正统冠状动脉搭桥手术:外科介入冠状动脉疾病的金标准

John M. Alvarez FRACS, Jennifer C. Cooke FRACP, Gil C. Shardey FRACS, Jacob Goldstein FRACS, Richard W. Harper FRACP
{"title":"正统冠状动脉搭桥手术:外科介入冠状动脉疾病的金标准","authors":"John M. Alvarez FRACS,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Cooke FRACP,&nbsp;Gil C. Shardey FRACS,&nbsp;Jacob Goldstein FRACS,&nbsp;Richard W. Harper FRACP","doi":"10.1016/S1328-0163(99)90051-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background:</em> Advances in technology have produced a plethora of means to perform coronary revascularisation either surgically (that is, off pump CABG, Heartport CABG) and/or percutaneously (that is, stenting, rotablation). When comparing the results obtained by these new technologies, too often reference is made to results from the CABG operation of previous eras. Before tried and tested procedures are superseded by new, radical ones, it is essential to establish what the contemporary results of the CABG operation are on an unselected, general patient population. <em>Aim:</em> To examine contemporary results of primary orthodox CABG surgery in an unselected patient population from an Australian teaching hospital. <em>Method:</em> This was a prospective study of all patients having primary CABG surgery from 1 January 1996 to 30 June 1998. <em>Results:</em> 1002 patients had CABG. The mean age was 63.1 years, 33% were aged more than 70 years. Perioperative AMI occurred in 0.2% and CVA in 0.7%. Operative mortality for urgent or elective CABG was 0.4%. At 12 months, freedom from a repeat revascularisation procedure was 97%. <em>Conclusion:</em> Contemporary CABG surgery is associated with a very low morbidity and mortality. This is the gold standard in surgical coronary artery disease intervention and forms the benchmark to which alternative treatment strategies must be compared.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101218,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Heart Journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 148-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1328-0163(99)90051-9","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthodox coronary artery bypass surgery: The gold standard in surgical coronary artery disease intervention\",\"authors\":\"John M. Alvarez FRACS,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Cooke FRACP,&nbsp;Gil C. Shardey FRACS,&nbsp;Jacob Goldstein FRACS,&nbsp;Richard W. Harper FRACP\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1328-0163(99)90051-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Background:</em> Advances in technology have produced a plethora of means to perform coronary revascularisation either surgically (that is, off pump CABG, Heartport CABG) and/or percutaneously (that is, stenting, rotablation). When comparing the results obtained by these new technologies, too often reference is made to results from the CABG operation of previous eras. Before tried and tested procedures are superseded by new, radical ones, it is essential to establish what the contemporary results of the CABG operation are on an unselected, general patient population. <em>Aim:</em> To examine contemporary results of primary orthodox CABG surgery in an unselected patient population from an Australian teaching hospital. <em>Method:</em> This was a prospective study of all patients having primary CABG surgery from 1 January 1996 to 30 June 1998. <em>Results:</em> 1002 patients had CABG. The mean age was 63.1 years, 33% were aged more than 70 years. Perioperative AMI occurred in 0.2% and CVA in 0.7%. Operative mortality for urgent or elective CABG was 0.4%. At 12 months, freedom from a repeat revascularisation procedure was 97%. <em>Conclusion:</em> Contemporary CABG surgery is associated with a very low morbidity and mortality. This is the gold standard in surgical coronary artery disease intervention and forms the benchmark to which alternative treatment strategies must be compared.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Asia Pacific Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 148-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1328-0163(99)90051-9\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Asia Pacific Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1328016399900519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1328016399900519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:技术的进步已经产生了大量的冠状动脉血管重建术的手段,无论是手术(即无泵冠脉搭桥、心口冠脉搭桥)和/或经皮(即支架置入、旋转)。在比较这些新技术所获得的结果时,往往会参考以往CABG手术的结果。在经过尝试和测试的手术被新的、激进的手术所取代之前,有必要确定CABG手术在未选择的普通患者群体中的当代结果。目的:探讨澳大利亚一家教学医院未选定患者群体的原发性正统冠状动脉搭桥手术的当代结果。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象为1996年1月1日至1998年6月30日接受原发性冠脉搭桥手术的所有患者。结果:1002例患者行冠脉搭桥。平均年龄63.1岁,70岁以上占33%。围手术期AMI发生率为0.2%,CVA发生率为0.7%。紧急或择期冠脉搭桥的手术死亡率为0.4%。12个月时,重复血运重建手术的成功率为97%。结论:当代冠脉搭桥手术的发病率和死亡率都很低。这是外科冠状动脉疾病干预的金标准,并形成了替代治疗策略必须进行比较的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orthodox coronary artery bypass surgery: The gold standard in surgical coronary artery disease intervention

Background: Advances in technology have produced a plethora of means to perform coronary revascularisation either surgically (that is, off pump CABG, Heartport CABG) and/or percutaneously (that is, stenting, rotablation). When comparing the results obtained by these new technologies, too often reference is made to results from the CABG operation of previous eras. Before tried and tested procedures are superseded by new, radical ones, it is essential to establish what the contemporary results of the CABG operation are on an unselected, general patient population. Aim: To examine contemporary results of primary orthodox CABG surgery in an unselected patient population from an Australian teaching hospital. Method: This was a prospective study of all patients having primary CABG surgery from 1 January 1996 to 30 June 1998. Results: 1002 patients had CABG. The mean age was 63.1 years, 33% were aged more than 70 years. Perioperative AMI occurred in 0.2% and CVA in 0.7%. Operative mortality for urgent or elective CABG was 0.4%. At 12 months, freedom from a repeat revascularisation procedure was 97%. Conclusion: Contemporary CABG surgery is associated with a very low morbidity and mortality. This is the gold standard in surgical coronary artery disease intervention and forms the benchmark to which alternative treatment strategies must be compared.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信