认知和/或行为治疗社交焦虑障碍的有效性

S. Mululo, G. Menezes, Leonardo Franklin Fontenelle, M. Versiani
{"title":"认知和/或行为治疗社交焦虑障碍的有效性","authors":"S. Mululo, G. Menezes, Leonardo Franklin Fontenelle, M. Versiani","doi":"10.1590/S0101-81082009000300007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To ascertain whether cognitive and/or behavioral treatment of patients with social anxiety disorder is superior in terms of effi cacy than other types of therapeutic interventions, including pharmacotherapy. Method: Systematic analysis of all randomized clinical trials on cognitive and/or behavioral therapy vs. other forms of treatment, published until March 2009, indexed in the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, LILACS and ISI Web of Science. Results: The reported results do not suggest signifi cant differences in the effi cacy of cognitive and/or behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy. Such treatments combined did not show higher effi cacy than interventions alone. Compared with the control group, cognitive and/or behavioral therapy was superior in reducing social anxiety disorder, either in the classic model or in the newest propositions. The only exception was the social skills training, which was not effective for patients with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive and/or behavioral therapy was also superior to other psychotherapeutic interventions. Conclusion: Cognitive and/or behavioral therapy is an effective treatment for patients with social anxiety disorder. However, the heterogeneity of the clinical trials evaluated, with reference to treatment features (time of treatment and different protocols) or characteristics of the patients (severity of their clinical picture and how they were recruited) made comparison of results between different treatments diffi cult. More research on cognitive and/or behavioral treatment and new reviews of these interventions are necessary to better assess our fi ndings.","PeriodicalId":31894,"journal":{"name":"Boletim Geografico do Rio Grande do Sul","volume":"111 1","pages":"177-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of cognitive and/or behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder\",\"authors\":\"S. Mululo, G. Menezes, Leonardo Franklin Fontenelle, M. Versiani\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0101-81082009000300007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To ascertain whether cognitive and/or behavioral treatment of patients with social anxiety disorder is superior in terms of effi cacy than other types of therapeutic interventions, including pharmacotherapy. Method: Systematic analysis of all randomized clinical trials on cognitive and/or behavioral therapy vs. other forms of treatment, published until March 2009, indexed in the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, LILACS and ISI Web of Science. Results: The reported results do not suggest signifi cant differences in the effi cacy of cognitive and/or behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy. Such treatments combined did not show higher effi cacy than interventions alone. Compared with the control group, cognitive and/or behavioral therapy was superior in reducing social anxiety disorder, either in the classic model or in the newest propositions. The only exception was the social skills training, which was not effective for patients with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive and/or behavioral therapy was also superior to other psychotherapeutic interventions. Conclusion: Cognitive and/or behavioral therapy is an effective treatment for patients with social anxiety disorder. However, the heterogeneity of the clinical trials evaluated, with reference to treatment features (time of treatment and different protocols) or characteristics of the patients (severity of their clinical picture and how they were recruited) made comparison of results between different treatments diffi cult. More research on cognitive and/or behavioral treatment and new reviews of these interventions are necessary to better assess our fi ndings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boletim Geografico do Rio Grande do Sul\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"177-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boletim Geografico do Rio Grande do Sul\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81082009000300007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletim Geografico do Rio Grande do Sul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81082009000300007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:探讨认知和/或行为治疗对社交焦虑障碍患者的疗效是否优于其他类型的治疗干预,包括药物治疗。方法:系统分析截至2009年3月发表的所有关于认知和/或行为治疗与其他形式治疗的随机临床试验,在以下数据库中检索:MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane对照试验注册,LILACS和ISI科学网。结果:报告的结果不表明认知和/或行为治疗和药物治疗的疗效有显著差异。这些联合治疗并不比单独干预更有效。与对照组相比,认知和/或行为治疗在减轻社交焦虑障碍方面,无论是在经典模型还是在最新的命题上都有明显的优势。唯一的例外是社交技能训练,这对社交焦虑症患者没有效果。认知和/或行为治疗也优于其他心理治疗干预。结论:认知和/或行为疗法是治疗社交焦虑障碍的有效方法。然而,临床试验评估的异质性,参考治疗特征(治疗时间和不同方案)或患者特征(其临床症状的严重程度和招募方式),使得不同治疗之间的结果比较困难。为了更好地评估我们的发现,有必要对认知和/或行为治疗进行更多的研究,并对这些干预措施进行新的回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of cognitive and/or behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder
Objective: To ascertain whether cognitive and/or behavioral treatment of patients with social anxiety disorder is superior in terms of effi cacy than other types of therapeutic interventions, including pharmacotherapy. Method: Systematic analysis of all randomized clinical trials on cognitive and/or behavioral therapy vs. other forms of treatment, published until March 2009, indexed in the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, LILACS and ISI Web of Science. Results: The reported results do not suggest signifi cant differences in the effi cacy of cognitive and/or behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy. Such treatments combined did not show higher effi cacy than interventions alone. Compared with the control group, cognitive and/or behavioral therapy was superior in reducing social anxiety disorder, either in the classic model or in the newest propositions. The only exception was the social skills training, which was not effective for patients with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive and/or behavioral therapy was also superior to other psychotherapeutic interventions. Conclusion: Cognitive and/or behavioral therapy is an effective treatment for patients with social anxiety disorder. However, the heterogeneity of the clinical trials evaluated, with reference to treatment features (time of treatment and different protocols) or characteristics of the patients (severity of their clinical picture and how they were recruited) made comparison of results between different treatments diffi cult. More research on cognitive and/or behavioral treatment and new reviews of these interventions are necessary to better assess our fi ndings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信