邪恶的问题和上帝的问题

R. Bassett
{"title":"邪恶的问题和上帝的问题","authors":"R. Bassett","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2006.00289.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND THE PROBLEM OF GOD. D. Z. Phillips (2005). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress. Pp. 280 + xxiii, Pb, $25.00. Reviewed by J. Harold Ellens. A few watershed volumes have been written by Christian scholars during the last three decades about the perplexities of human suffering. Notable among them are Nicholas Wolterstorffs autobiographical Lament for a Son (1987), Lewis Smedes' How Can it Be Alright When Everything is All Wrong? (1988), and Philip Yancey's Where is God When It Hurts: A Comforting, Healing Guide for Coping with Hard Times (1990). In that line of inquiry we now have Phillips' work of three parts and 11 chapters. Wolterstoff's book was of enormous help to suffering persons from the outset, and remains so nearly two decades later because it is an existential personal report on what it is to suffer unspeakable loss and get through Christianly. He is not afraid to say aloud that much of the traditional dogma about God's sustaining mechanisms are not real or true, but he leads us to the center and to the essence of the experience of loss and of spiritual resilience. Smedes' piece was a somewhat less satisfying effort to combine psychological observations with theological framework. The result was a nice but not necessary book. Like much of his published work, it was not quite compelling. Yancey's book got a great deal of play, largely, I think, because so much of his work has been enormously appealing to the general public, particularly his, What's So Amazing About Grace. His book on suffering is a folksy how-to book about suffering, with both the few strengths and the numerous weaknesses of all how-to books. It ended up being a kind of analytic narrative, viewing grief and loss from afar. Phillips' new book incites the feeling that one is located somewhere in the scholastic discourse of the Middle Ages, approximately half way between Peter Lombard and Thomas Aquinas. It is a book of philosophy grappling with the speculations of theology. Its character and mode is suggested by the abstruse abstraction of Simone Weil quoted on the fly leaf, setting the tone for the book. \"We have to be careful about the level on which we place the infinite. If we put it on the level which is only suitable for the finite it does not much matter what name we give it.\" Phillips holds the Danforth Chair in Philosophy of Religion at Claremont Graduate University and is Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of Wales, Swansea. His previous recent books are Religion and Friendly Fire (2004), Recovering Religious Concepts (2000), and Religion and the Hermeneutics of Contemplation (2001). …","PeriodicalId":16908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology and Christianity","volume":"114 1","pages":"363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God\",\"authors\":\"R. Bassett\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2006.00289.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND THE PROBLEM OF GOD. D. Z. Phillips (2005). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress. Pp. 280 + xxiii, Pb, $25.00. Reviewed by J. Harold Ellens. A few watershed volumes have been written by Christian scholars during the last three decades about the perplexities of human suffering. Notable among them are Nicholas Wolterstorffs autobiographical Lament for a Son (1987), Lewis Smedes' How Can it Be Alright When Everything is All Wrong? (1988), and Philip Yancey's Where is God When It Hurts: A Comforting, Healing Guide for Coping with Hard Times (1990). In that line of inquiry we now have Phillips' work of three parts and 11 chapters. Wolterstoff's book was of enormous help to suffering persons from the outset, and remains so nearly two decades later because it is an existential personal report on what it is to suffer unspeakable loss and get through Christianly. He is not afraid to say aloud that much of the traditional dogma about God's sustaining mechanisms are not real or true, but he leads us to the center and to the essence of the experience of loss and of spiritual resilience. Smedes' piece was a somewhat less satisfying effort to combine psychological observations with theological framework. The result was a nice but not necessary book. Like much of his published work, it was not quite compelling. Yancey's book got a great deal of play, largely, I think, because so much of his work has been enormously appealing to the general public, particularly his, What's So Amazing About Grace. His book on suffering is a folksy how-to book about suffering, with both the few strengths and the numerous weaknesses of all how-to books. It ended up being a kind of analytic narrative, viewing grief and loss from afar. Phillips' new book incites the feeling that one is located somewhere in the scholastic discourse of the Middle Ages, approximately half way between Peter Lombard and Thomas Aquinas. It is a book of philosophy grappling with the speculations of theology. Its character and mode is suggested by the abstruse abstraction of Simone Weil quoted on the fly leaf, setting the tone for the book. \\\"We have to be careful about the level on which we place the infinite. If we put it on the level which is only suitable for the finite it does not much matter what name we give it.\\\" Phillips holds the Danforth Chair in Philosophy of Religion at Claremont Graduate University and is Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of Wales, Swansea. His previous recent books are Religion and Friendly Fire (2004), Recovering Religious Concepts (2000), and Religion and the Hermeneutics of Contemplation (2001). …\",\"PeriodicalId\":16908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychology and Christianity\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychology and Christianity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.2006.00289.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology and Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.2006.00289.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

邪恶的问题和上帝的问题。d.z.菲利普斯(2005)。明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州:堡垒。Pp. 280 + xxiii, Pb, $25.00。J. Harold Ellens评论。在过去的三十年里,基督教学者写了一些关于人类苦难的困惑的分水岭卷。其中著名的有尼古拉斯·沃特斯托夫的自传《儿子的悲歌》(1987),刘易斯·斯米德斯的《当一切都是错的,它怎么能好起来?》(1988),以及菲利普·扬西的《受伤时上帝在哪里:应对困难时期的安慰和治疗指南》(1990)。在这条研究路线中,我们现在有菲利普斯的三部分和11章的工作。Wolterstoff的书从一开始就对受苦的人提供了巨大的帮助,并且在近二十年后仍然如此,因为它是一份存在主义的个人报告,讲述了遭受无法形容的损失并度过难关的感觉。他不怕大声说,很多关于上帝维持机制的传统教条是不真实的,但他把我们带到了失去和精神恢复经验的中心和本质。斯米德斯的作品在将心理学观察与神学框架结合起来方面做得不那么令人满意。结果是一本不错但没有必要的书。就像他发表的许多作品一样,这本书并不十分引人注目。扬西的书受到了广泛的关注,我认为,很大程度上是因为他的很多作品都非常吸引大众,尤其是他的《格蕾丝有什么了不起》。他关于苦难的书是一本通俗易懂的关于苦难的指南书,既有所有指南书的少数优点,也有许多缺点。它最终成为一种分析性叙事,从远处观察悲伤和失去。菲利普斯的新书激起了一种感觉,即人们处于中世纪学术话语的某个地方,大约介于彼得·伦巴第和托马斯·阿奎那之间。这是一本与神学思辨斗争的哲学著作。它的性格和模式是通过引用西蒙娜·韦尔在飞叶上的深奥抽象来暗示的,为这本书奠定了基调。“我们必须小心我们放置无限的水平。如果我们把它放在只适用于有限事物的水平上那么我们给它取什么名字都无所谓了"菲利普斯是克莱蒙特研究生大学宗教哲学的丹福斯教授,也是斯旺西威尔士大学的名誉哲学教授。他最近的著作有《宗教与友军之火》(2004)、《恢复宗教概念》(2000)和《宗教与沉思的解释学》(2001)。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND THE PROBLEM OF GOD. D. Z. Phillips (2005). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress. Pp. 280 + xxiii, Pb, $25.00. Reviewed by J. Harold Ellens. A few watershed volumes have been written by Christian scholars during the last three decades about the perplexities of human suffering. Notable among them are Nicholas Wolterstorffs autobiographical Lament for a Son (1987), Lewis Smedes' How Can it Be Alright When Everything is All Wrong? (1988), and Philip Yancey's Where is God When It Hurts: A Comforting, Healing Guide for Coping with Hard Times (1990). In that line of inquiry we now have Phillips' work of three parts and 11 chapters. Wolterstoff's book was of enormous help to suffering persons from the outset, and remains so nearly two decades later because it is an existential personal report on what it is to suffer unspeakable loss and get through Christianly. He is not afraid to say aloud that much of the traditional dogma about God's sustaining mechanisms are not real or true, but he leads us to the center and to the essence of the experience of loss and of spiritual resilience. Smedes' piece was a somewhat less satisfying effort to combine psychological observations with theological framework. The result was a nice but not necessary book. Like much of his published work, it was not quite compelling. Yancey's book got a great deal of play, largely, I think, because so much of his work has been enormously appealing to the general public, particularly his, What's So Amazing About Grace. His book on suffering is a folksy how-to book about suffering, with both the few strengths and the numerous weaknesses of all how-to books. It ended up being a kind of analytic narrative, viewing grief and loss from afar. Phillips' new book incites the feeling that one is located somewhere in the scholastic discourse of the Middle Ages, approximately half way between Peter Lombard and Thomas Aquinas. It is a book of philosophy grappling with the speculations of theology. Its character and mode is suggested by the abstruse abstraction of Simone Weil quoted on the fly leaf, setting the tone for the book. "We have to be careful about the level on which we place the infinite. If we put it on the level which is only suitable for the finite it does not much matter what name we give it." Phillips holds the Danforth Chair in Philosophy of Religion at Claremont Graduate University and is Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of Wales, Swansea. His previous recent books are Religion and Friendly Fire (2004), Recovering Religious Concepts (2000), and Religion and the Hermeneutics of Contemplation (2001). …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信