标准化/简化水淹模式审查

Z. Al-Yazeedi, Y. Al-Zaabi, Mahmood Al-Oraimi, Wafa Al-Kiyumi, Ashwaq Al-Rawahi, Kifah Al-Tobi, Ali Amor Algheithy
{"title":"标准化/简化水淹模式审查","authors":"Z. Al-Yazeedi, Y. Al-Zaabi, Mahmood Al-Oraimi, Wafa Al-Kiyumi, Ashwaq Al-Rawahi, Kifah Al-Tobi, Ali Amor Algheithy","doi":"10.2118/195077-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Water flood WF accounts for 40% of Petroleum Development Oman PDO's oil production and volumes. A proper WF management is a key to realize that. This project aims to standardize and simplify WF performance review process, which is very important part of WF management.\n \n \n \n The current condition of WF performance review vary from field to another in term of frequency of conducting the reviews i.e, once a year, quarterly which resulted in missing the opportunities to improve the WF performance on the right time.\n Different in house tools and databases are used to prepare the technical materials for the review meeting. As a result, different fields have different way of presenting the technical materials to the reviewers across the company, so no standard pattern review template available and multiple sources for data are used. The field petroleum engineer takes up to 4 hours to prepare the technical material for one pattern review and usually senior or high skills PE requires generating different type of plots. When the Pattern review conducted almost 4 hours for the individual petroleum engineers spent during one pattern review.\n The proposed counter measures for this project were to replace the review frequency to exception or requirement base to ensure no missed opportunities. As well as standardizing the technical materials for WF pattern review using a single tool/source. The standard template has to fit all patterns in a field. It has to be accessible, with good visualization, and secured storage\n A Successful pilot run in one of the water flood fields in North Oman with 30+ WF patterns and has demonstrated the following results; standard review template developed within one source data platform. The pattern review was conducted on exceptional based which was a proactive approach. The PE team managed to generate extra optimization opportunities which resulted in proven an increased in oil production of +30 m3/d from 5 patterns. PE saved 3.5 hours/ pattern in preparation. The reviewers appreciated the improvement of quality of the technical materials, which create direct focus on issues identified based on exception. All the technical material were easy to generate by any less experience engineers.\n To maintain sustainability of the achieved improvements, some lean tools have been used. These tools are summarized in the following points; Standard operating procedures (SOP); two SOPs were generated, one to set up the tool and the other to do the review.Visual management (VM); was also generated to keep track the pattern review and ensure healthy WFM and.Leader Standard Work (LSW); it was completed to ensure sustainability through leader ship support.\n","PeriodicalId":11321,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardize/Simplify Water Flood Pattern Reviews\",\"authors\":\"Z. Al-Yazeedi, Y. Al-Zaabi, Mahmood Al-Oraimi, Wafa Al-Kiyumi, Ashwaq Al-Rawahi, Kifah Al-Tobi, Ali Amor Algheithy\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/195077-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Water flood WF accounts for 40% of Petroleum Development Oman PDO's oil production and volumes. A proper WF management is a key to realize that. This project aims to standardize and simplify WF performance review process, which is very important part of WF management.\\n \\n \\n \\n The current condition of WF performance review vary from field to another in term of frequency of conducting the reviews i.e, once a year, quarterly which resulted in missing the opportunities to improve the WF performance on the right time.\\n Different in house tools and databases are used to prepare the technical materials for the review meeting. As a result, different fields have different way of presenting the technical materials to the reviewers across the company, so no standard pattern review template available and multiple sources for data are used. The field petroleum engineer takes up to 4 hours to prepare the technical material for one pattern review and usually senior or high skills PE requires generating different type of plots. When the Pattern review conducted almost 4 hours for the individual petroleum engineers spent during one pattern review.\\n The proposed counter measures for this project were to replace the review frequency to exception or requirement base to ensure no missed opportunities. As well as standardizing the technical materials for WF pattern review using a single tool/source. The standard template has to fit all patterns in a field. It has to be accessible, with good visualization, and secured storage\\n A Successful pilot run in one of the water flood fields in North Oman with 30+ WF patterns and has demonstrated the following results; standard review template developed within one source data platform. The pattern review was conducted on exceptional based which was a proactive approach. The PE team managed to generate extra optimization opportunities which resulted in proven an increased in oil production of +30 m3/d from 5 patterns. PE saved 3.5 hours/ pattern in preparation. The reviewers appreciated the improvement of quality of the technical materials, which create direct focus on issues identified based on exception. All the technical material were easy to generate by any less experience engineers.\\n To maintain sustainability of the achieved improvements, some lean tools have been used. These tools are summarized in the following points; Standard operating procedures (SOP); two SOPs were generated, one to set up the tool and the other to do the review.Visual management (VM); was also generated to keep track the pattern review and ensure healthy WFM and.Leader Standard Work (LSW); it was completed to ensure sustainability through leader ship support.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/195077-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195077-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水驱WF占阿曼石油开发公司石油产量和产量的40%。正确的WF管理是实现这一目标的关键。该项目旨在规范和简化WF绩效考核流程,这是WF管理的重要组成部分。世界基金绩效审查的现状因地而异,审查的频率不同,即一年一次,每季度一次,这导致错过了在适当的时候改善世界基金绩效的机会。不同的内部工具和数据库用于准备评审会议的技术材料。因此,不同的领域以不同的方式向整个公司的审阅者展示技术材料,因此没有可用的标准模式审阅模板,并且使用了多个数据源。现场石油工程师需要4个小时来准备一次模式审查的技术材料,通常需要高级或高技能的PE来生成不同类型的地块。当模式审查进行时,每个石油工程师在一次模式审查中花费了近4个小时。针对这个项目提出的对策是将审查频率替换为例外或需求基础,以确保没有错过机会。以及使用单一工具/源对WF模式审查的技术材料进行标准化。标准模板必须适合字段中的所有模式。在阿曼北部的一个水驱油田成功进行了30多个WF模式的试验,并证明了以下结果:在一个源数据平台内开发的标准审查模板。模式审查是在例外的基础上进行的,这是一种积极主动的方法。PE团队设法创造了额外的优化机会,从而使5个模式的石油产量增加了30立方米/天。PE在制作过程中节省3.5小时/张。审稿人赞赏技术材料质量的提高,这直接关注了根据例外情况确定的问题。所有的技术材料都很容易被经验不足的工程师制作出来。为了保持已取得的改进的可持续性,使用了一些精益工具。这些工具可归纳为以下几点:标准操作程序(SOP);生成了两个sop,一个用于设置工具,另一个用于进行评审。可视化管理(VM);还生成了跟踪模式审查并确保健康的WFM和。领导标准工作(LSW);它的完成是为了通过领导的支持来确保可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardize/Simplify Water Flood Pattern Reviews
Water flood WF accounts for 40% of Petroleum Development Oman PDO's oil production and volumes. A proper WF management is a key to realize that. This project aims to standardize and simplify WF performance review process, which is very important part of WF management. The current condition of WF performance review vary from field to another in term of frequency of conducting the reviews i.e, once a year, quarterly which resulted in missing the opportunities to improve the WF performance on the right time. Different in house tools and databases are used to prepare the technical materials for the review meeting. As a result, different fields have different way of presenting the technical materials to the reviewers across the company, so no standard pattern review template available and multiple sources for data are used. The field petroleum engineer takes up to 4 hours to prepare the technical material for one pattern review and usually senior or high skills PE requires generating different type of plots. When the Pattern review conducted almost 4 hours for the individual petroleum engineers spent during one pattern review. The proposed counter measures for this project were to replace the review frequency to exception or requirement base to ensure no missed opportunities. As well as standardizing the technical materials for WF pattern review using a single tool/source. The standard template has to fit all patterns in a field. It has to be accessible, with good visualization, and secured storage A Successful pilot run in one of the water flood fields in North Oman with 30+ WF patterns and has demonstrated the following results; standard review template developed within one source data platform. The pattern review was conducted on exceptional based which was a proactive approach. The PE team managed to generate extra optimization opportunities which resulted in proven an increased in oil production of +30 m3/d from 5 patterns. PE saved 3.5 hours/ pattern in preparation. The reviewers appreciated the improvement of quality of the technical materials, which create direct focus on issues identified based on exception. All the technical material were easy to generate by any less experience engineers. To maintain sustainability of the achieved improvements, some lean tools have been used. These tools are summarized in the following points; Standard operating procedures (SOP); two SOPs were generated, one to set up the tool and the other to do the review.Visual management (VM); was also generated to keep track the pattern review and ensure healthy WFM and.Leader Standard Work (LSW); it was completed to ensure sustainability through leader ship support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信