Feulgen和Papanicolaou染色在证明吸烟对人口腔黏膜细胞的细胞毒性和基因毒性作用中的组织化学比较

Iman Yarmohammadi, Noushin Jalayer Naderi
{"title":"Feulgen和Papanicolaou染色在证明吸烟对人口腔黏膜细胞的细胞毒性和基因毒性作用中的组织化学比较","authors":"Iman Yarmohammadi, Noushin Jalayer Naderi","doi":"10.34172/ajdr.2023.433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Different histochemical stains have been applied to demonstrate the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of cigarette smoking on cells. Feulgen and Papanicolaou were the most popular stains to demonstrate nuclear abnormalities. The aim of this study was to compare Feulgen and Papanicolaou stains in demonstrating the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of cigarette smoking on exfoliated oral mucosa cells. Methods: A total of 31 cigarette smokers and 15 non-smokers were included in this case-control study. Using a wooden spatula, two samples were taken from each participant. The samples from the left buccal mucosa were stained with Feulgen and the right mucosa with Papanicolaou. The mean number of micronuclei and the number of cells with pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis were determined on Feulgen and Papanicolaou-stained slides. The number of counted cells with pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis in 1000 cells/subject was recorded. The mean number of micronuclei was determined by the number of counted micronuclei per 1000 cells per subject. Results: The number of micronuclei was not significantly different between Feulgen and Papanicolaou stained samples (P=0.27). Demonstration of karyolysis (P=0.73) and karyorrhexis (P=0.24) was not significantly different between Feulgen and Papanicolaou staining methods. The Feulgen was significantly more effective in demonstrating pyknosis compared to Papanicolaou (P=0.02). Conclusions: Feulgen and Papanicolaou stains had similar effectiveness in demonstrating DNA alterations (micronucleus) and cellular death features (karyorrhexis and karyolysis). Feulgen was preferable to display pyknosis than Papanicolaou.","PeriodicalId":8679,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Histochemical Comparison of Feulgen and Papanicolaou Stains in Demonstrating Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects of Cigarette Smoking on Human Buccal Mucosa Cells\",\"authors\":\"Iman Yarmohammadi, Noushin Jalayer Naderi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ajdr.2023.433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Different histochemical stains have been applied to demonstrate the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of cigarette smoking on cells. Feulgen and Papanicolaou were the most popular stains to demonstrate nuclear abnormalities. The aim of this study was to compare Feulgen and Papanicolaou stains in demonstrating the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of cigarette smoking on exfoliated oral mucosa cells. Methods: A total of 31 cigarette smokers and 15 non-smokers were included in this case-control study. Using a wooden spatula, two samples were taken from each participant. The samples from the left buccal mucosa were stained with Feulgen and the right mucosa with Papanicolaou. The mean number of micronuclei and the number of cells with pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis were determined on Feulgen and Papanicolaou-stained slides. The number of counted cells with pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis in 1000 cells/subject was recorded. The mean number of micronuclei was determined by the number of counted micronuclei per 1000 cells per subject. Results: The number of micronuclei was not significantly different between Feulgen and Papanicolaou stained samples (P=0.27). Demonstration of karyolysis (P=0.73) and karyorrhexis (P=0.24) was not significantly different between Feulgen and Papanicolaou staining methods. The Feulgen was significantly more effective in demonstrating pyknosis compared to Papanicolaou (P=0.02). Conclusions: Feulgen and Papanicolaou stains had similar effectiveness in demonstrating DNA alterations (micronucleus) and cellular death features (karyorrhexis and karyolysis). Feulgen was preferable to display pyknosis than Papanicolaou.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ajdr.2023.433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ajdr.2023.433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:不同的组织化学染色已经被用来证明吸烟对细胞的细胞毒性和基因毒性作用。Feulgen染色和Papanicolaou染色是显示核异常最常用的染色方法。本研究的目的是比较Feulgen和Papanicolaou染色,以证明吸烟对脱落的口腔粘膜细胞的细胞毒性和基因毒性作用。方法:将31例吸烟者和15例非吸烟者纳入病例对照研究。使用木制刮刀,从每个参与者身上取下两个样本。左颊粘膜行Feulgen染色,右颊粘膜行Papanicolaou染色。在Feulgen和papanicolao染色玻片上测定微核的平均数量以及固缩、核分裂和核溶解的细胞数量。记录每1000个细胞中发生固缩、核分裂和核溶解的细胞数。微核的平均数量由每个受试者每1000个细胞中计算的微核数量确定。结果:Feulgen染色标本与Papanicolaou染色标本微核数目无显著差异(P=0.27)。Feulgen染色法和Papanicolaou染色法的核溶解(P=0.73)和核分裂(P=0.24)无显著差异。与Papanicolaou相比,Feulgen在显示固缩方面更有效(P=0.02)。结论:Feulgen和Papanicolaou染色在显示DNA改变(微核)和细胞死亡特征(核分裂和核溶解)方面具有相似的效果。Feulgen比Papanicolaou更容易出现固缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Histochemical Comparison of Feulgen and Papanicolaou Stains in Demonstrating Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects of Cigarette Smoking on Human Buccal Mucosa Cells
Background: Different histochemical stains have been applied to demonstrate the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of cigarette smoking on cells. Feulgen and Papanicolaou were the most popular stains to demonstrate nuclear abnormalities. The aim of this study was to compare Feulgen and Papanicolaou stains in demonstrating the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of cigarette smoking on exfoliated oral mucosa cells. Methods: A total of 31 cigarette smokers and 15 non-smokers were included in this case-control study. Using a wooden spatula, two samples were taken from each participant. The samples from the left buccal mucosa were stained with Feulgen and the right mucosa with Papanicolaou. The mean number of micronuclei and the number of cells with pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis were determined on Feulgen and Papanicolaou-stained slides. The number of counted cells with pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis in 1000 cells/subject was recorded. The mean number of micronuclei was determined by the number of counted micronuclei per 1000 cells per subject. Results: The number of micronuclei was not significantly different between Feulgen and Papanicolaou stained samples (P=0.27). Demonstration of karyolysis (P=0.73) and karyorrhexis (P=0.24) was not significantly different between Feulgen and Papanicolaou staining methods. The Feulgen was significantly more effective in demonstrating pyknosis compared to Papanicolaou (P=0.02). Conclusions: Feulgen and Papanicolaou stains had similar effectiveness in demonstrating DNA alterations (micronucleus) and cellular death features (karyorrhexis and karyolysis). Feulgen was preferable to display pyknosis than Papanicolaou.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信