社交媒体内容与社会比较:对审计质量影响的实验检验

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Stephen Kuselias, Jon K. Lauck, Summer Williams
{"title":"社交媒体内容与社会比较:对审计质量影响的实验检验","authors":"Stephen Kuselias, Jon K. Lauck, Summer Williams","doi":"10.2308/ajpt-18-154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent evidence suggests that auditors access social media platforms habitually throughout the workday. While exploratory research has found concerning effects related to social media usage, existing research has not investigated how viewing social media content might affect auditors. Using an experiment that holds social media usage constant, we examine how social media content impacts auditors' task performance. Relying on social comparison theory, we predict and find that the collection and evaluation of audit evidence (an integral component of audit quality) suffers when auditors view posts of peers' rewarding social experiences compared to those who do not view such content. In a further test of our theory, we demonstrate that evidence collection is preserved when auditors view posts made by other accountants in a professional setting alongside posts featuring peers' rewarding social experiences. Given the audit quality consequences of our results, these findings have implications for practitioners, academics, and regulators.\n JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42.","PeriodicalId":48142,"journal":{"name":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media Content and Social Comparisons: An Experimental Examination of their Effect on Audit Quality\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Kuselias, Jon K. Lauck, Summer Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/ajpt-18-154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Recent evidence suggests that auditors access social media platforms habitually throughout the workday. While exploratory research has found concerning effects related to social media usage, existing research has not investigated how viewing social media content might affect auditors. Using an experiment that holds social media usage constant, we examine how social media content impacts auditors' task performance. Relying on social comparison theory, we predict and find that the collection and evaluation of audit evidence (an integral component of audit quality) suffers when auditors view posts of peers' rewarding social experiences compared to those who do not view such content. In a further test of our theory, we demonstrate that evidence collection is preserved when auditors view posts made by other accountants in a professional setting alongside posts featuring peers' rewarding social experiences. Given the audit quality consequences of our results, these findings have implications for practitioners, academics, and regulators.\\n JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-18-154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-18-154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近的证据表明,审计人员习惯在整个工作日访问社交媒体平台。虽然探索性研究已经发现了与社交媒体使用相关的影响,但现有的研究并没有调查查看社交媒体内容对审计师的影响。通过一项保持社交媒体使用不变的实验,我们研究了社交媒体内容如何影响审计师的任务绩效。依靠社会比较理论,我们预测并发现,当审计员看到同龄人有益的社会经历的帖子时,与那些没有看到这些内容的人相比,审计证据的收集和评估(审计质量的一个组成部分)会受到影响。在对我们理论的进一步测试中,我们证明,当审计师在专业环境中查看其他会计师的职位以及具有同行有益社会经验的职位时,证据收集得以保留。鉴于我们的结果对审计质量的影响,这些发现对从业人员、学者和监管机构具有启示意义。JEL分类:M40;M41;M42。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Media Content and Social Comparisons: An Experimental Examination of their Effect on Audit Quality
Recent evidence suggests that auditors access social media platforms habitually throughout the workday. While exploratory research has found concerning effects related to social media usage, existing research has not investigated how viewing social media content might affect auditors. Using an experiment that holds social media usage constant, we examine how social media content impacts auditors' task performance. Relying on social comparison theory, we predict and find that the collection and evaluation of audit evidence (an integral component of audit quality) suffers when auditors view posts of peers' rewarding social experiences compared to those who do not view such content. In a further test of our theory, we demonstrate that evidence collection is preserved when auditors view posts made by other accountants in a professional setting alongside posts featuring peers' rewarding social experiences. Given the audit quality consequences of our results, these findings have implications for practitioners, academics, and regulators. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AUDITING contains technical articles as well as news and reports on current activities of the association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信