严重缺血性脑卒中合并多器官衰竭的数学模型:一项回顾性观察研究

V. Silkin, V. I. Ershov, V. Burdakov, T. Biryukova, A. Bredikhin, T. Y. L. T. Yu. Lozinskaya
{"title":"严重缺血性脑卒中合并多器官衰竭的数学模型:一项回顾性观察研究","authors":"V. Silkin, V. I. Ershov, V. Burdakov, T. Biryukova, A. Bredikhin, T. Y. L. T. Yu. Lozinskaya","doi":"10.21320/1818-474x-2023-1-91-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The development of organ dysfunctions and multiple organ failure (MOF) in patients with severe ischemic stroke (IS) is a factor in aggravating the clinical course and outcome. OBJECTIVE: To study the prognostic aspects of the clinical course and outcomes of severe IS with the development of MOF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 110 patients with severe IS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 16 points). To assess the severity of MOF on days 1 and 5 of hospitalization, standard scales SAPS II, SOFA were used. The predictor significance of the indicators was determined by a comparative regression analysis using the least squares method. RESULTS: In patients with a fatal outcome compared to survivors, a higher severity of MOF on the SAPS II was observed both on the first (31 (25; 39) and 24 (21; 29) respectively, p < 0.0001) and fifth days of the disease (40 (33; 49.5) and 29 (25; 35) respectively, p < 0.0001). In the development of severe IS with MOF, an unfavorable outcome is significantly more often observed in the cardioembolic subtype compared to the atherothrombotic subtype of IS (50.75 and 29.85 % respectively, p = 0.0469). The probable mortality according to comparative regression analysis was significantly higher in cardioembolic stroke for patients with MOF severity from 29 to 49 points on the SAPS II (p = 0.0021). CONCLUSIONS: MOF is the most important predictor of death in severe IS. At the same time, the cardioembolic subtype of IS differ by a higher probable mortality in comparison with the atherothrombotic subtype with the MOF severity in the range of 29–49 points according to the SAPS II scale.","PeriodicalId":93261,"journal":{"name":"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical modeling of severe ischemic stroke with multiple organ failure: a retrospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"V. Silkin, V. I. Ershov, V. Burdakov, T. Biryukova, A. Bredikhin, T. Y. L. T. Yu. Lozinskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.21320/1818-474x-2023-1-91-100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: The development of organ dysfunctions and multiple organ failure (MOF) in patients with severe ischemic stroke (IS) is a factor in aggravating the clinical course and outcome. OBJECTIVE: To study the prognostic aspects of the clinical course and outcomes of severe IS with the development of MOF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 110 patients with severe IS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 16 points). To assess the severity of MOF on days 1 and 5 of hospitalization, standard scales SAPS II, SOFA were used. The predictor significance of the indicators was determined by a comparative regression analysis using the least squares method. RESULTS: In patients with a fatal outcome compared to survivors, a higher severity of MOF on the SAPS II was observed both on the first (31 (25; 39) and 24 (21; 29) respectively, p < 0.0001) and fifth days of the disease (40 (33; 49.5) and 29 (25; 35) respectively, p < 0.0001). In the development of severe IS with MOF, an unfavorable outcome is significantly more often observed in the cardioembolic subtype compared to the atherothrombotic subtype of IS (50.75 and 29.85 % respectively, p = 0.0469). The probable mortality according to comparative regression analysis was significantly higher in cardioembolic stroke for patients with MOF severity from 29 to 49 points on the SAPS II (p = 0.0021). CONCLUSIONS: MOF is the most important predictor of death in severe IS. At the same time, the cardioembolic subtype of IS differ by a higher probable mortality in comparison with the atherothrombotic subtype with the MOF severity in the range of 29–49 points according to the SAPS II scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474x-2023-1-91-100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474x-2023-1-91-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重度缺血性脑卒中(IS)患者器官功能障碍和多器官功能衰竭(MOF)的发展是加重临床病程和预后的一个因素。目的:探讨重症IS患者临床病程及预后与MOF发展的关系。材料与方法:研究纳入110例重度IS患者(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表≥16分)。采用标准量表SAPS II、SOFA评估住院第1天和第5天MOF的严重程度。采用最小二乘法进行比较回归分析,确定各指标的预测显著性。结果:与幸存者相比,在死亡结局的患者中,SAPS II的MOF严重程度更高,在第一次(31 (25);39)和24 (21);29), p < 0.0001)和发病第5天(40 (33;49.5)和29 (25;35), p < 0.0001)。在严重IS合并MOF的发展过程中,心脏栓塞亚型比动脉粥样硬化血栓亚型更容易出现不良结果(分别为50.75%和29.85%,p = 0.0469)。根据比较回归分析,MOF严重程度在SAPS II评分29 ~ 49分的患者,心源性卒中的可能死亡率显著增高(p = 0.0021)。结论:MOF是严重is患者最重要的死亡预测因子。与此同时,心脏栓塞型IS与动脉粥样硬化血栓型相比,其可能的死亡率更高,根据SAPS II评分,MOF严重程度在29-49分之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mathematical modeling of severe ischemic stroke with multiple organ failure: a retrospective observational study
INTRODUCTION: The development of organ dysfunctions and multiple organ failure (MOF) in patients with severe ischemic stroke (IS) is a factor in aggravating the clinical course and outcome. OBJECTIVE: To study the prognostic aspects of the clinical course and outcomes of severe IS with the development of MOF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 110 patients with severe IS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 16 points). To assess the severity of MOF on days 1 and 5 of hospitalization, standard scales SAPS II, SOFA were used. The predictor significance of the indicators was determined by a comparative regression analysis using the least squares method. RESULTS: In patients with a fatal outcome compared to survivors, a higher severity of MOF on the SAPS II was observed both on the first (31 (25; 39) and 24 (21; 29) respectively, p < 0.0001) and fifth days of the disease (40 (33; 49.5) and 29 (25; 35) respectively, p < 0.0001). In the development of severe IS with MOF, an unfavorable outcome is significantly more often observed in the cardioembolic subtype compared to the atherothrombotic subtype of IS (50.75 and 29.85 % respectively, p = 0.0469). The probable mortality according to comparative regression analysis was significantly higher in cardioembolic stroke for patients with MOF severity from 29 to 49 points on the SAPS II (p = 0.0021). CONCLUSIONS: MOF is the most important predictor of death in severe IS. At the same time, the cardioembolic subtype of IS differ by a higher probable mortality in comparison with the atherothrombotic subtype with the MOF severity in the range of 29–49 points according to the SAPS II scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信