商品持仓限制规则应以必要性认定为基础

H. Till
{"title":"商品持仓限制规则应以必要性认定为基础","authors":"H. Till","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2641331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One hopes that the CFTC will carefully consider how necessary and appropriate the imposition of speculative position limits is, across commodity markets. This article argues that before making such a finding, the agency should (a) review the empirical evidence on the causes of both commodity price volatility and price spikes and (b) study how market participants have learned and responded to the Global Financial Crisis of five years ago.","PeriodicalId":12584,"journal":{"name":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commodity Position Limit Rules Should Be Based on a Finding of Necessity\",\"authors\":\"H. Till\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2641331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One hopes that the CFTC will carefully consider how necessary and appropriate the imposition of speculative position limits is, across commodity markets. This article argues that before making such a finding, the agency should (a) review the empirical evidence on the causes of both commodity price volatility and price spikes and (b) study how market participants have learned and responded to the Global Financial Crisis of five years ago.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Commodity Issues eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Commodity Issues eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2641331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2641331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们希望CFTC仔细考虑在整个大宗商品市场实施投机头寸限制的必要性和适当性。本文认为,在做出这样的发现之前,该机构应该(a)审查关于商品价格波动和价格飙升原因的经验证据,(b)研究市场参与者如何了解和应对五年前的全球金融危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commodity Position Limit Rules Should Be Based on a Finding of Necessity
One hopes that the CFTC will carefully consider how necessary and appropriate the imposition of speculative position limits is, across commodity markets. This article argues that before making such a finding, the agency should (a) review the empirical evidence on the causes of both commodity price volatility and price spikes and (b) study how market participants have learned and responded to the Global Financial Crisis of five years ago.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信