电子论文元数据政策、工作流程和实践:美国学术机构ETD元数据生命周期调查

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Library Metadata Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/19386389.2020.1780689

E. Flynn, Janet H. Ahrberg

{"title":"电子论文元数据政策、工作流程和实践:美国学术机构ETD元数据生命周期调查","authors":"E. Flynn, Janet H. Ahrberg","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2020.1780689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Academic libraries and graduate schools have a variety of workflows and practices for creating and disseminating metadata for electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs). A survey of United States academic institutions in the fall of 2017 addressed the lifecycle of ETDs and their metadata, including policy setting, metadata creation, and access. Participants from 137 institutions, both public and private, were sent the 23-question survey that contained a combination of qualitative and open-ended questions. This survey helped to identify trends and will expand the ETD literature with its comparison of policies, workflows and practices of ETD metadata.","PeriodicalId":39057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library Metadata","volume":"41 1","pages":"91 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) Metadata Policies, Workflows, and Practices: A Survey of the ETD Metadata Lifecycle at United States Academic Institutions\",\"authors\":\"E. Flynn, Janet H. Ahrberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19386389.2020.1780689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Academic libraries and graduate schools have a variety of workflows and practices for creating and disseminating metadata for electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs). A survey of United States academic institutions in the fall of 2017 addressed the lifecycle of ETDs and their metadata, including policy setting, metadata creation, and access. Participants from 137 institutions, both public and private, were sent the 23-question survey that contained a combination of qualitative and open-ended questions. This survey helped to identify trends and will expand the ETD literature with its comparison of policies, workflows and practices of ETD metadata.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Library Metadata\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Library Metadata\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2020.1780689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library Metadata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2020.1780689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

学术图书馆和研究生院有各种工作流程和实践来创建和传播电子论文和学位论文(ETDs)的元数据。2017年秋季对美国学术机构进行的一项调查探讨了etd及其元数据的生命周期，包括政策制定、元数据创建和访问。来自137家公立和私立机构的参与者被发送了一份23个问题的调查，其中包括定性和开放式问题。这项调查有助于确定趋势，并将通过比较ETD元数据的政策、工作流程和实践来扩展ETD文献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) Metadata Policies, Workflows, and Practices: A Survey of the ETD Metadata Lifecycle at United States Academic Institutions

Abstract Academic libraries and graduate schools have a variety of workflows and practices for creating and disseminating metadata for electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs). A survey of United States academic institutions in the fall of 2017 addressed the lifecycle of ETDs and their metadata, including policy setting, metadata creation, and access. Participants from 137 institutions, both public and private, were sent the 23-question survey that contained a combination of qualitative and open-ended questions. This survey helped to identify trends and will expand the ETD literature with its comparison of policies, workflows and practices of ETD metadata.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Library Metadata Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量