。我们手动评估了大约3000个多边形对应200个足迹的算法,并观察到我们的算法共识多边形对96%的足迹是正确的,而只有85%的(输入)人群多边形是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polygon consensus: smart crowdsourcing for extracting building footprints from historical maps
Over the course of three years, the New York Public Library has run a crowdsourcing project to extract polygonal representation of the building footprints from insurance atlases of the 19th and early-20th century. As is common in crowd-sourcing projects, the overall problem was decomposed into small user tasks and each task was given to multiple users. In the case of polygons representing building footprints, it is unclear how best to integrate the answers into a majority vote: given a set of polygons ostensibly describing the same footprint, what is the consensus? We discuss desirable properties of such a "consensus polygon" and arrive at an efficient algorithm. We have manually evaluated the algorithm on approximately 3,000 polygons corresponding to 200 footprints and observe that our algorithmic consensus polygons are correct for 96% of the footprints whereas only 85% of the (input) crowd polygons are correct.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信