{"title":"悲叹还是期待:重新审视理论之后","authors":"L. Tang","doi":"10.1080/25723618.2017.1339511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay makes a comment on Terry Eagleton’s After Theory, discusses the major issues of this book including the relationship between theory and politics, postmodernism, cultural theory, anti-theory and the like, and verifies Eagleton’s “political criticism” position. This essay intents to indicate that After Theory is not a lament for “the death of theory” but an expectation to a new paradigm of theory.","PeriodicalId":34832,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Literature East West","volume":"80 1","pages":"140 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lament or Expectation: After Theory Revisited\",\"authors\":\"L. Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25723618.2017.1339511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This essay makes a comment on Terry Eagleton’s After Theory, discusses the major issues of this book including the relationship between theory and politics, postmodernism, cultural theory, anti-theory and the like, and verifies Eagleton’s “political criticism” position. This essay intents to indicate that After Theory is not a lament for “the death of theory” but an expectation to a new paradigm of theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Literature East West\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"140 - 144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Literature East West\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2017.1339511\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Literature East West","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2017.1339511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT This essay makes a comment on Terry Eagleton’s After Theory, discusses the major issues of this book including the relationship between theory and politics, postmodernism, cultural theory, anti-theory and the like, and verifies Eagleton’s “political criticism” position. This essay intents to indicate that After Theory is not a lament for “the death of theory” but an expectation to a new paradigm of theory.