Achmad Fadel, Hasan Mujtaba
{"title":"PEMIKIRAN ATEISME RICHARD DAWKINS:","authors":"Achmad Fadel, Hasan Mujtaba","doi":"10.20871/KPJIPM.V6I2.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History shows a constant debate between religionists and atheists. Armstrong wrote that any new concept of divinity that emerged in society and rejected established traditions would be labeled as atheist and marginalized. Today, one of the movements that are quite criticized by religious people is New Atheism. He has a great influence in the western world. Richard Dawkins, as the founder, composed a special work entitled God Delusion as a response to the rejection of the supernatural and personal concept of God through Argument from Improbability. He explained that the complexity of the universe is almost impossible to come from a simple entity, namely God, but at the same time, a complex creator also produces infinite regress. Therefore, he took the gradual evolution of the universe as an alternative explanation for the formation of nature. This article will interpret Richard Dawkins’ points of thought in God Delusion, and analyze them using the principles of logic and philosophy. As a result, the author found several weaknesses in the argument from improbability and the lens in viewing religion. First, the assumption of rejecting the argument of resentment is only to deny the supernatural concept of God. Second, the use of statistical probability arguments limited to natural laws does not lead to supernatural concepts. Third, complexity stems primarily from simplicity. Lastly, ignorance of the criteria for the existence of consequences for causes.","PeriodicalId":31008,"journal":{"name":"Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20871/KPJIPM.V6I2.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

历史表明,宗教主义者和无神论者之间一直存在争论。阿姆斯特朗写道,在社会中出现的任何新的神性概念,如果违背了既定的传统,就会被贴上无神论者的标签,被边缘化。今天,新无神论运动受到宗教人士的批评。他在西方世界有很大的影响。理查德·道金斯作为创始人,创作了一部名为《上帝错觉》的特殊作品,作为对《非概率论证》中对超自然的、个人的上帝概念的拒绝的回应。他解释说,宇宙的复杂性几乎不可能来自一个简单的实体,即上帝,但与此同时,一个复杂的创造者也会产生无限的回归。因此,他把宇宙的逐渐演化作为自然形成的另一种解释。本文将解读理查德·道金斯在《上帝错觉》中的思想要点,并运用逻辑和哲学的原理对其进行分析。因此,作者从非概率和观察宗教的镜头中发现了论点中的几个弱点。首先,拒绝怨恨论的假设只是否认上帝的超自然概念。其次,使用仅限于自然规律的统计概率论证不会导致超自然的概念。第三,复杂性主要来源于简单性。最后,对因果关系存在的标准的无知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PEMIKIRAN ATEISME RICHARD DAWKINS:
History shows a constant debate between religionists and atheists. Armstrong wrote that any new concept of divinity that emerged in society and rejected established traditions would be labeled as atheist and marginalized. Today, one of the movements that are quite criticized by religious people is New Atheism. He has a great influence in the western world. Richard Dawkins, as the founder, composed a special work entitled God Delusion as a response to the rejection of the supernatural and personal concept of God through Argument from Improbability. He explained that the complexity of the universe is almost impossible to come from a simple entity, namely God, but at the same time, a complex creator also produces infinite regress. Therefore, he took the gradual evolution of the universe as an alternative explanation for the formation of nature. This article will interpret Richard Dawkins’ points of thought in God Delusion, and analyze them using the principles of logic and philosophy. As a result, the author found several weaknesses in the argument from improbability and the lens in viewing religion. First, the assumption of rejecting the argument of resentment is only to deny the supernatural concept of God. Second, the use of statistical probability arguments limited to natural laws does not lead to supernatural concepts. Third, complexity stems primarily from simplicity. Lastly, ignorance of the criteria for the existence of consequences for causes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信