不同血压及其长期变异性对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病肾病发展的影响

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Weiyan Zhu, Lichen Xu, Xue Chen, Yau-Jiunn Lee, Zongjun Zhang, Qingqing Lou
{"title":"不同血压及其长期变异性对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病肾病发展的影响","authors":"Weiyan Zhu, Lichen Xu, Xue Chen, Yau-Jiunn Lee, Zongjun Zhang, Qingqing Lou","doi":"10.1080/10641963.2022.2071917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aim To explore the relationship between long-term variabilities in different blood pressure variables and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design A retrospective study. Methods This study included 3050 patients with type 2 diabetes whose metabolic parameters were regularly checked. Intrapersonal means and standard deviations (SDs) of all recorded systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP) measurements were calculated. Subjects were divided into four groups: Q1 (SBP-Mean < 130, SBP-SD < 11.06); Q2 (SBP-Mean < 130, SBP-SD ≥ 11.06); Q3 (SBP-Mean ≥ 130, SBP-SD < 11.06); Q4 (SBP-Mean ≥ 130, SBP-SD ≥ 11.06). Similarly, based on whether the PP-Mean was higher or lower than 80 mmHg (average PP-Mean) and the PP-SD was higher or lower than 6.48 mmHg (average PP-SD), the involved patients were redivided into Q1’~ Q4’ groups. Results Adjusted for age, sex and diabetes duration, results revealed that the SBP-Mean, SBP-SD, PP-Mean and PP-SD were risk factors for DKD. Meanwhile, patients in the Q4 group had the highest DKD prevalence (HR = 1.976, p < .001), while Q1 group had the lowest. In addition, patients in the Q3 group (HR = 1.614, P < .001) had a higher risk of DKD than those in the Q2 group (HR = 1.408, P < .001). After re-stratification by PP-Mean and PP-SD, patients in the Q4’ group had the highest risk of DKD (HR = 1.370, p < .001), while those in the Q1’ group had the lowest risk. Patients in the Q3’ group (HR = 1.266, p < .001) had a higher risk of DKD than those in the Q2’ group (HR = 1.212, p < .001).","PeriodicalId":10333,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","volume":"85 1","pages":"464 - 469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different blood pressures and their long-term variability on the development of diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Weiyan Zhu, Lichen Xu, Xue Chen, Yau-Jiunn Lee, Zongjun Zhang, Qingqing Lou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10641963.2022.2071917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Aim To explore the relationship between long-term variabilities in different blood pressure variables and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design A retrospective study. Methods This study included 3050 patients with type 2 diabetes whose metabolic parameters were regularly checked. Intrapersonal means and standard deviations (SDs) of all recorded systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP) measurements were calculated. Subjects were divided into four groups: Q1 (SBP-Mean < 130, SBP-SD < 11.06); Q2 (SBP-Mean < 130, SBP-SD ≥ 11.06); Q3 (SBP-Mean ≥ 130, SBP-SD < 11.06); Q4 (SBP-Mean ≥ 130, SBP-SD ≥ 11.06). Similarly, based on whether the PP-Mean was higher or lower than 80 mmHg (average PP-Mean) and the PP-SD was higher or lower than 6.48 mmHg (average PP-SD), the involved patients were redivided into Q1’~ Q4’ groups. Results Adjusted for age, sex and diabetes duration, results revealed that the SBP-Mean, SBP-SD, PP-Mean and PP-SD were risk factors for DKD. Meanwhile, patients in the Q4 group had the highest DKD prevalence (HR = 1.976, p < .001), while Q1 group had the lowest. In addition, patients in the Q3 group (HR = 1.614, P < .001) had a higher risk of DKD than those in the Q2 group (HR = 1.408, P < .001). After re-stratification by PP-Mean and PP-SD, patients in the Q4’ group had the highest risk of DKD (HR = 1.370, p < .001), while those in the Q1’ group had the lowest risk. Patients in the Q3’ group (HR = 1.266, p < .001) had a higher risk of DKD than those in the Q2’ group (HR = 1.212, p < .001).\",\"PeriodicalId\":10333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"464 - 469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2022.2071917\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2022.2071917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】目的探讨2型糖尿病患者不同血压变量的长期变异性与糖尿病肾病(DKD)的关系。设计回顾性研究。方法定期检查3050例2型糖尿病患者的代谢指标。计算所有记录的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)和脉压(PP)的个人平均值和标准差(SDs)。受试者分为四组:Q1组(SBP-Mean < 130, SBP-SD < 11.06);Q2 (SBP-Mean < 130, SBP-SD≥11.06);Q3 (SBP-Mean≥130,SBP-SD < 11.06);Q4 (SBP-Mean≥130,SBP-SD≥11.06)。同样,根据PP-Mean高于或低于80 mmHg(平均PP-Mean), PP-SD高于或低于6.48 mmHg(平均PP-SD),将患者重新分为Q1’~ Q4’组。结果经年龄、性别和糖尿病病程调整后,结果显示SBP-Mean、SBP-SD、PP-Mean和PP-SD是DKD的危险因素。同时,Q4组患者DKD患病率最高(HR = 1.976, p < 0.001), Q1组最低。此外,Q3组患者发生DKD的风险(HR = 1.614, P < 0.001)高于Q2组(HR = 1.408, P < 0.001)。经PP-Mean和PP-SD重新分层后,Q4’组患者DKD风险最高(HR = 1.370, p < 0.001), Q1’组患者DKD风险最低。Q3组(HR = 1.266, p < 0.001)患者发生DKD的风险高于Q2组(HR = 1.212, p < 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of different blood pressures and their long-term variability on the development of diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
ABSTRACT Aim To explore the relationship between long-term variabilities in different blood pressure variables and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design A retrospective study. Methods This study included 3050 patients with type 2 diabetes whose metabolic parameters were regularly checked. Intrapersonal means and standard deviations (SDs) of all recorded systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP) measurements were calculated. Subjects were divided into four groups: Q1 (SBP-Mean < 130, SBP-SD < 11.06); Q2 (SBP-Mean < 130, SBP-SD ≥ 11.06); Q3 (SBP-Mean ≥ 130, SBP-SD < 11.06); Q4 (SBP-Mean ≥ 130, SBP-SD ≥ 11.06). Similarly, based on whether the PP-Mean was higher or lower than 80 mmHg (average PP-Mean) and the PP-SD was higher or lower than 6.48 mmHg (average PP-SD), the involved patients were redivided into Q1’~ Q4’ groups. Results Adjusted for age, sex and diabetes duration, results revealed that the SBP-Mean, SBP-SD, PP-Mean and PP-SD were risk factors for DKD. Meanwhile, patients in the Q4 group had the highest DKD prevalence (HR = 1.976, p < .001), while Q1 group had the lowest. In addition, patients in the Q3 group (HR = 1.614, P < .001) had a higher risk of DKD than those in the Q2 group (HR = 1.408, P < .001). After re-stratification by PP-Mean and PP-SD, patients in the Q4’ group had the highest risk of DKD (HR = 1.370, p < .001), while those in the Q1’ group had the lowest risk. Patients in the Q3’ group (HR = 1.266, p < .001) had a higher risk of DKD than those in the Q2’ group (HR = 1.212, p < .001).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.80%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is a reputable journal that has converted to a full Open Access format starting from Volume 45 in 2023. While previous volumes are still accessible through a Pay to Read model, the journal now provides free and open access to its content. It serves as an international platform for the exchange of up-to-date scientific and clinical information concerning both human and animal hypertension. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including full research papers, solicited and unsolicited reviews, and commentaries. Through these publications, the journal aims to enhance current understanding and support the timely detection, management, control, and prevention of hypertension-related conditions. One notable aspect of Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is its coverage of special issues that focus on the proceedings of symposia dedicated to hypertension research. This feature allows researchers and clinicians to delve deeper into the latest advancements in this field. The journal is abstracted and indexed in several renowned databases, including Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes News (Online), Reactions Weekly (Online), CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, International Atomic Energy Agency, and the National Library of Medicine, among others. These affiliations ensure that the journal's content receives broad visibility and facilitates its discoverability by professionals and researchers in related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信