PPPS-2013:电场传感器对脉冲功率测量的影响

F. Santamaria, F. Roman
{"title":"PPPS-2013:电场传感器对脉冲功率测量的影响","authors":"F. Santamaria, F. Roman","doi":"10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6633422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. A coaxial pulse generator was designed and constructed for an experimental study on a sub-millimeter spark-gap, where the characteristic impedance of the Pulse Forming Line (PFL) and the Transmission Line (TL) is Zc = 100Ω the spark-gap is located into a pressurized chamber between PFL and TL, and the transmission line generator ends at a 100Ω resistance (LOAD).resistance (LOAD). D-dot sensors, used to register the waveforms in both the PFL and TL, are not located exactly on the spark-gap; instead, they are laid 40 mm from the pressurized chamber along both the PFL and TL. To determine the effect of sensor position on voltage measurements, simulations using the EMTP-ATP program were carried out. The PFL voltage (V1) and TL voltage (V2) recorded in different places along the lines are analyzed by using distributed parameter models of the corresponding coaxial transmission lines and also including the electric-arc nonlinear model in the spark-gap switch. Additionally, the distributed parameter circuit models representing the effect of the dielectric materials were included. A MODEL of the spark-gap channel resistance was included. In the MODEL, both the resistive phase and the inductive phase of the gas discharge channel proposedby Martin1 were implemented. The difference between the signal recorded just after the spark-gap (V2) and the one recorded some tens of millimeters forward (V2') is the time delay due to the displacement of the measurement point. Additionally, when comparing the voltage signal recorded just before the spark-gap (V1) with the signal recorded some tens of millimeters backward (V1'), two differences can be observed. The former is the delay in the onset of the two signals. The second difference is a variation in the waveform of the signals. A hypothesis was formulated claiming that this is because the sensor does not record all the charge moving along the transmission line. To confirm this hypothesis, both the charge stored up to the D-dot sensor location and also the charge stored up until the spark-gap were calculated on the basis of EMTP-ATP simulations. The difference between these charges (21.63 nC) was compared with the charge stored in the segment of the transmission line (21.99 nC). The results of these calculations show a difference of 1.6 %, thus the hypothesis was validated.","PeriodicalId":6313,"journal":{"name":"2013 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)","volume":"51 1","pages":"1-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PPPS-2013: Electric field sensors effect on pulsed power measurements\",\"authors\":\"F. Santamaria, F. Roman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6633422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary form only given. A coaxial pulse generator was designed and constructed for an experimental study on a sub-millimeter spark-gap, where the characteristic impedance of the Pulse Forming Line (PFL) and the Transmission Line (TL) is Zc = 100Ω the spark-gap is located into a pressurized chamber between PFL and TL, and the transmission line generator ends at a 100Ω resistance (LOAD).resistance (LOAD). D-dot sensors, used to register the waveforms in both the PFL and TL, are not located exactly on the spark-gap; instead, they are laid 40 mm from the pressurized chamber along both the PFL and TL. To determine the effect of sensor position on voltage measurements, simulations using the EMTP-ATP program were carried out. The PFL voltage (V1) and TL voltage (V2) recorded in different places along the lines are analyzed by using distributed parameter models of the corresponding coaxial transmission lines and also including the electric-arc nonlinear model in the spark-gap switch. Additionally, the distributed parameter circuit models representing the effect of the dielectric materials were included. A MODEL of the spark-gap channel resistance was included. In the MODEL, both the resistive phase and the inductive phase of the gas discharge channel proposedby Martin1 were implemented. The difference between the signal recorded just after the spark-gap (V2) and the one recorded some tens of millimeters forward (V2') is the time delay due to the displacement of the measurement point. Additionally, when comparing the voltage signal recorded just before the spark-gap (V1) with the signal recorded some tens of millimeters backward (V1'), two differences can be observed. The former is the delay in the onset of the two signals. The second difference is a variation in the waveform of the signals. A hypothesis was formulated claiming that this is because the sensor does not record all the charge moving along the transmission line. To confirm this hypothesis, both the charge stored up to the D-dot sensor location and also the charge stored up until the spark-gap were calculated on the basis of EMTP-ATP simulations. The difference between these charges (21.63 nC) was compared with the charge stored in the segment of the transmission line (21.99 nC). The results of these calculations show a difference of 1.6 %, thus the hypothesis was validated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"1-1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6633422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6633422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

只提供摘要形式。设计并构建了一个同轴脉冲发生器,用于亚毫米级火花隙的实验研究,其中脉冲形成线(PFL)和传输线(TL)的特性阻抗为Zc = 100Ω,火花隙位于PFL和TL之间的增压腔内,传输线发生器的端部电阻为100Ω (LOAD)。电阻(负载)。用于记录PFL和TL波形的d点传感器并不精确地位于火花间隙上;相反,它们沿着PFL和TL放置在距离加压室40毫米的地方。为了确定传感器位置对电压测量的影响,使用EMTP-ATP程序进行了模拟。采用相应同轴传输线的分布参数模型,并包括火花隙开关中的电弧非线性模型,对沿线路不同位置记录的PFL电压V1和TL电压V2进行了分析。此外,还包括表征介电材料影响的分布参数电路模型。建立了电火花隙通道电阻模型。在模型中,同时实现了Martin1提出的气体放电通道的电阻相和感应相。恰好在火花间隙(V2)之后记录的信号与向前几十毫米(V2’)记录的信号之间的差异是由于测量点的位移引起的时间延迟。此外,当将恰好在火花间隙(V1)之前记录的电压信号与向后几十毫米(V1’)记录的信号进行比较时,可以观察到两个差异。前者是两个信号开始时的延迟。第二个区别是信号波形的变化。提出了一个假设,声称这是因为传感器没有记录沿着传输线移动的所有电荷。为了证实这一假设,在EMTP-ATP模拟的基础上,计算了存储到d点传感器位置的电荷和存储到火花间隙的电荷。将这些电荷(21.63 nC)与存储在传输线段中的电荷(21.99 nC)进行比较。这些计算结果显示了1.6%的差异,因此假设是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PPPS-2013: Electric field sensors effect on pulsed power measurements
Summary form only given. A coaxial pulse generator was designed and constructed for an experimental study on a sub-millimeter spark-gap, where the characteristic impedance of the Pulse Forming Line (PFL) and the Transmission Line (TL) is Zc = 100Ω the spark-gap is located into a pressurized chamber between PFL and TL, and the transmission line generator ends at a 100Ω resistance (LOAD).resistance (LOAD). D-dot sensors, used to register the waveforms in both the PFL and TL, are not located exactly on the spark-gap; instead, they are laid 40 mm from the pressurized chamber along both the PFL and TL. To determine the effect of sensor position on voltage measurements, simulations using the EMTP-ATP program were carried out. The PFL voltage (V1) and TL voltage (V2) recorded in different places along the lines are analyzed by using distributed parameter models of the corresponding coaxial transmission lines and also including the electric-arc nonlinear model in the spark-gap switch. Additionally, the distributed parameter circuit models representing the effect of the dielectric materials were included. A MODEL of the spark-gap channel resistance was included. In the MODEL, both the resistive phase and the inductive phase of the gas discharge channel proposedby Martin1 were implemented. The difference between the signal recorded just after the spark-gap (V2) and the one recorded some tens of millimeters forward (V2') is the time delay due to the displacement of the measurement point. Additionally, when comparing the voltage signal recorded just before the spark-gap (V1) with the signal recorded some tens of millimeters backward (V1'), two differences can be observed. The former is the delay in the onset of the two signals. The second difference is a variation in the waveform of the signals. A hypothesis was formulated claiming that this is because the sensor does not record all the charge moving along the transmission line. To confirm this hypothesis, both the charge stored up to the D-dot sensor location and also the charge stored up until the spark-gap were calculated on the basis of EMTP-ATP simulations. The difference between these charges (21.63 nC) was compared with the charge stored in the segment of the transmission line (21.99 nC). The results of these calculations show a difference of 1.6 %, thus the hypothesis was validated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信