强制性可持续发展报告是否仍然有益?

Astrid Rudyanto
{"title":"强制性可持续发展报告是否仍然有益?","authors":"Astrid Rudyanto","doi":"10.21002/jaki.2021.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The latest regulations in Indonesia (SEOJK No 16/SEOJK.04/2021) have required public companies to make a sustainability report every year in order to increase sustainable in­vestment. Prior to this regulation, several public companies had made sustainability reports and received benefits of sustainability report. This makes issuers ask whether after being obligated, public companies still get the benefits that have been obtained from voluntary sustainability reports and under what conditions the mandatory sustainability reports are beneficial for public companies. This study answers the public companies' doubts by con­ducting a systematic literature review on research on mandatory and voluntary sustainability reports in Q1 and Q2 journals from 2008-2018. Before answering the issuers' doubts, this study explains the reasons why issuers make voluntary sustainability reports and the benefits derived from voluntary sustainability reports. After that, based on previous research, this study explains whether the benefits obtained from voluntary sustainability reports can still be obtained in mandatory sustainability reports. This study found that sus­tainability reports were made because of the desire to benefit from these reports initiated by company leaders coupled with institutional pressure. The benefits of voluntary sustainability reports are the positive perception of shareholders and increased concern for the company's sustainability. Mandatory sustainability reports can still provide some (though not all) of the same benefits as voluntary sustainability reports. In addition, the sustainability report must be able to cover the weaknesses of the voluntary sustainability report with the condi­tion that there is strict legal coercion, strict supervision, and the addition of an obligation to audit sustainability information which is strengthened by market demands to make a sus­tainability report. Therefore, the Indonesian government must pay attention to these condi­tions for this regulation to be implemented properly.","PeriodicalId":31764,"journal":{"name":"JAKI Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IS MANDATORY SUSTAINABILITY REPORT STILL BENEFICIAL?\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Rudyanto\",\"doi\":\"10.21002/jaki.2021.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The latest regulations in Indonesia (SEOJK No 16/SEOJK.04/2021) have required public companies to make a sustainability report every year in order to increase sustainable in­vestment. Prior to this regulation, several public companies had made sustainability reports and received benefits of sustainability report. This makes issuers ask whether after being obligated, public companies still get the benefits that have been obtained from voluntary sustainability reports and under what conditions the mandatory sustainability reports are beneficial for public companies. This study answers the public companies' doubts by con­ducting a systematic literature review on research on mandatory and voluntary sustainability reports in Q1 and Q2 journals from 2008-2018. Before answering the issuers' doubts, this study explains the reasons why issuers make voluntary sustainability reports and the benefits derived from voluntary sustainability reports. After that, based on previous research, this study explains whether the benefits obtained from voluntary sustainability reports can still be obtained in mandatory sustainability reports. This study found that sus­tainability reports were made because of the desire to benefit from these reports initiated by company leaders coupled with institutional pressure. The benefits of voluntary sustainability reports are the positive perception of shareholders and increased concern for the company's sustainability. Mandatory sustainability reports can still provide some (though not all) of the same benefits as voluntary sustainability reports. In addition, the sustainability report must be able to cover the weaknesses of the voluntary sustainability report with the condi­tion that there is strict legal coercion, strict supervision, and the addition of an obligation to audit sustainability information which is strengthened by market demands to make a sus­tainability report. Therefore, the Indonesian government must pay attention to these condi­tions for this regulation to be implemented properly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAKI Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAKI Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2021.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAKI Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2021.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

印度尼西亚的最新法规(SEOJK No . 16/SEOJK.04/2021)要求上市公司每年提交一份可持续发展报告,以增加可持续投资。在此之前,已有多家上市公司发布了可持续发展报告,并获得了可持续发展报告的好处。这让发行人不禁要问,上市公司在承担义务之后,是否还能获得自愿性可持续发展报告所带来的利益,以及强制性可持续发展报告在什么条件下对上市公司有利。本研究通过对2008-2018年第一季度和第二季度期刊上关于强制性和自愿性可持续发展报告的研究进行系统的文献综述,回答了上市公司的疑虑。在回答发行人的疑问之前,本研究首先解释了发行人自愿做可持续报告的原因以及自愿做可持续报告所带来的好处。之后,在前人研究的基础上,本研究解释了自愿性可持续发展报告所获得的效益是否仍然可以在强制性可持续发展报告中获得。本研究发现,可持续发展报告之所以产生,是因为公司领导人希望从这些报告中受益,再加上制度压力。自愿可持续发展报告的好处是股东的积极看法,并增加了对公司可持续发展的关注。强制性可持续发展报告仍然可以提供一些(尽管不是全部)与自愿可持续发展报告相同的好处。此外,可持续发展报告必须能够覆盖自愿可持续发展报告的弱点,条件是有严格的法律强制,严格的监管,并增加审计可持续发展信息的义务,而市场要求加强了可持续发展报告。因此,印尼政府必须重视这些条件,这一规定才能得到适当的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IS MANDATORY SUSTAINABILITY REPORT STILL BENEFICIAL?
The latest regulations in Indonesia (SEOJK No 16/SEOJK.04/2021) have required public companies to make a sustainability report every year in order to increase sustainable in­vestment. Prior to this regulation, several public companies had made sustainability reports and received benefits of sustainability report. This makes issuers ask whether after being obligated, public companies still get the benefits that have been obtained from voluntary sustainability reports and under what conditions the mandatory sustainability reports are beneficial for public companies. This study answers the public companies' doubts by con­ducting a systematic literature review on research on mandatory and voluntary sustainability reports in Q1 and Q2 journals from 2008-2018. Before answering the issuers' doubts, this study explains the reasons why issuers make voluntary sustainability reports and the benefits derived from voluntary sustainability reports. After that, based on previous research, this study explains whether the benefits obtained from voluntary sustainability reports can still be obtained in mandatory sustainability reports. This study found that sus­tainability reports were made because of the desire to benefit from these reports initiated by company leaders coupled with institutional pressure. The benefits of voluntary sustainability reports are the positive perception of shareholders and increased concern for the company's sustainability. Mandatory sustainability reports can still provide some (though not all) of the same benefits as voluntary sustainability reports. In addition, the sustainability report must be able to cover the weaknesses of the voluntary sustainability report with the condi­tion that there is strict legal coercion, strict supervision, and the addition of an obligation to audit sustainability information which is strengthened by market demands to make a sus­tainability report. Therefore, the Indonesian government must pay attention to these condi­tions for this regulation to be implemented properly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信