全州范围内对临床医生职业倦怠的改进方法:基线年的发现

Heather R. Britt , Rahul Koranne , Todd Rockwood
{"title":"全州范围内对临床医生职业倦怠的改进方法:基线年的发现","authors":"Heather R. Britt ,&nbsp;Rahul Koranne ,&nbsp;Todd Rockwood","doi":"10.1016/j.burn.2017.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wellbeing of the healthcare workforce is now recognized as an important fourth component of the Quadruple Aim. Given the crisis level of burnout in physicians, national organizations have urged immediate attention to the challenge, demanding measurement and action to mitigate and prevent the phenomenon.</p><p>Seeking to understand whether a statewide approach to burnout would be feasible, Minnesota launched a collaborative to assess and establish an action framework around physician and advanced practice professional (APP) burnout in 2016. A modified Mini Z survey tool was used to assess prevalence and drivers of burnout across a census of physicians and APPs from healthcare organizations across Minnesota.</p><p>Three-quarters of healthcare systems in Minnesota participated (56 sites/systems, representing 104 unique hospitals). Of the 13,693 physicians and APPs invited, 43% responded. Baseline levels of burnout suggest emotional exhaustion and stress are slightly higher among physicians than APPs; 34% of statewide respondents reported emotional exhaustion – 36% of MD/DOs and 31% of APPs. Approximately three in five respondents reported feeling a great deal of stress because of their job. Conversely, over three-quarters of respondents reported being satisfied with their job and engaged with their work.</p><p>We propose a socio-ecological framework for acting on burnout, using a data-driven quality improvement paradigm enabled by a statewide coalition, to ensure that continued efforts do not rest solely at the feet of individuals or systems. Despite high burnout levels, engagement and satisfaction with work are also high, suggesting there is still hope for stemming the tide of burnout.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90459,"journal":{"name":"Burnout research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.burn.2017.11.002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statewide improvement approach to clinician burnout: Findings from the baseline year\",\"authors\":\"Heather R. Britt ,&nbsp;Rahul Koranne ,&nbsp;Todd Rockwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burn.2017.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Wellbeing of the healthcare workforce is now recognized as an important fourth component of the Quadruple Aim. Given the crisis level of burnout in physicians, national organizations have urged immediate attention to the challenge, demanding measurement and action to mitigate and prevent the phenomenon.</p><p>Seeking to understand whether a statewide approach to burnout would be feasible, Minnesota launched a collaborative to assess and establish an action framework around physician and advanced practice professional (APP) burnout in 2016. A modified Mini Z survey tool was used to assess prevalence and drivers of burnout across a census of physicians and APPs from healthcare organizations across Minnesota.</p><p>Three-quarters of healthcare systems in Minnesota participated (56 sites/systems, representing 104 unique hospitals). Of the 13,693 physicians and APPs invited, 43% responded. Baseline levels of burnout suggest emotional exhaustion and stress are slightly higher among physicians than APPs; 34% of statewide respondents reported emotional exhaustion – 36% of MD/DOs and 31% of APPs. Approximately three in five respondents reported feeling a great deal of stress because of their job. Conversely, over three-quarters of respondents reported being satisfied with their job and engaged with their work.</p><p>We propose a socio-ecological framework for acting on burnout, using a data-driven quality improvement paradigm enabled by a statewide coalition, to ensure that continued efforts do not rest solely at the feet of individuals or systems. Despite high burnout levels, engagement and satisfaction with work are also high, suggesting there is still hope for stemming the tide of burnout.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burnout research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.burn.2017.11.002\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burnout research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213058617300463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burnout research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213058617300463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

医疗保健工作者的福祉现在被认为是四大目标的第四个重要组成部分。鉴于医生职业倦怠的危机程度,国家组织敦促立即关注这一挑战,要求采取措施和行动来减轻和预防这一现象。为了了解全州范围内的职业倦怠方法是否可行,明尼苏达州于2016年发起了一项合作,以评估和建立围绕医生和高级实践专业人员(APP)职业倦怠的行动框架。改进的Mini Z调查工具用于评估明尼苏达州医疗保健机构的医生和app的人口普查中职业倦怠的患病率和驱动因素。明尼苏达州四分之三的医疗保健系统参与(56个站点/系统,代表104家独特的医院)。在受邀的13693名医生和app中,43%的人做出了回应。倦怠基线水平表明,医生的情绪耗竭和压力略高于app;34%的全州受访者表示情绪疲惫——36%的MD/ do和31%的app。大约五分之三的受访者表示,他们的工作压力很大。相反,超过四分之三的受访者表示对自己的工作感到满意,并投入到工作中。我们提出了一个社会生态框架,使用由全州联盟支持的数据驱动的质量改进范例来应对倦怠,以确保持续的努力不仅仅停留在个人或系统的脚下。尽管职业倦怠程度很高,但对工作的参与度和满意度也很高,这表明仍有希望遏制职业倦怠的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statewide improvement approach to clinician burnout: Findings from the baseline year

Wellbeing of the healthcare workforce is now recognized as an important fourth component of the Quadruple Aim. Given the crisis level of burnout in physicians, national organizations have urged immediate attention to the challenge, demanding measurement and action to mitigate and prevent the phenomenon.

Seeking to understand whether a statewide approach to burnout would be feasible, Minnesota launched a collaborative to assess and establish an action framework around physician and advanced practice professional (APP) burnout in 2016. A modified Mini Z survey tool was used to assess prevalence and drivers of burnout across a census of physicians and APPs from healthcare organizations across Minnesota.

Three-quarters of healthcare systems in Minnesota participated (56 sites/systems, representing 104 unique hospitals). Of the 13,693 physicians and APPs invited, 43% responded. Baseline levels of burnout suggest emotional exhaustion and stress are slightly higher among physicians than APPs; 34% of statewide respondents reported emotional exhaustion – 36% of MD/DOs and 31% of APPs. Approximately three in five respondents reported feeling a great deal of stress because of their job. Conversely, over three-quarters of respondents reported being satisfied with their job and engaged with their work.

We propose a socio-ecological framework for acting on burnout, using a data-driven quality improvement paradigm enabled by a statewide coalition, to ensure that continued efforts do not rest solely at the feet of individuals or systems. Despite high burnout levels, engagement and satisfaction with work are also high, suggesting there is still hope for stemming the tide of burnout.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信