{"title":"静脉咪达唑仑预用药对异氟醚麻醉儿童人工耳蜗术后康复的影响","authors":"M. Hosny, A. N. Saleh, W. Abdelaal, T. Rabie","doi":"10.2174/2589645801913010047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Midazolam, given by varying routes, is widely used as a premedication. This study\n was performed to investigate the effect of IV midazolam premedication on\n the recovery characteristics from isoflurane anesthesia in pediatric patients\n undergoing cochlear implant surgery.\n \n \n \n In this double-blind randomized study, a total of 60 unilateral cochlear implants procedures were performed on 60 children aged 1 – 6 years. They were 29 males (48.3%) and 31 females (51.7%). Patients were randomly allocated in one of two groups (M and S). Each group included 30 participants. Patients in group M received 0.01 mg/kg IV midazolam in 2 ml of 0.9% saline, while patients in group S received equal volume of 0.9% saline, two minutes before induction. Recovery times from discontinuation of isoflurane were recorded. Postoperative pain was assessed using Objective Pain Discomfort Score (OPDS). Emergence Agitation (EA) was recorded based on Aono’s four-point scale.\n \n \n There were statistically significant differences between patients pre-medicated with IV midazolam and those of the normal saline group as regards all measured recovery parameters (p<0.001). Patients in group M scored higher than those in Group S on the OPDS. Yet, this difference didn't show statistical significance (p=0.438) Among patients pre-medicated with midazolam, 17 (56.6%) suffered from EA compared to 12 (40%) patients from the other group. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.196).\n \n \n \n Premedication with IV midazolam delayed recovery in pediatric patients undergoing moderately-long procedures when isoflurane was used as the inhalation anesthetic, while its effect on EA remains uncertain.\n","PeriodicalId":22862,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of IV Midazolam Premedication on the Recovery of Pediatric Patients after Isoflurane Anesthesia for Cochlear Implant Surgery\",\"authors\":\"M. Hosny, A. N. Saleh, W. Abdelaal, T. Rabie\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2589645801913010047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Midazolam, given by varying routes, is widely used as a premedication. This study\\n was performed to investigate the effect of IV midazolam premedication on\\n the recovery characteristics from isoflurane anesthesia in pediatric patients\\n undergoing cochlear implant surgery.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this double-blind randomized study, a total of 60 unilateral cochlear implants procedures were performed on 60 children aged 1 – 6 years. They were 29 males (48.3%) and 31 females (51.7%). Patients were randomly allocated in one of two groups (M and S). Each group included 30 participants. Patients in group M received 0.01 mg/kg IV midazolam in 2 ml of 0.9% saline, while patients in group S received equal volume of 0.9% saline, two minutes before induction. Recovery times from discontinuation of isoflurane were recorded. Postoperative pain was assessed using Objective Pain Discomfort Score (OPDS). Emergence Agitation (EA) was recorded based on Aono’s four-point scale.\\n \\n \\n There were statistically significant differences between patients pre-medicated with IV midazolam and those of the normal saline group as regards all measured recovery parameters (p<0.001). Patients in group M scored higher than those in Group S on the OPDS. Yet, this difference didn't show statistical significance (p=0.438) Among patients pre-medicated with midazolam, 17 (56.6%) suffered from EA compared to 12 (40%) patients from the other group. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.196).\\n \\n \\n \\n Premedication with IV midazolam delayed recovery in pediatric patients undergoing moderately-long procedures when isoflurane was used as the inhalation anesthetic, while its effect on EA remains uncertain.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":22862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Anesthesia Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Anesthesia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2589645801913010047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2589645801913010047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
咪达唑仑,通过不同的途径给予,被广泛用作前用药。本研究旨在探讨静脉咪达唑仑预用药对异氟醚麻醉后儿童人工耳蜗术后恢复的影响。在这项双盲随机研究中,对60名1 - 6岁的儿童进行了60例单侧人工耳蜗植入手术。男性29例(48.3%),女性31例(51.7%)。患者随机分为两组(M组和S组),每组30人。M组患者在诱导前2分钟给予0.01 mg/kg咪达唑仑静脉滴注于2 ml 0.9%生理盐水中,S组患者给予等体积0.9%生理盐水。记录停止使用异氟醚后的恢复时间。术后疼痛采用客观疼痛不适评分(OPDS)进行评估。根据Aono四分制记录涌现性躁动(EA)。静脉滴注咪达唑仑组与生理盐水组的各项恢复指标均有统计学差异(p<0.001)。M组患者OPDS评分高于S组。但差异无统计学意义(p=0.438)。在预先给予咪达唑仑的患者中,有17例(56.6%)发生EA,而另一组有12例(40%)发生EA。差异无统计学意义(p=0.196)。当使用异氟醚作为吸入麻醉剂时,静脉滴注咪达唑仑延迟了接受中等时间手术的儿科患者的恢复,而其对EA的影响仍不确定。
Effect of IV Midazolam Premedication on the Recovery of Pediatric Patients after Isoflurane Anesthesia for Cochlear Implant Surgery
Midazolam, given by varying routes, is widely used as a premedication. This study
was performed to investigate the effect of IV midazolam premedication on
the recovery characteristics from isoflurane anesthesia in pediatric patients
undergoing cochlear implant surgery.
In this double-blind randomized study, a total of 60 unilateral cochlear implants procedures were performed on 60 children aged 1 – 6 years. They were 29 males (48.3%) and 31 females (51.7%). Patients were randomly allocated in one of two groups (M and S). Each group included 30 participants. Patients in group M received 0.01 mg/kg IV midazolam in 2 ml of 0.9% saline, while patients in group S received equal volume of 0.9% saline, two minutes before induction. Recovery times from discontinuation of isoflurane were recorded. Postoperative pain was assessed using Objective Pain Discomfort Score (OPDS). Emergence Agitation (EA) was recorded based on Aono’s four-point scale.
There were statistically significant differences between patients pre-medicated with IV midazolam and those of the normal saline group as regards all measured recovery parameters (p<0.001). Patients in group M scored higher than those in Group S on the OPDS. Yet, this difference didn't show statistical significance (p=0.438) Among patients pre-medicated with midazolam, 17 (56.6%) suffered from EA compared to 12 (40%) patients from the other group. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.196).
Premedication with IV midazolam delayed recovery in pediatric patients undergoing moderately-long procedures when isoflurane was used as the inhalation anesthetic, while its effect on EA remains uncertain.