氯胺酮-异丙酚(酮酚)与氯胺酮-地西泮在日间手术中镇静镇痛的比较研究

F. Kalam, P. Hussain, Masud Ahmed, Abdullah Masum
{"title":"氯胺酮-异丙酚(酮酚)与氯胺酮-地西泮在日间手术中镇静镇痛的比较研究","authors":"F. Kalam, P. Hussain, Masud Ahmed, Abdullah Masum","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Traditionally Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) is provided by various drugsand its combinations with mixed effect regarding safety and efficacy.\nObjective: The aim of the study was to compare the combination of Ketamine & Propofol (Ketofol) andKetamine-Diazepam for PSA in day case surgery.\nMaterials & Methods: This prospective study was carried out in CMH Dhaka on sixty patients equallydivided in two groups between the period of May 2015 to September 2015. Group I patients receivedInjection Ketamine 1mg/kg & Injection Propofol 1mg/kg combination while group II patients receivedInjection Ketamine 2mg/kg & Injection Diazepam 0.2mg/kg combination. Clinical parameters like pulserate, non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), percentage saturation of oxygen (SpO2) were monitored, recordedand analyzed. Recovery was assessed by Aldred Recovery Score (ARS) and compared between groups.\nResults: Rise of heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were statisticallysignificant in group II patients when compared to group I both during the procedure & recovery but riseof mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significant only during procedure. The recovery time in group IIpatients (24.7 ± 3.6 min) was significantly higher (29.7 ± 4.1 min) than group I patients. Side effects likeexcessive bronchial secretion and postoperative agitation were also significantly lesser in Ketofol group.\nConclusion: Ketofol provides safer and more effective sedation and analgesia than Ketamine andDiazepam combination.\nJBSA 2018; 31(2): 75-82","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedural Sedation & Analgesia by Ketamine-Propofol (Ketofol) And Ketamine-Diazepam Combination In Day Case Surgery - A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"F. Kalam, P. Hussain, Masud Ahmed, Abdullah Masum\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Traditionally Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) is provided by various drugsand its combinations with mixed effect regarding safety and efficacy.\\nObjective: The aim of the study was to compare the combination of Ketamine & Propofol (Ketofol) andKetamine-Diazepam for PSA in day case surgery.\\nMaterials & Methods: This prospective study was carried out in CMH Dhaka on sixty patients equallydivided in two groups between the period of May 2015 to September 2015. Group I patients receivedInjection Ketamine 1mg/kg & Injection Propofol 1mg/kg combination while group II patients receivedInjection Ketamine 2mg/kg & Injection Diazepam 0.2mg/kg combination. Clinical parameters like pulserate, non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), percentage saturation of oxygen (SpO2) were monitored, recordedand analyzed. Recovery was assessed by Aldred Recovery Score (ARS) and compared between groups.\\nResults: Rise of heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were statisticallysignificant in group II patients when compared to group I both during the procedure & recovery but riseof mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significant only during procedure. The recovery time in group IIpatients (24.7 ± 3.6 min) was significantly higher (29.7 ± 4.1 min) than group I patients. Side effects likeexcessive bronchial secretion and postoperative agitation were also significantly lesser in Ketofol group.\\nConclusion: Ketofol provides safer and more effective sedation and analgesia than Ketamine andDiazepam combination.\\nJBSA 2018; 31(2): 75-82\",\"PeriodicalId\":17242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的程序性镇静镇痛(PSA)是由多种药物及其组合提供的,安全性和有效性参差不齐。目的:比较氯胺酮丙泊酚(Ketofol)与氯胺酮安定(氯胺酮-地西泮)在日间手术中治疗PSA的效果。材料与方法:本前瞻性研究于2015年5月至2015年9月在达卡CMH进行,60例患者平均分为两组。ⅰ组患者给予氯胺酮注射1mg/kg +丙泊酚注射1mg/kg联合用药;ⅱ组患者给予氯胺酮注射2mg/kg +地西泮注射0.2mg/kg联合用药。监测、记录并分析脉搏、无创血压(NIBP)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)等临床参数。采用奥尔德雷德恢复评分(ARS)评估恢复情况,并比较两组间的差异。结果:II组患者的心率、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)在手术过程和恢复过程中与I组患者相比均有统计学意义,但平均动脉压(MAP)仅在手术过程中升高。ii组患者恢复时间(24.7±3.6 min)明显高于I组患者(29.7±4.1 min)。酮酚组支气管分泌物过多、术后躁动等副作用明显减轻。结论:酮酚比氯胺酮与地西泮联用更安全、更有效。JBSA 2018;31 (2): 75 - 82
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Procedural Sedation & Analgesia by Ketamine-Propofol (Ketofol) And Ketamine-Diazepam Combination In Day Case Surgery - A Comparative Study
Introduction: Traditionally Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) is provided by various drugsand its combinations with mixed effect regarding safety and efficacy. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the combination of Ketamine & Propofol (Ketofol) andKetamine-Diazepam for PSA in day case surgery. Materials & Methods: This prospective study was carried out in CMH Dhaka on sixty patients equallydivided in two groups between the period of May 2015 to September 2015. Group I patients receivedInjection Ketamine 1mg/kg & Injection Propofol 1mg/kg combination while group II patients receivedInjection Ketamine 2mg/kg & Injection Diazepam 0.2mg/kg combination. Clinical parameters like pulserate, non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), percentage saturation of oxygen (SpO2) were monitored, recordedand analyzed. Recovery was assessed by Aldred Recovery Score (ARS) and compared between groups. Results: Rise of heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were statisticallysignificant in group II patients when compared to group I both during the procedure & recovery but riseof mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significant only during procedure. The recovery time in group IIpatients (24.7 ± 3.6 min) was significantly higher (29.7 ± 4.1 min) than group I patients. Side effects likeexcessive bronchial secretion and postoperative agitation were also significantly lesser in Ketofol group. Conclusion: Ketofol provides safer and more effective sedation and analgesia than Ketamine andDiazepam combination. JBSA 2018; 31(2): 75-82
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信