全髋关节置换术中的常规选择--双活动度髋臼杯

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Ignacio Aguado-Maestro, Inés de Blas-Sanz, Ana Elena Sanz-Peñas, Silvia Virginia Campesino-Nieto, Jesús Diez-Rodríguez, Sergio Valle-López, Alberto Espinel-Riol, Diego Fernández-Díez, Manuel García-Alonso
{"title":"全髋关节置换术中的常规选择--双活动度髋臼杯","authors":"Ignacio Aguado-Maestro, Inés de Blas-Sanz, Ana Elena Sanz-Peñas, Silvia Virginia Campesino-Nieto, Jesús Diez-Rodríguez, Sergio Valle-López, Alberto Espinel-Riol, Diego Fernández-Díez, Manuel García-Alonso","doi":"10.3390/medicina58040528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the most successful surgical procedure in orthopedics. However, dislocation remains the main indication for surgical revision. New designs of dual mobility cups (DMC) have lowered the classical complications and have extended the indications of DMC in elective surgeries. Our aim is to assess the trend of DMC indications in THA as well as the incidence of their dislocation. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing THA with DMC during the years 2015 and 2021. The original indication for DMC included patients sustaining neck of femur fractures (NOF#) and associated risk factors for dislocations. Five years later, DMC was considered our standard of care in total hip arthroplasty. The approach (anterolateral or posterolateral) was chosen by the surgeon according to his/her preferences, as was the implant. Data collected included patients' demographics, diagnosis, admission time, surgical approach, cup models, and inclination and complications. Patients sustaining a hip dislocation were prospectively reviewed and assessed for treatment received, new dislocations, and need for surgical revision. Two groups were created for the analysis according to the presence or absence of dislocation during follow-up. <i>Results:</i> In the analysis, 531 arthroplasties were included (mean age 72.2 years) with a mean follow-up of 2.86 years. The trend of indications for DMC increased from 16% of THA in 2015 to 78% of THA in 2021. We found a total of 8 dislocations (1.5%), none of them associated with elective surgery. Closed reduction was unsatisfactory in four cases (50%). There was one case of intraprosthetic dislocation. Dislocations were associated to smaller heads (22 mm) (1.5% vs. 25%, <i>p</i> = 0.008) and cups (51.2 mm vs. 48.7 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and posterior approach (62.5% vs. 37.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.011). <i>Conclusion:</i> Dual mobility cups are a great option to reduce the risk of dislocation after a THA both in the neck of femur fractures and elective cases. The use of an anterolateral approach in THA after a neck or femur fracture might considerably decrease the risk of dislocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":53950,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Classical Journal","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual Mobility Cups as the Routine Choice in Total Hip Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Ignacio Aguado-Maestro, Inés de Blas-Sanz, Ana Elena Sanz-Peñas, Silvia Virginia Campesino-Nieto, Jesús Diez-Rodríguez, Sergio Valle-López, Alberto Espinel-Riol, Diego Fernández-Díez, Manuel García-Alonso\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicina58040528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the most successful surgical procedure in orthopedics. However, dislocation remains the main indication for surgical revision. New designs of dual mobility cups (DMC) have lowered the classical complications and have extended the indications of DMC in elective surgeries. Our aim is to assess the trend of DMC indications in THA as well as the incidence of their dislocation. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing THA with DMC during the years 2015 and 2021. The original indication for DMC included patients sustaining neck of femur fractures (NOF#) and associated risk factors for dislocations. Five years later, DMC was considered our standard of care in total hip arthroplasty. The approach (anterolateral or posterolateral) was chosen by the surgeon according to his/her preferences, as was the implant. Data collected included patients' demographics, diagnosis, admission time, surgical approach, cup models, and inclination and complications. Patients sustaining a hip dislocation were prospectively reviewed and assessed for treatment received, new dislocations, and need for surgical revision. Two groups were created for the analysis according to the presence or absence of dislocation during follow-up. <i>Results:</i> In the analysis, 531 arthroplasties were included (mean age 72.2 years) with a mean follow-up of 2.86 years. The trend of indications for DMC increased from 16% of THA in 2015 to 78% of THA in 2021. We found a total of 8 dislocations (1.5%), none of them associated with elective surgery. Closed reduction was unsatisfactory in four cases (50%). There was one case of intraprosthetic dislocation. Dislocations were associated to smaller heads (22 mm) (1.5% vs. 25%, <i>p</i> = 0.008) and cups (51.2 mm vs. 48.7 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and posterior approach (62.5% vs. 37.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.011). <i>Conclusion:</i> Dual mobility cups are a great option to reduce the risk of dislocation after a THA both in the neck of femur fractures and elective cases. The use of an anterolateral approach in THA after a neck or femur fracture might considerably decrease the risk of dislocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambridge Classical Journal\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029134/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambridge Classical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040528\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Classical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:全髋关节置换术(THA)被认为是矫形外科最成功的外科手术。然而,脱位仍是手术翻修的主要适应症。双活动度髋臼杯(DMC)的新设计降低了传统并发症的发生率,扩大了DMC在择期手术中的适应症。我们的目的是评估 DMC 在 THA 中的适应症趋势及其脱位发生率。材料和方法:我们对 2015 年至 2021 年期间所有接受 THA 并使用 DMC 的患者进行了回顾性分析。DMC 最初的适应症包括股骨颈骨折(NOF#)患者及相关脱位风险因素。五年后,DMC 被认为是全髋关节置换术的护理标准。手术方式(前外侧或后外侧)由外科医生根据自己的喜好选择,植入物也是如此。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、诊断、入院时间、手术方式、髋臼杯型号、倾向和并发症。对髋关节脱位患者进行了前瞻性回顾,并评估了所接受的治疗、新的脱位以及手术翻修的必要性。根据随访期间有无脱位情况将患者分为两组进行分析。结果:分析共纳入了 531 例关节置换术(平均年龄 72.2 岁),平均随访时间为 2.86 年。DMC的适应症从2015年的16%增加到2021年的78%。我们共发现了8例脱位(1.5%),其中没有一例与择期手术有关。4例(50%)闭合复位不满意。其中一例为假体内脱位。脱位与较小的假体头(22 毫米)(1.5% 对 25%,p = 0.008)和假体杯(51.2 毫米对 48.7 毫米,p = 0.038)以及后入路(62.5% 对 37.5%,p = 0.011)有关。结论:无论是股骨颈骨折还是择期手术,双活动度髋臼杯都是降低THA术后脱位风险的最佳选择。在股骨颈或股骨骨折后的全人工关节置换术中使用前外侧入路可大大降低脱位风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual Mobility Cups as the Routine Choice in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background and Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the most successful surgical procedure in orthopedics. However, dislocation remains the main indication for surgical revision. New designs of dual mobility cups (DMC) have lowered the classical complications and have extended the indications of DMC in elective surgeries. Our aim is to assess the trend of DMC indications in THA as well as the incidence of their dislocation. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing THA with DMC during the years 2015 and 2021. The original indication for DMC included patients sustaining neck of femur fractures (NOF#) and associated risk factors for dislocations. Five years later, DMC was considered our standard of care in total hip arthroplasty. The approach (anterolateral or posterolateral) was chosen by the surgeon according to his/her preferences, as was the implant. Data collected included patients' demographics, diagnosis, admission time, surgical approach, cup models, and inclination and complications. Patients sustaining a hip dislocation were prospectively reviewed and assessed for treatment received, new dislocations, and need for surgical revision. Two groups were created for the analysis according to the presence or absence of dislocation during follow-up. Results: In the analysis, 531 arthroplasties were included (mean age 72.2 years) with a mean follow-up of 2.86 years. The trend of indications for DMC increased from 16% of THA in 2015 to 78% of THA in 2021. We found a total of 8 dislocations (1.5%), none of them associated with elective surgery. Closed reduction was unsatisfactory in four cases (50%). There was one case of intraprosthetic dislocation. Dislocations were associated to smaller heads (22 mm) (1.5% vs. 25%, p = 0.008) and cups (51.2 mm vs. 48.7 mm, p = 0.038) and posterior approach (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.011). Conclusion: Dual mobility cups are a great option to reduce the risk of dislocation after a THA both in the neck of femur fractures and elective cases. The use of an anterolateral approach in THA after a neck or femur fracture might considerably decrease the risk of dislocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信